World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 50 5016 4805 177 171 293 8887

Tek Narayan Maraseni publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tek Narayan Maraseni between 2004 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tek Narayan Maraseni published across 23 years, from 2004 to 2026, averaging 17.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 46 publications in 2024. 38 of the 404 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 46. Peak 46 publications in 2024. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 7 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 22 publications 2015: 23 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 30 publications 2018: 24 publications 2019: 20 publications 2020: 20 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 33 publications 2023: 33 publications 2024: 46 publications 2025: 35 publications 2026: 3 publications
2004 2026

404 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tek Narayan Maraseni: publications per year, 2004 to 2026
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 7
2006 5
2007 6
2008 6
2009 9
2010 12
2011 9
2012 17
2013 15
2014 22
2015 23
2016 9
2017 30
2018 24
2019 20
2020 20
2021 19
2022 33
2023 33
2024 46
2025 35
2026 3
Total 404
Download as CSV

Tek Narayan Maraseni publications per year - data summary

  • Tek Narayan Maraseni, a Environmental Sciences scholar from University of Southern Queensland, has 404 publications recorded across 23 years, from 2004 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2004 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2024, with 46 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 2004, with 1 publication.
  • The rate of publication averages 17.6 papers per year over the whole span, or 17.6 per year counting only the 23 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 150 publications, 37% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2004-2011: 55 publications (6.9 per year); 2012-2019: 160 publications (20.0 per year); 2020-2026: 189 publications (27.0 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Tek Narayan Maraseni publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tek Narayan Maraseni sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 291–300 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 293 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127 293
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Tek Narayan Maraseni publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 9,676 Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 66 ranges running from 41–50 to 690+ publications.
  • Tek Narayan Maraseni, a Environmental Sciences scholar from University of Southern Queensland, records 293 publications - the 85th percentile of the discipline.
  • 85% of ranked Environmental Sciences scientists score the same or lower than Tek Narayan Maraseni, and about 15% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 161–170 publications range, and Tek Narayan Maraseni ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 121–130 publications, holding 617 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 67% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 690 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Tek Narayan Maraseni D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tek Narayan Maraseni sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263 50
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Tek Narayan Maraseni D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 9,676 Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 30 to 126+ D-Index.
  • Tek Narayan Maraseni, a Environmental Sciences scholar from University of Southern Queensland, records 50 D-Index - the 50th percentile of the discipline.
  • 50% of ranked Environmental Sciences scientists score the same or lower than Tek Narayan Maraseni, and about 50% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 51 D-Index range, and Tek Narayan Maraseni ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 45 D-Index, holding 348 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 54 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more, 92 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Tek Narayan Maraseni is affiliated with the University of Southern Queensland in Australia. The primary domain of their research is Environmental Science, with a significant focus on subfields such as Global and Planetary Change, Economics and Econometrics, Ecology, Sociology and Political Science, and Environmental Engineering.

Their work covers a broad spectrum of topics including:

  • Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Forest Management and Policy
  • Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
  • Energy and Environment Impacts
  • Economic and Environmental Valuation

Maraseni has published extensively in various academic venues. The most frequent publication outlets include:

  • Land Use Policy
  • Journal of Environmental Management
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Sustainability

Among recent papers by Maraseni and their co-authors are:

  • "Assay of renewable energy transition: A systematic literature review," 2022, The Science of The Total Environment
  • "How much do we know about trade-offs in ecosystem services? A systematic review of empirical research observations," 2021, The Science of The Total Environment
  • "Implementation effect of municipal solid waste mandatory sorting policy in Shanghai," 2021, Journal of Environmental Management
  • "Response and resilience of Asian agrifood systems to COVID-19: An assessment across twenty-five countries and four regional farming and food systems," 2021, Agricultural Systems
  • "Carbon smart agriculture: An integrated regional approach offers significant potential to increase profit and resource use efficiency, and reduce emissions," 2020, Journal of Cleaner Production

Tek Narayan Maraseni's collaborations involve several frequent co-authors, including:

  • Armando Apan
  • Kishor Aryal
  • Hari Prasad Pandey
  • Utsav Bhattarai
  • Laxmi Prasad Devkota

In addition to articles, Maraseni has contributed to book publications, with at least one book released through Springer International Publishing titled "Agriculture, Natural Resources and Food Security" published in 2022.

Best Publications

  • Climate change, poverty and livelihoods: adaptation practices by rural mountain communities in Nepal

    Popular Gentle;Tek Narayan Maraseni

  • Estimation and mapping of above-ground biomass of mangrove forests and their replacement land uses in the Philippines using Sentinel imagery

    Jose Alan A. Castillo;Armando A. Apan;Tek N. Maraseni;Severino G. Salmo

  • Soil moisture forecasting by a hybrid machine learning technique: ELM integrated with ensemble empirical mode decomposition

    Ramendra Prasad;Ravinesh C. Deo;Yan Li;Tek Maraseni

  • Global trend of forest ecosystem services valuation – An analysis of publications

    Ram Prasad Acharya;Tek Maraseni;Geoff Cockfield

  • Input selection and performance optimization of ANN-based streamflow forecasts in the drought-prone Murray Darling Basin region using IIS and MODWT algorithm

    Ramendra Prasad;Ravinesh C. Deo;Yan Li;Tek Maraseni

  • An international comparison of rice consumption behaviours and greenhouse gas emissions from rice production

    Tek Narayan Maraseni;Tek Narayan Maraseni;Ravinesh C. Deo;Jiansheng Qu;Popular Gentle;Popular Gentle

  • An assessment of the impacts of the REDD+ pilot project on community forests user groups (CFUGs) and their community forests in Nepal

    T.N. Maraseni;P R Neupane;Federico Lopez-Casero;T. Cadman

  • Vulnerability of Himalayan transhumant communities to climate change

    Suman Aryal;Geoff Cockfield;Tek Narayan Maraseni

  • How much do we know about trade-offs in ecosystem services? A systematic review of empirical research observations.

    Kishor Aryal;Tek N. Maraseni;Tek N. Maraseni;Armando Apan

  • Predicting the distributions of predator (snow leopard) and prey (blue sheep) under climate change in the Himalaya

    Achyut Aryal;Achyut Aryal;Uttam Babu Shrestha;Weihong Ji;Som B. Ale;Som B. Ale

  • Weekly soil moisture forecasting with multivariate sequential, ensemble empirical mode decomposition and Boruta-random forest hybridizer algorithm approach

    Ramendra Prasad;Ravinesh C. Deo;Yan Li;Tek Maraseni

  • Multi-layer perceptron hybrid model integrated with the firefly optimizer algorithm for windspeed prediction of target site using a limited set of neighboring reference station data

    Ravinesh C. Deo;Mohammad Ali Ghorbani;Mohammad Ali Ghorbani;Saeed Samadianfard;Tek Maraseni

  • Energy and water tradeoffs in enhancing food security: a selective international assessment

    Shahbaz Mushtaq;Tek Narayan Maraseni;Jerry Maroulis;Mohsin Hafeez

  • Household carbon dioxide emissions from peasants and herdsmen in northwestern arid-alpine regions, China

    Jiansheng Qu;Jiansheng Qu;Jingjing Zeng;Yan Li;Qin Wang

  • Does the adoption of zero tillage reduce greenhouse gas emissions? An assessment for the grains industry in Australia

    T.N. Maraseni;G. Cockfield

  • Assessing the roles of community forestry in climate change mitigation and adaptation: a case study from Nepal

    Shiva Shankar Pandey;Geoff Cockfield;Tek Narayan Maraseni

  • Implementation effect of municipal solid waste mandatory sorting policy in Shanghai.

    Yao Wang;Yu Shi;Jizhi Zhou;Jun Zhao

  • Improving SPI-derived drought forecasts incorporating synoptic-scale climate indices in multi-phase multivariate empirical mode decomposition model hybridized with simulated annealing and kernel ridge regression algorithms

    Mumtaz Ali;Ravinesh C. Deo;Tek Maraseni;Nathan J. Downs

  • Greenhouse gas emissions from rice farming inputs: a cross-country assessment

    T.N. Maraseni;Shahbaz Mushtaq;J. Maroulis

  • An assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from the Australian vegetables industry

    Tek N. Maraseni;Geoff Cockfield;Jerry Maroulis;Guangnan Chen

  • Five years of REDD+ governance: The use of market mechanisms as a response to anthropogenic climate change

    Timothy Cadman;Tek Maraseni;Hwan Ok Ma;Federico Lopez-Casero

  • Comparing the financial returns from acacia plantations with different plantation densities and rotation ages in Vietnam

    Tek Narayan Maraseni;Hoang Lien Son;Geoff Cockfield;Hung Vu Duy

Frequent Co-Authors

Ravinesh C. Deo
Ravinesh C. Deo University of Southern Queensland
Jochen Bundschuh
Jochen Bundschuh University of Southern Queensland
Mumtaz Ali
Mumtaz Ali University of Southern Queensland
Guangren Qian
Guangren Qian Shanghai University
Benjamin L. Allen
Benjamin L. Allen University of Southern Queensland
Talal Yusaf
Talal Yusaf Aviation Australia
Paul Dargusch
Paul Dargusch University of Queensland
Stuart R. Phinn
Stuart R. Phinn University of Queensland
David Raubenheimer
David Raubenheimer University of Sydney
Rodney J. Keenan
Rodney J. Keenan University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond Environmental Sciences, numerous online degrees offer flexible and affordable pathways. Students seeking advanced education may explore online edd no dissertation programs, which provide a streamlined doctoral journey without the traditional dissertation hurdle.

Educators looking to advance their credentials can consider transitioning through eds to edd programs, designed to help professionals move efficiently from a master's to a doctoral level online.

For those interested in social impact careers, exploring fully funded dsw programs can be an excellent option. These programs offer a practical route to leadership roles in social work, often with financial support to ease the burden of tuition.

Additionally, students on a budget might find a budget friendly online general studies degree beneficial, providing broad academic training with lower costs and flexible scheduling. This path can complement environmental studies by broadening knowledge in multiple disciplines.

Best Scientists Citing Tek Narayan Maraseni

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles