World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Best Scientists
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Best Scientists

D-Index
174
Citations
122264
World Ranking
744
National Ranking
458

Medicine

D-Index
176
Citations
126540
World Ranking
416
National Ranking
251

Jonathan I. Epstein publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan I. Epstein sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,324 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jonathan I. Epstein D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan I. Epstein sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 176 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Scientists Award

Overview

Jonathan I. Epstein is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University in the United States. Their research is primarily focused on medicine, with significant contributions in subfields such as pulmonary and respiratory medicine, surgery, rheumatology, molecular biology, and oncology.

The main topics of their work include:

  • Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Urologic and reproductive health conditions
  • Urinary and Genital Oncology Studies
  • Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
  • Renal cell carcinoma treatment
  • Urological Disorders and Treatments

Jonathan I. Epstein has authored papers spanning several leading journals and venues. Their frequent publication venues include:

  • The American Journal of Surgical Pathology
  • Modern Pathology
  • The Journal of Urology
  • Human Pathology
  • Histopathology

Selected recent publications are:

  • "The 2019 Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) White Paper on Contemporary Grading of Prostate Cancer," 2020, Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
  • "Genomic and phenotypic heterogeneity in prostate cancer," 2020, Nature Reviews Urology
  • "Active Surveillance of Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer: Long-term Outcomes from a Large Prospective Cohort," 2020, European Urology
  • "New developments in existing WHO entities and evolving molecular concepts: The Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) update on renal neoplasia," 2021, Modern Pathology
  • "Novel, emerging and provisional renal entities: The Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) update on renal neoplasia," 2021, Modern Pathology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Jonathan I. Epstein include:

  • Rajal B. Shah
  • Michelle S. Hirsch
  • Kiril Trpkov
  • George J. Netto
  • Sean R. Williamson

The broad scope and depth of Jonathan I. Epstein's research show a consistent focus on genitourinary pathology, especially prostate and renal neoplasias. Their scholarly output reflects sustained engagement with both clinical and molecular aspects of urologic oncology and pathology.

Best Publications

  • The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.

    Jonathan I. Epstein;Lars Egevad;Mahul B. Amin;Brett Delahunt

  • The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma

    Geert J.L.H. van Leenders;Theodorus H. van der Kwast;David J. Grignon;Andrew J. Evans

  • Pathologic and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostate cancer

    Jonathan I. Epstein;Patrick C. Walsh;Marné Carmichael;Charles B. Brendler

  • The Use of Prostate Specific Antigen, Clinical Stage and Gleason Score to Predict Pathological Stage in Men with Localized Prostate Cancer

    Alan W. Partin;John Yoo;H. Ballentine Carter;Jay D. Pearson

  • A Contemporary Prostate Cancer Grading System: A Validated Alternative to the Gleason Score.

    Jonathan I. Epstein;Michael J. Zelefsky;Daniel D. Sjoberg;Joel B. Nelson

  • The World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology consensus classification of urothelial (transitional cell) neoplasms of the urinary bladder

    Jonathan I. Epstein;Mahul B. Amin;Victor R. Reuter;Fathollah K. Mostofi

  • Contemporary Update of Prostate Cancer Staging Nomograms (Partin Tables) for the New Millennium

    Alan W Partin;Leslie A Mangold;Dana M Lamm;Patrick C Walsh

  • Long-term biochemical disease-free and cancer-specific survival following anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. The 15-year Johns Hopkins experience.

    Misop Han;Alan W. Partin;Charles R. Pound;Jonathan I. Epstein

  • The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Vancouver classification of renal neoplasia

    John R. Srigley;Brett Delahunt;John N. Eble;Lars Egevad

  • Proliferative Inflammatory Atrophy of the Prostate : Implications for Prostatic Carcinogenesis

    Angelo M. De Marzo;Valerie L. Marchi;Jonathan I. Epstein;William G. Nelson

  • Cytidine methylation of regulatory sequences near the pi-class glutathione S-transferase gene accompanies human prostatic carcinogenesis

    Wen-Hsiang Lee;R. A. Morton;J. I. Epstein;J. D. Brooks

  • Cancer control and quality of life following anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy: results at 10 years.

    Patrick C. Walsh;Alan W. Partin;Jonathan I. Epstein

  • Immunohistochemical analysis of bcl-2, bax, bcl-X, and mcl-1 expression in prostate cancers.

    Maryla Krajewska;Stanislaw Krajewski;Jonathan I. Epstein;Ahmed Shabaik

  • Prostate Specific Antigen in the Staging of Localized Prostate Cancer: Influence of Tumor Differentiation, Tumor Volume and Benign Hyperplasia

    Alan W. Partin;H. Ballentine Carter;Daniel W. Chan;Jonathan I. Epstein

  • Upgrading and Downgrading of Prostate Cancer from Biopsy to Radical Prostatectomy: Incidence and Predictive Factors Using the Modified Gleason Grading System and Factoring in Tertiary Grades

    Jonathan I. Epstein;Zhaoyong Feng;Bruce J. Trock;Phillip M. Pierorazio

  • Prognostic Gleason grade grouping: Data based on the modified Gleason scoring system

    Phillip M. Pierorazio;Patrick C. Walsh;Alan W. Partin;Jonathan I. Epstein

  • The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grading System for Renal Cell Carcinoma and Other Prognostic Parameters

    Brett Delahunt;John C. Cheville;Guido Martignoni;Peter A. Humphrey

  • Prostate-specific Antigen After Anatomic Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy. Patterns of Recurrence and Cancer Control

    Charles R. Pound;Alan W. Partin;Jonathan I. Epstein;Patrick C. Walsh

  • Serum PSA after anatomic radical prostatectomy. The Johns Hopkins experience after 10 years

    A W Partin;C R Pound;J Q Clemens;J I Epstein

  • Prostate Specific Antigen in the Preoperative and Postoperative Evaluation of Localized Prostatic Cancer Treated with Radical Prostatectomy

    Joseph E. Oesterling;Daniel W. Chan;Jonathan I. Epstein;Allyn W. Kimball

Frequent Co-Authors

Alan W. Partin
Alan W. Partin Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Patrick C. Walsh
Patrick C. Walsh Johns Hopkins University
H. Ballentine Carter
H. Ballentine Carter Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
George J. Netto
George J. Netto University of Alabama at Birmingham
Bruce J. Trock
Bruce J. Trock Johns Hopkins University
Pedram Argani
Pedram Argani Johns Hopkins University
Mahul B. Amin
Mahul B. Amin University of Tennessee Health Science Center
Rodolfo Montironi
Rodolfo Montironi Marche Polytechnic University
Peter A. Humphrey
Peter A. Humphrey Yale University
Victor E. Reuter
Victor E. Reuter Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in healthcare but want alternatives to traditional medical school? There are numerous accredited online degrees available for various health-related fields. For those drawn to the administrative side, an online healthcare administration degree can prepare you for leadership roles in hospitals, clinics, and medical offices. This pathway is ideal if you enjoy management, problem-solving, and organizing healthcare services.

If you’re looking for an entry point to clinical roles, some students explore the path of Licensed Practical Nursing, and you can find an lpn school without teas test as an accessible starting option. With a nursing background—such as an Associate Degree in Nursing—you may later advance your career with adn to np programs online and become a nurse practitioner.

Prefer the business and technology aspects of healthcare? Consider medical billing and coding schools that accept financial aid for a fast-paced, in-demand career supporting healthcare documentation and insurance processes. Each of these alternatives provides flexibility and a rewarding pathway within the broader healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan I. Epstein

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles