World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Thomas J. Polascik

Thomas J. Polascik

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 78 18172 17072 9057 8368 544 18692

Thomas J. Polascik publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Thomas J. Polascik between 1987 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Thomas J. Polascik published across 39 years, from 1987 to 2025, averaging 14.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 44 publications in 2010. 25 of the 577 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 44. Peak 44 publications in 2010. 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 22 publications 2008: 35 publications 2009: 42 publications 2010: 44 publications 2011: 38 publications 2012: 35 publications 2013: 23 publications 2014: 26 publications 2015: 22 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 28 publications 2018: 27 publications 2019: 25 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 30 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 35 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 11 publications
1987 2025

577 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Thomas J. Polascik: publications per year, 1987 to 2025
Year Publications
1987 1
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 9
1996 4
1997 2
1998 6
1999 4
2000 4
2001 4
2002 4
2003 3
2004 6
2005 8
2006 10
2007 22
2008 35
2009 42
2010 44
2011 38
2012 35
2013 23
2014 26
2015 22
2016 17
2017 28
2018 27
2019 25
2020 19
2021 30
2022 19
2023 35
2024 14
2025 11
Total 577
Download as CSV

Thomas J. Polascik publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas J. Polascik sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 541–560 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 544 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537 544
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Thomas J. Polascik D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas J. Polascik sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78–79 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891 78
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Thomas J. Polascik is affiliated with Duke University in the United States and has made contributions primarily in the field of Medicine, with a concentration in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, and Urology. Their research covers a range of topics including Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment, Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques, Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies, and treatments related to Renal cell carcinoma as well as Bladder and Urothelial Cancer.

The scientist's recent publications include studies focusing on advancements in robotic and minimally invasive surgical techniques. Important works in 2020, for example, are:

  • "Pure Single-site Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Using Single-port Versus Multiport Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Single-institution Comparative Study" (2020) published in European Urology Focus
  • "Single-Port Robotic Urological Surgery Using Purpose-Built Single-Port Surgical System: Single-Institutional Experience With the First 100 Cases" (2020) published in Urology
  • "Floating docking technique: a simple modification to improve the working space of the instruments during single-port robotic surgery" (2020) published in World Journal of Urology
  • "Outpatient Extraperitoneal Single-Port Robotic Radical Prostatectomy" (2020) published in Urology
  • "Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Using Single-port Perineal Approach: Technique and Single-surgeon Matched-paired Comparative Outcomes" (2020) published in European Urology

Frequent collaborators in their work include:

  • Jihad Kaouk
  • Guilherme Sawczyn
  • Louis Lenfant
  • Clark A. Wilson
  • Soo-Dong Kim

Their research outputs have been prominently published in the following venues:

  • The Journal of Urology with 16 publications
  • Urology with 11 publications
  • Journal of Endourology with 5 publications
  • European Urology with 3 publications
  • Urologic Oncology Seminars and Original Investigations with 3 publications

Their research field focuses on complex clinical and surgical aspects within medicine, specifically addressing areas related to prostate and urinary system diseases.

Best Publications

  • PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN: A DECADE OF DISCOVERY-WHAT WE HAVE LEARNED AND WHERE WE ARE GOING

    Thomas J. Polascik;Joseph E. Oesterling;Alan W. Partin

  • Frequency of homozygous deletion at p16/CDKN2 in primary human tumours

    P. Cairns;T. J. Polascik;Y. Eby;K. Tokino

  • Synthesis and evaluation of 18F-labeled choline as an oncologic tracer for positron emission tomography: initial findings in prostate cancer.

    Timothy R. DeGrado;R. Edward Coleman;Shuyan Wang;Steven W. Baldwin

  • The role of focal therapy in the management of localised prostate cancer: a systematic review

    Massimo Valerio;Massimo Valerio;Hashim U Ahmed;Mark Emberton;Nathan L Lawrentschuk

  • Satisfaction and Regret after Open Retropubic or Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

    Florian R. Schroeck;Tracey L. Krupski;Leon Sun;David M. Albala

  • Comparison of [18F]Fluorocholine and [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose for Positron Emission Tomography of Androgen Dependent and Androgen Independent Prostate Cancer

    David T. Price;R. Edward Coleman;Ray P. Liao;Cary N. Robertson

  • New and Established Technology in Focal Ablation of the Prostate: A Systematic Review

    Massimo Valerio;Massimo Valerio;Massimo Valerio;Yannick Cerantola;Scott E. Eggener;Herbert Lepor

  • Treatment of Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma

    Hendrik Van Poppel;Frank Becker;Jeffrey A Cadeddu;Inderbir S Gill

  • PILOT STUDY OF DIETARY FAT RESTRICTION AND FLAXSEED SUPPLEMENTATION IN MEN WITH PROSTATE CANCER BEFORE SURGERY: EXPLORING THE EFFECTS ON HORMONAL LEVELS, PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN, AND HISTOPATHOLOGIC FEATURES

    Wendy Demark-Wahnefried;David T Price;Thomas J Polascik;Cary N Robertson

  • Variability of the positive predictive value of PI-RADS for prostate MRI across 26 centers: Experience of the society of abdominal radiology prostate cancer disease-focused panel

    Antonio C. Westphalen;Charles E. McCulloch;Jordan M. Anaokar;Sandeep Arora

  • Focal Therapy: Patients, Interventions, and Outcomes—A Report from a Consensus Meeting

    Ian A. Donaldson;Ian A. Donaldson;Roberto Alonzi;Dean Barratt;Eric Barret

  • Rationale for percutaneous biopsy and histologic characterisation of renal tumours.

    Alessandro Volpe;Antonio Finelli;Inderbir S. Gill;Michael A.S. Jewett

  • Flaxseed Supplementation (Not Dietary Fat Restriction) Reduces Prostate Cancer Proliferation Rates in Men Presurgery

    Wendy Demark-Wahnefried;Thomas J. Polascik;Stephen L. George;Boyd R. Switzer

  • Partial Nephrectomy: Technique Complications and Pathological Findings

    Thomas J. Polascik;Charles R. Pound;Maxwell V. Meng;Alan W. Partin

  • Implementation of Germline Testing for Prostate Cancer: Philadelphia Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2019

    Veda N. Giri;Karen E. Knudsen;William K. Kelly;Heather H. Cheng

  • Focal Therapy in Prostate Cancer-Report from a Consensus Panel

    J. de la Rosette;H. Ahmed;J. Barentsz;T. Bjerklund Johansen

  • Promoter Hypermethylation Profile of Kidney Cancer

    Essel Dulaimi;Inmaculada Ibanez de Caceres;Robert G. Uzzo;Tahseen Al-Saleem

  • Prostate cancer laterality as a rationale of focal ablative therapy for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer.

    Vladimir Mouraviev;Janice M. Mayes;Leon Sun;John F. Madden

  • Survey of neuromuscular injuries to the patient and surgeon during urologic laparoscopic surgery

    J. Stuart Wolf;Robert Marcovich;Inderbir S. Gill;Gyung Tak Sung

  • Novel suppressor loci on chromosome 14q in primary bladder cancer.

    Wayne Yen Hwa Chang;Paul Cairns;Mark P. Schoenberg;Thomas J. Polascik

Frequent Co-Authors

Judd W. Moul
Judd W. Moul Duke University
Stephen J. Freedland
Stephen J. Freedland Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Mark L. Palmeri
Mark L. Palmeri Duke University
Kathryn R. Nightingale
Kathryn R. Nightingale Duke University
Martha K. Terris
Martha K. Terris Augusta University
William J. Aronson
William J. Aronson University of California, Los Angeles
Wendy Demark-Wahnefried
Wendy Demark-Wahnefried University of Alabama at Birmingham
Matthew R. Cooperberg
Matthew R. Cooperberg University of California, San Francisco
Christopher J. Kane
Christopher J. Kane University of California, San Diego
Leah Gerber
Leah Gerber Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Medicine in the USA opens doors to a wide array of healthcare careers beyond becoming a physician. Many students explore related fields through flexible online programs, which are increasingly popular for their affordability and convenience.

A popular entry-level pathway is medical coding, which supports hospitals and clinics with accurate health information and billing. If you’re curious about costs, how much does it cost to become a medical coder covers the most affordable online course options.

Nursing remains one of the most in-demand careers. For current nurses aiming to take the next step, there are affordable online fnp programs to become a Family Nurse Practitioner. Those who want to advance from RN to BSN can find the cheapest rn to bsn online for a budget-friendly option.

For experienced nurses interested in leadership or advanced clinical roles, the cheapest dnp programs online make a terminal degree accessible without incurring substantial debt.

These alternative healthcare degrees offer flexible, affordable career paths that complement a traditional medical education.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas J. Polascik

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles