World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Monica Di Gregorio

Monica Di Gregorio

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
25
Citations
2776
World Ranking
1619
National Ranking
268

Monica Di Gregorio publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Monica Di Gregorio sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 58 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Monica Di Gregorio D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Monica Di Gregorio sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 25 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Overview

Monica Di Gregorio is a researcher affiliated with the University of Leeds in the United Kingdom. Their work primarily focuses on environmental and social sciences, with a strong emphasis on global and planetary change, as well as political science and international relations. Their research addresses complex issues related to climate change governance, policy transfer, and sustainability.

The main fields of study in which they publish include Environmental Science and Social Sciences. Subfields frequently explored in their research are Global and Planetary Change, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, and Development.

Some of the main topics covered in their work are:

  • Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Policy Transfer and Learning
  • International Development and Aid
  • Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
  • Social Capital and Networks

Monica Di Gregorio's publication record features papers in notable academic venues, including:

  • Global Environmental Change
  • Forest Policy and Economics
  • AMBIO
  • Climate Policy
  • Policy Sciences

The following recent publications illustrate the scope of their research:

  • Building authority and legitimacy in transnational climate change governance: Evidence from the Governors' Climate and Forests Task Force, 2020, Global Environmental Change
  • The forest frontier in the Global South: Climate change policies and the promise of development and equity, 2021, AMBIO
  • Climate change policy networks: connecting adaptation and mitigation in multiplex networks in Peru, 2020, Climate Policy
  • Policy learning as complex contagion: how social networks shape organizational beliefs in forest-based climate change mitigation, 2021, Policy Sciences
  • Indicators to Evaluate the Institutional Effectiveness of National Climate Financing Mechanisms, 2020, Forest and Society

The researcher collaborates frequently with other academics, including Maria Brockhaus, Phạm T.T., Josiane Gakou-Kakeu, Jouni Paavola, and Dénis Sonwa. These collaborations point to an interdisciplinary approach involving diverse perspectives on climate change and policy innovation.

Best Publications

  • Multi-level governance and power in climate change policy networks

    Monica Di Gregorio;Monica Di Gregorio;Leandra Fatorelli;Jouni Paavola;Bruno Locatelli;Bruno Locatelli

  • Climate policy integration in the land use sector: Mitigation, adaptation and sustainable development linkages

    Monica Di Gregorio;Monica Di Gregorio;Dodik Ridho Nurrochmat;Jouni Paavola;Intan Maya Sari

  • COLLECTIVE ACTION AND PROPERTY RIGHTS FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

    Ruth Suseela Meinzen-Dick;Monica di Gregorio

  • Integrating climate change mitigation and adaptation in agriculture and forestry: opportunities and trade-offs

    Bruno Locatelli;Charlotte Pavageau;Emilia Pramova;Monica Di Gregorio

  • Equity and REDD+ in the Media: a Comparative Analysis of Policy Discourses

    Monica Di Gregorio;Maria Brockhaus;Tim Cronin;Efrian Muharrom

  • Property Rights, Collective Action, and Poverty: The Role of Institutions for Poverty Reduction

    Monica di Gregorio;Konrad Hagedorn;Michael Kirk;Benedikt Korf

  • Enabling factors for establishing REDD+ in a context of weak governance

    K. Korhonen-Kurki;J. Sehring;M. Brockhaus;M. Di Gregorio

  • REDD+ policy networks: exploring actors and power structures in an emerging policy domain

    Maria Brockhaus;Monica Di Gregorio;Rachel Carmenta

  • REDD+, transformational change and the promise of performance-based payments: a qualitative comparative analysis

    Maria Brockhaus;Kaisa Korhonen-Kurki;Jenniver Sehring;Monica Di Gregorio

  • Information networks and power: confronting the "wicked problem" of REDD+ in Indonesia

    Moira Moeliono;Caleb Gallemore;Levania Santoso;Maria Brockhaus

  • National REDD+ policy networks: from cooperation to conflict

    Maria Brockhaus;Monica Di Gregorio

  • Networking in environmental movement organisation coalitions: interest, values or discourse?

    Monica Di Gregorio

  • Transaction costs, power, and multi-level forest governance in Indonesia

    Caleb Gallemore;Monica Di Gregorio;Monica Di Gregorio;Moira Moeliono;Maria Brockhaus

  • The REDD+ policy arena in Vietnam: participation of policy actors

    Thuy T. Pham;Monica Di Gregorio;Rachel Carmenta;Maria Brockhaus;Maria Brockhaus

  • The forest frontier in the Global South: Climate change policies and the promise of development and equity

    Maria Brockhaus;Maria Brockhaus;Monica Di Gregorio;Houria Djoudi;Moira Moeliono

  • COLLECTIVE ACTION AND PROPERTY RIGHTS FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: OVERVIEW

    Ruth Suseela Meinzen-Dick;Monica di Gregorio

  • Advocacy coalitions, REDD+, and forest governance in Papua New Guinea: how likely is transformational change?

    Andrea Babon;Dan McIntyre;Gae Y. Gowae;Caleb Tyrell Gallemore

  • Multistakeholder environmental governance in action: REDD+ discourse coalitions in Tanzania

    Salla Rantala;Monica Di Gregorio

  • Deadlock or Transformational Change?: Exploring Public Discourse on REDD+ Across Seven Countries

    Monica Di Gregorio;Maria Brockhaus;Tim Cronin;Efrian Muharrom

  • What drives policy change for REDD+?: A qualitative comparative analysis of the interplay between institutional and policy arena factors

    Kaisa Korhonen-Kurki;Kaisa Korhonen-Kurki;Maria Brockhaus;Jenniver Sehring;Jenniver Sehring;Monica Di Gregorio;Monica Di Gregorio

  • Climate variability and flexibility in resource access: the case of pastoral mobility in Northern Kenya

    Nancy Mccarthy;Monica Di Gregorio

  • How institutions and beliefs affect environmental discourse: Evidence from an eight-country survey on REDD+

    Monica Di Gregorio;Monica Di Gregorio;Caleb Tyrell Gallemore;Maria Brockhaus;Maria Brockhaus;Leandra Fatorelli

  • Decentralization, Pro-Poor Land Policies, and Democratic Governance

    Ruth Suseela Meinzen-Dick;Monica di Gregorio;Stephan Dohrn

Frequent Co-Authors

Maria Brockhaus
Maria Brockhaus University of Helsinki
Ruth Meinzen-Dick
Ruth Meinzen-Dick International Food Policy Research Institute
Bruno Locatelli
Bruno Locatelli Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement
Jouni Paavola
Jouni Paavola University of Leeds
Heike Schroeder
Heike Schroeder University of East Anglia
Martin Herold
Martin Herold Wageningen University & Research
Sven Wunder
Sven Wunder European Forest Institute
Brent Swallow
Brent Swallow University of Alberta
Benedikt Korf
Benedikt Korf University of Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Political Science in the USA can open the door to diverse fields, both within and beyond government and public affairs. One common pathway is combining political science with history majors in college, which provides a rich perspective for careers in education, law, or research.

With the rise of flexible learning, many students now consider interdisciplinary studies online programs. These programs blend political science with subjects like sociology, economics, or communications—broadening career opportunities for graduates in various sectors.

If you want to specialize further, pursuing online master's in history programs is an effective route. A master's degree can lead to roles in academia, archival research, or policy analysis, enhanced by the advanced writing and analytical skills developed.

For those seeking a faster return on investment, there are also fastest certifications to get. These credentials can quickly boost your employability, offering pathways into fields like public administration, data analysis, or project management, making them a practical complement to your political science background.

Best Scientists Citing Monica Di Gregorio

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles