What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Igneous rock
- Basalt
- Geochemistry
His primary scientific interests are in Geochemistry, Zircon, Igneous rock, Pluton and Petrology.
His work carried out in the field of Geochemistry brings together such families of science as Adakite, Craton and Asthenosphere.
His work investigates the relationship between Adakite and topics such as Basalt that intersect with problems in Andesite.
In his research on the topic of Zircon, Protolith is strongly related with Gneiss.
His work in Igneous rock tackles topics such as Provenance which are related to areas like Island arc.
His Pluton research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Basement, Magmatism and Partial melting.
His most cited work include:
- Zircon U-Pb and Hf isotopic study of gneissic rocks from the Chinese Altai: Progressive accretionary history in the early to middle Palaeozoic (243 citations)
- Zircon U-Pb and Hf isotopic study of gneissic rocks from the Chinese Altai: Progressive accretionary history in the early to middle Palaeozoic (243 citations)
- Archean crustal evolution of the northern Tarim craton, NW China: Zircon U-Pb and Hf isotopic constraints (224 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Xiaoping Long spends much of his time researching Geochemistry, Zircon, Partial melting, Petrogenesis and Craton.
His Geochemistry study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Petrology and Pluton.
His Zircon research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Igneous rock, Archean, Precambrian, Gneiss and Terrane.
His studies deal with areas such as Basement and Provenance as well as Precambrian.
His Partial melting research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Andesite, Subduction, Underplating and Adakite.
His Petrogenesis research incorporates themes from Fractional crystallization, Dike, Sanukitoid and Geochronology.
He most often published in these fields:
- Geochemistry (93.12%)
- Zircon (68.12%)
- Partial melting (30.62%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2019-2021)?
- Geochemistry (93.12%)
- Zircon (68.12%)
- Craton (20.63%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Xiaoping Long mainly investigates Geochemistry, Zircon, Craton, Mafic and Crust.
He focuses mostly in the field of Geochemistry, narrowing it down to matters related to Subduction and, in some cases, Basalt.
His study in Zircon is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Metamorphic rock, Block, Metamorphism, Precambrian and Terrane.
His Craton research focuses on Archean and how it relates to Olivine and Pyroxene.
His work deals with themes such as Magmatism and Continental crust, which intersect with Mafic.
His research on Crust frequently connects to adjacent areas such as Igneous rock.
Between 2019 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Geochronology and geochemistry of Late Carboniferous dykes in the Aqishan–Yamansu belt, eastern Tianshan: Evidence for a post-collisional slab breakoff (13 citations)
- Molybdenum and boron isotopic evidence for carbon-recycling via carbonate dissolution in subduction zones (9 citations)
- Paleoproterozoic tectono-metamorphic evolution of the southernmost North China Craton: New insights from the metamorphic evolution and geochronology of the Taihua complex at Lushan area (6 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Igneous rock
- Basalt
- Subduction
His main research concerns Geochemistry, Zircon, Subduction, Mantle and Slab.
As part of his studies on Geochemistry, Xiaoping Long frequently links adjacent subjects like Oceanic crust.
His research integrates issues of Continental arc, Partial melting and Asthenosphere in his study of Oceanic crust.
His Zircon study combines topics in areas such as Tectonics, Terrane, Paleozoic, Gneiss and Hornblende.
His Mantle study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Mantle wedge and Andesites.
His studies in Slab integrate themes in fields like Pluton and Cretaceous.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
