World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
65
Citations
13371
World Ranking
1814
National Ranking
663

R. Terry Bowyer publications per year

1981: 1 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 1 publications 1989: 1 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 11 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 2 publications
1981 2025

186 publications in total across all disciplines

R. Terry Bowyer publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where R. Terry Bowyer sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 174 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

R. Terry Bowyer D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where R. Terry Bowyer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2000 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

R. Terry Bowyer is affiliated with the University of Alaska Fairbanks in the United States and has a research focus primarily in Environmental Science. Their work spans several subfields, including Ecology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change, and Genetics.

The scientist has contributed extensively to topics related to Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Rangeland and Wildlife Management, and Ecology and Biodiversity Studies. Additional areas of research encompass Genetic and Phenotypic Traits in Livestock, Forest Management and Policy, Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education, and Species Distribution and Climate Change.

Among their recent publications are:

  • Evolution of ungulate mating systems: Integrating social and environmental factors (2020, Ecology and Evolution)
  • Restoration of bighorn sheep: History, successes, and remaining conservation issues (2023, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution)
  • Efficacy of Killing Large Carnivores to Enhance Moose Harvests: New Insights from a Long-Term View (2022, Diversity)
  • A Call for More Nuanced Dialogues About Trophy Hunting (2021, Journal of Wildlife Management)
  • Sex-based differences affect conservation (2024, Science)

Bowyer has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including Vernon C. Bleich, Jericho C. Whiting, Janet L. Rachlow, Carl D. Mitchell, and James R. Heffelfinger.

Their research has been published in venues such as Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, Journal of Wildlife Management, Ecology and Evolution, Diversity, and Science.

In addition to articles, the scientist has authored books, including Sexual Segregation in Ungulates, published by Johns Hopkins University Press in 2022.

Recognizing their contributions to science, Bowyer was named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in the year 2000.

Best Publications

  • LANDSCAPE HETEROGENEITY AT DIFFERING SCALES: EFFECTS ON SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF MULE DEER

    John G. Kie;R. Terry Bowyer;Matthew C. Nicholson;Brian B. Boroski

  • Habitat selection and survival of mule deer : Tradeoffs associated with migration

    Matthew C. Nicholson;R. Terry Bowyer;John G. Kie

  • TEMPOROSPATIAL DISTRIBUTIONS OF ELK, MULE DEER, AND CATTLE: RESOURCE PARTITIONING AND COMPETITIVE DISPLACEMENT

    Kelley M. Stewart;R. Terry Bowyer;John G. Kie;John G. Kie;Norman J. Cimon

  • Life-history consequences of maternal condition in Alaskan moose

    Mark A. Keech;R. Terry Bowyer;Jay M. Ver Hoef;Rodney D. Boertje

  • Sexual Segregation in White-Tailed Deer: Density-Dependent Changes in Use of Space, Habitat Selection, and Dietary Niche

    J. G. Kie;R. T. Bowyer

  • SEXUAL SEGREGATION IN DIMORPHIC DEER: A NEW GASTROCENTRIC HYPOTHESIS

    Perry S. Barboza;R. Terry Bowyer

  • Density-dependent effects on physical condition and reproduction in North American elk: an experimental test.

    Kelley M. Stewart;R. Terry. Bowyer;R. Terry. Bowyer;Brian L. Dick;Bruce K. Johnson

  • Life-History Characteristics of Mule Deer: Effects of Nutrition in a Variable Environment

    Kevin L. Monteith;Vernon C. Bleich;Thomas R. Stephenson;Becky M. Pierce

  • Costs and Benefits of Group Living in a Recently Social Ungulate: The Alaskan Moose

    Erik M. Molvar;R. Terry Bowyer

  • Sexual Segregation in Southern Mule Deer

    R. Terry Bowyer

  • Birth-Site Selection by Alaskan Moose: Maternal Strategies for Coping with a Risky Environment

    R. Terry Bowyer;Victor Van Ballenberghe;John G. Kie;Julie A. K. Maier

  • SEXUAL SEGREGATION IN RUMINANTS: DEFINITIONS, HYPOTHESES, AND IMPLICATIONS FOR CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT

    R. Terry Bowyer

  • Mitochondrial phylogeography of moose (Alces alces): late pleistocene divergence and population expansion.

    Kris J. Hundertmark;Kris J. Hundertmark;Gerald F. Shields;Irina G. Udina;R.Terry Bowyer

  • Risk-sensitive allocation in seasonal dynamics of fat and protein reserves in a long-lived mammal

    Kevin L. Monteith;Kevin L. Monteith;Kevin L. Monteith;Thomas R. Stephenson;Thomas R. Stephenson;Vernon C. Bleich;Vernon C. Bleich;Mary M. Conner

  • HABITAT SELECTION BY MULE DEER: FORAGE BENEFITS OR RISK OF PREDATION?

    Becky M. Pierce;R. Terry Bowyer;Vernon C. Bleich

  • Habitat Use by Female Caribou: Tradeoffs Associated with Parturition

    Neil L. Barten;R. Terry Bowyer;Kurt J. Jenkins

  • Moose herbivory, browse quality, and nutrient cycling in an Alaskan treeline community.

    Erik M. Molvar;R. Terry Bowyer;Victor Van Ballenberghe

  • Functional response of wolves preying on barren-ground caribou in a multiple-prey ecosystem

    Unknown

  • Timing of seasonal migration in mule deer: effects of climate, plant phenology, and life‐history characteristics

    Kevin L. Monteith;Kevin L. Monteith;Vernon C. Bleich;Vernon C. Bleich;Thomas R. Stephenson;Thomas R. Stephenson;Becky M. Pierce;Becky M. Pierce

  • SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND ECOSYSTEM PROCESSES: RIVER OTTER LATRINES AND NUTRIENT DYNAMICS OF TERRESTRIAL VEGETATION

    M. Ben-David;R. T. Bowyer;L. K. Duffy;D. D. Roby

  • Habitat selection by Dall's sheep (Ovis dalli): maternal trade‐offs

    Janet L. Rachlow;R. Terry Bowyer

Frequent Co-Authors

John G. Kie
John G. Kie Idaho State University
Vernon C. Bleich
Vernon C. Bleich University of Nevada Reno
Kevin L. Monteith
Kevin L. Monteith University of Wyoming
Jonathan A. Jenks
Jonathan A. Jenks South Dakota State University
Charles C. Schwartz
Charles C. Schwartz United States Geological Survey
Janet L. Rachlow
Janet L. Rachlow University of Idaho
Roger W. Ruess
Roger W. Ruess University of Alaska Fairbanks
Paul R. Krausman
Paul R. Krausman University of Arizona
Michael M. Cox
Michael M. Cox University of Wisconsin–Madison
Falk Huettmann
Falk Huettmann University of Alaska Fairbanks

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution can be even more rewarding when supported by versatile online degree programs. Many students combine their passion for natural sciences with healthcare, public policy, or research-focused careers. Today, flexible online education options allow you to broaden your skills or change directions quickly.

For those interested in healthcare fields that often intersect with environmental studies, consider accelerated options such as the rn to bsn in 6 months. This pathway is perfect for registered nurses seeking to elevate their qualifications efficiently. If you have an Associate Degree in Nursing, programs like adn to np programs make it possible to bridge into advanced practice and expand your career potential.

Even those without a nursing background can explore graduate-level health professions through a direct entry msn online program. When choosing your path, you may wonder which school is better snhu vs wgu. Comparing faculty expertise, curriculum, flexibility, and student support can guide your decision and future career success.

Best Scientists Citing R. Terry Bowyer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles