World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
49
Citations
10457
World Ranking
5183
National Ranking
83

Maria Brockhaus publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maria Brockhaus sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 177 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Maria Brockhaus D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maria Brockhaus sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Maria Brockhaus is affiliated with the University of Helsinki in Finland and conducts research primarily in the fields of Environmental Science and Social Sciences. Their work spans several interconnected subfields including Global and Planetary Change, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, and Economics and Econometrics.

The scientist's research addresses topics such as Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management; Forest Management and Policy; Sustainability and Climate Change Governance; Policy Transfer and Learning; Agriculture, Land Use, and Rural Development; Cambodian History and Society; and Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development.

Recent publications by Maria Brockhaus cover a range of themes related to forest and environmental policy. These include:

  • "Social forestry in Southeast Asia: Evolving interests, discourses and the many notions of equity" (2020, Geoforum)
  • "Reviewing the evidence on the roles of forests and tree-based systems in poverty dynamics" (2021, Forest Policy and Economics)
  • "The forest frontier in the Global South: Climate change policies and the promise of development and equity" (2021, AMBIO)
  • "Unearthing the myths of global sustainable forest governance" (2020, Global Sustainability)
  • "What drives smallholder tree growing? Enabling conditions in a changing policy environment" (2020, Forest Policy and Economics)

Maria Brockhaus frequently collaborates with researchers such as Grace Wong, Niina Pietarinen, Phạm T.T., Mawa Karambiri, and Monica Di Gregorio.

The main publication venues for their work include Forest Policy and Economics, SSRN Electronic Journal, Environmental Science & Policy, AMBIO, and Global Environmental Change. Forest Policy and Economics is the most frequent venue with a total of ten publications.

In addition to articles, Brockhaus has contributed to book publications, including a title published by the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) eBooks: "Usual and unusual suspects: What network analysis can tell us about climate policy integration" (2020).

Best Publications

  • An assessment of deforestation and forest degradation drivers in developing countries

    Noriko Hosonuma;Martin Herold;Veronique De Sy;Ruth S De Fries

  • Analysing REDD+: challenges and choices.

    A. Angelsen;M. Brockhaus;W.D. Sunderlin;L.V. Verchot

  • Realising Redd+: National strategy and policy options

    A. Angelsen;M. Brockhaus;M. Kanninen;E. Sills

  • Multi-level governance and power in climate change policy networks

    Monica Di Gregorio;Monica Di Gregorio;Leandra Fatorelli;Jouni Paavola;Bruno Locatelli;Bruno Locatelli

  • Beyond dichotomies: Gender and intersecting inequalities in climate change studies.

    Houria Djoudi;Bruno Locatelli;Chloe Vaast;Kiran Asher

  • Land tenure and REDD+: The good, the bad and the ugly

    Anne M. Larson;Maria Brockhaus;William D. Sunderlin;Amy Duchelle

  • Is adaptation to climate change gender neutral? Lessons from communities dependent on livestock and forests in northern Mali

    H. Djoudi;H. Djoudi;M. Brockhaus;M. Brockhaus

  • An overview of forest and land allocation policies in Indonesia: Is the current framework sufficient to meet the needs of REDD+?

    Maria Brockhaus;Krystof Obidzinski;Ahmad Dermawan;Yves Laumonier

  • Climate policy integration in the land use sector: Mitigation, adaptation and sustainable development linkages

    Monica Di Gregorio;Monica Di Gregorio;Dodik Ridho Nurrochmat;Jouni Paavola;Intan Maya Sari

  • Who should benefit from REDD+? Rationales and realities

    Cecilia Luttrell;Lasse Loft;Maria Fernanda Gebara;Demetrius Kweka

  • Governing the design of national REDD+: an analysis of the power of agency

    M. Brockhaus;M. Di Gregorio;M. Di Gregorio;S. Mardiah

  • The political context of REDD+ in Indonesia: constituencies for change

    Cecilia Luttrell;Ida Aju Pradnja Resosudarmo;Efrian Muharrom;Maria Brockhaus

  • Facing an uncertain future: how forest and people can adapt to climate change

    Bruno Locatelli;Markku Kanninen;Maria Brockhaus;Carol J. Pierce Colfer

  • Approaches to benefit sharing: A preliminary comparative analysis of 13 REDD+ countries

    T.T. Pham;M. Brockhaus;G.Y. Wong;N.D. Le

  • Seeing REDD+ through 4Is: A political economy framework

    M. Brockhaus;A. Angelsen

  • Ecosystem services in the National Adaptation Programmes of Action

    Emilia Pramova;Bruno Locatelli;Maria Brockhaus;Sandra Fohlmeister

  • Once there was a lake: Vulnerability to environmental changes in northern Mali

    Houria Djoudi;Maria Brockhaus;Bruno Locatelli

  • Equity and REDD+ in the Media: a Comparative Analysis of Policy Discourses

    Monica Di Gregorio;Maria Brockhaus;Tim Cronin;Efrian Muharrom

  • Social Forestry – why and for whom? A comparison of policies in Vietnam and Indonesia

    Moira Moeliono;Thuy Thu Pham;Indah Waty Bong;Grace Yee Wong

  • Enabling factors for establishing REDD+ in a context of weak governance

    K. Korhonen-Kurki;J. Sehring;M. Brockhaus;M. Di Gregorio

  • Learning from REDD+: a response to Fletcher et al.

    Arild Angelsen;Maria Brockhaus;Amy E. Duchelle;Anne M. Larson

  • How countries link REDD+ interventions to drivers in their readiness plans: implications for monitoring systems

    G Salvini;M Herold;V De Sy;G Kissinger

  • Some lessons learned from the first generation of REDD+ activities

    Daniel Murdiyarso;Daniel Murdiyarso;Maria Brockhaus;William D Sunderlin;Lou Verchot

  • REDD+, transformational change and the promise of performance-based payments: a qualitative comparative analysis

    Maria Brockhaus;Kaisa Korhonen-Kurki;Jenniver Sehring;Monica Di Gregorio

  • Envisioning the future and learning from the past: adapting to a changing environment in northern Mali

    Maria Brockhaus;Houria Djoudi;Bruno Locatelli;Bruno Locatelli

Frequent Co-Authors

Monica Di Gregorio
Monica Di Gregorio University of Leeds
Bruno Locatelli
Bruno Locatelli Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement
William D. Sunderlin
William D. Sunderlin Center for International Forestry Research
Arild Angelsen
Arild Angelsen Norwegian University of Life Sciences
Markku Kanninen
Markku Kanninen University of Helsinki
Pamela Jagger
Pamela Jagger University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Louis V. Verchot
Louis V. Verchot Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical
Erin O. Sills
Erin O. Sills North Carolina State University
Daniel Murdiyarso
Daniel Murdiyarso IPB University
Christopher Martius
Christopher Martius Center for International Forestry Research, Germany

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond Environmental Sciences, various online degree options offer flexible paths for further education and career growth. Many students explore online bachelors degree programs in sociology to gain deeper insights into societal impacts on the environment and community dynamics.

Professionals seeking advanced qualifications often consider doctoral programs online no dissertation, which provide a streamlined path to a doctorate while accommodating working individuals’ schedules without the traditional dissertation requirement.

For educators aiming to elevate their careers, an eds to edd bridge program can be an ideal choice, bridging the gap between a Doctor of Education and a more research-intensive Doctor of Education degree with online flexibility.

Additionally, those focused on social work and community health may find value in researching online dsw programs, which prepare graduates for leadership roles in social and environmental justice sectors. These pathways collectively support diverse careers intersecting with environmental sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Maria Brockhaus

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles