World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
45
Citations
9885
World Ranking
3835
National Ranking
2

Anne M. Larson publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anne M. Larson sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 198 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Anne M. Larson D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anne M. Larson sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anne M. Larson is affiliated with the Center for International Forestry Research in Peru. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on Environmental Science and Social Sciences. Within these disciplines, their work touches on several subfields including Global and Planetary Change, Education, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Sociology and Political Science, and Strategy and Management.

The scientist has contributed extensively to topics such as Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management, Agriculture, Land Use, and Rural Development, Forest Management and Policy, Global trade, sustainability, and social impact, Youth Education and Societal Dynamics, Land Rights and Reforms, and Sustainability and Climate Change Governance.

Among recent notable publications are:

  • "Forest tenure and the Sustainable Development Goals - A critical view," 2020, Forest Policy and Economics
  • "Tenure reform for better forestry: An unfinished policy agenda," 2020, Forest Policy and Economics
  • "Community land formalization and company land acquisition procedures: A review of 33 procedures in 15 countries," 2020, Land Use Policy
  • "Hot topics in governance for forests and trees: Towards a (just) transformative research agenda," 2021, Forest Policy and Economics
  • "A place at the table is not enough: Accountability for Indigenous Peoples and local communities in multi-stakeholder platforms," 2022, World Development

Frequently publishing in key venues, they have contributed six papers each to Forest Policy and Economics and The International Forestry Review. Additional contributions appear in the International Journal of Lifelong Education, SSRN Electronic Journal, and Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy.

Their collaborative work includes frequent co-authorship with researchers such as Sarmiento Barletti, Niels Rosendal Jensen, I. Monterroso, Bente Jensen, and Kathryn Pitkin Derose, indicating ongoing interdisciplinary and international research partnerships.

Anne M. Larson has also authored a book titled Social ulighed set gennem uddannelse, published by Aarhus University Press in 2023.

Best Publications

  • Recentralizing while decentralizing: How national governments reappropriate forest resources

    Jesse C. Ribot;Arun Agrawal;Anne M. Larson

  • Decentralization of Natural Resource Governance Regimes

    Anne M. Larson;Fernanda Soto

  • Democratic decentralisation through a natural resource lens: an introduction

    Anne M Larson;Jesse C Ribot

  • Natural Resources and Decentralization in Nicaragua: Are Local Governments Up to the Job?

    Anne M Larson

  • The poverty of forestry policy: double standards on an uneven playing field

    Anne M. Larson;Jesse C. Ribot

  • Land tenure and REDD+: The good, the bad and the ugly

    Anne M. Larson;Maria Brockhaus;William D. Sunderlin;Amy Duchelle

  • Forest tenure reform in the age of climate change: Lessons for REDD+

    Anne M. Larson

  • How are REDD+ Proponents Addressing Tenure Problems? Evidence from Brazil, Cameroon, Tanzania, Indonesia, and Vietnam

    W.D. Sunderlin;A.M. Larson;A.E. Duchelle;I. A. P. Resosudarmo

  • Democratic decentralisation through a natural resource lens

    J.C. Ribot;A.M. Larson

  • Democratic decentralization in the forestry sector: lessons learned from Africa, Asia and Latin America.

    Anne M. Larson

  • Social safeguards and co-benefits in REDD+: a review of the adjacent possible

    Ashwini Chhatre;Shikha Lakhanpal;Anne M Larson;Fred Nelson

  • Decentralisation and forest management in Latin America: towards a working model

    Anne M. Larson;Anne M. Larson

  • Forests for People: Community Rights and Forest Tenure Reform

    A.M. Larson;D.M. Barry;G.R. Dahal;C.J.P. Colfer

  • Linking forest tenure reform, environmental compliance, and incentives: lessons from REDD+ initiatives in the Brazilian Amazon

    Amy E. Duchelle;Marina Cromberg;Maria Fernanda Gebara;Raissa Guerra

  • Messiness of forest governance: How technical approaches suppress politics in REDD+ and conservation projects

    Rodd Myers;Anne M Larson;Ashwin Ravikumar;Laura F Kowler

  • Tenure rights and beyond : community access to forest resources in Latin America

    A.M. Larson;P. Cronkleton;D.M. Barry;P. Pacheco

  • New Rights for Forest-Based Communities? Understanding Processes of Forest Tenure Reform

    A.M. Larson;D. Barry;Ganga Ram Dahal

  • An Introduction to Forest Governance, People and REDD+ in Latin America: Obstacles and Opportunities

    Anne M. Larson;Elena Petkova

  • Learning from REDD+: a response to Fletcher et al.

    Arild Angelsen;Maria Brockhaus;Amy E. Duchelle;Anne M. Larson

  • Formal Decentralisation and the Imperative of Decentralisation ‘from Below’: A Case Study of Natural Resource Management in Nicaragua

    Anne M Larson

  • Transforming REDD+: Lessons and new directions

    A. Angelsen;C. Martius;V. de Sy;A.E. Duchelle

Frequent Co-Authors

William D. Sunderlin
William D. Sunderlin Center for International Forestry Research
Christopher Martius
Christopher Martius Center for International Forestry Research, Germany
Arild Angelsen
Arild Angelsen Norwegian University of Life Sciences
Jesse C. Ribot
Jesse C. Ribot American University
Pablo Pacheco
Pablo Pacheco World Wildlife Fund
Maria Brockhaus
Maria Brockhaus University of Helsinki
Erin O. Sills
Erin O. Sills North Carolina State University
Pamela Jagger
Pamela Jagger University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Rodney J. Keenan
Rodney J. Keenan University of Melbourne
Sven Wunder
Sven Wunder European Forest Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The field of Social Sciences and Humanities offers a variety of flexible and affordable online degrees tailored to different career goals. For those interested in social work, pursuing an accelerated masters in social work can prepare you for licensure in a shorter time frame while building key practical skills.

Likewise, students looking to advance quickly in psychology can choose a fast track psychology degree online. This option is ideal for individuals eager to launch careers in counseling, research, or mental health.

When considering counseling as a profession, it’s important to ensure your program meets industry standards. Choosing from the cacrep-accredited programs is essential for aspiring licensed professional counselors, as these programs offer comprehensive, recognized training.

Those interested in helping families and couples may consider specialized online degrees. Accredited and accessible online marriage and family therapy graduate programs can lead to rewarding careers as marriage or family therapists.

Best Scientists Citing Anne M. Larson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles