World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Brett A. Bryan

Brett A. Bryan

Award Badge
Environmental Sciences
Australia
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
69
Citations
17069
World Ranking
1795
National Ranking
81

Brett A. Bryan publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brett A. Bryan sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 238 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Brett A. Bryan D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brett A. Bryan sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Australia Leader Award

Overview

Brett A. Bryan is affiliated with Deakin University in Australia and has a primary focus in Environmental Science. Their research spans several subfields including Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Environmental Engineering, Economics and Econometrics, and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law.

Their work addresses numerous topics, notably:

  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Climate change impacts on agriculture
  • Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Remote Sensing in Agriculture

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Brett A. Bryan include:

  • Future global urban water scarcity and potential solutions, 2021, Nature Communications
  • Innovation can accelerate the transition towards a sustainable food system, 2020, Nature Food
  • Stronger policy required to substantially reduce deaths from PM2.5 pollution in China, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Articulating the effect of food systems innovation on the Sustainable Development Goals, 2020, The Lancet Planetary Health
  • Mapping global lake dynamics reveals the emerging roles of small lakes, 2022, Nature Communications

Brett A. Bryan frequently collaborates with several researchers. Among their most frequent co-authors are Enayat A. Moallemi, Michalis Hadjikakou, Lei Gao, Raymundo Marcos-Martinez, and Michael Obersteiner.

Their publications commonly appear in venues such as:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Nature Communications
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • One Earth
  • Nature Food

Best Publications

  • Future global urban water scarcity and potential solutions.

    Chunyang He;Zhifeng Liu;Jianguo Wu;Jianguo Wu;Xinhao Pan

  • China’s response to a national land-system sustainability emergency

    Brett A Bryan;Brett A Bryan;Lei Gao;Yangqiong Ye;Yangqiong Ye;Xiufeng Sun;Xiufeng Sun

  • Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services

    Christopher M. Raymond;Christopher M. Raymond;Brett A. Bryan;Darla Hatton MacDonald;Andrea Cast;Andrea Cast

  • Innovation can accelerate the transition towards a sustainable food system

    Mario Herrero;Philip K. Thornton;Daniel Mason-D’Croz;Jeda Palmer

  • Finding pathways to national-scale land-sector sustainability

    Lei Gao;Brett A. Bryan;Brett A. Bryan

  • Stronger policy required to substantially reduce deaths from PM2.5 pollution in China.

    Huanbi Yue;Chunyang He;Qingxu Huang;Dan Yin

  • Targeting the management of ecosystem services based on social values: Where, what, and how?

    Brett A. Bryan;Christopher M. Raymond;Christopher M. Raymond;Neville D. Crossman;Darla Hatton Macdonald

  • Articulating the effect of food systems innovation on the Sustainable Development Goals

    Mario Herrero;Philip K. Thornton;Daniel Mason-D'Croz;Jeda Palmer

  • Making decisions for managing ecosystem services

    Maria Jose Martinez-Harms;Brett A. Bryan;Patricia Balvanera;Elizabeth A. Law

  • Incorporating climate change into ecosystem service assessments and decisions: A review

    Rebecca K. Runting;Brett A. Bryan;Laura E. Dee;Fleur J. F. Maseyk

  • Achieving the sustainable development goals requires transdisciplinary innovation at the local scale

    Enayat Allah Moallemi;Shirin Malekpour;Michalis Hadjikakou;Rob Raven

  • Identifying cost-effective hotspots for restoring natural capital and enhancing landscape multifunctionality

    Neville D. Crossman;Brett A. Bryan

  • Incentives, land use, and ecosystem services: Synthesizing complex linkages

    Brett A. Bryan

  • Potential impact of climate change on wheat yield in South Australia

    Qunying Luo;William Bellotti;Martin Williams;Brett Bryan

  • Australia is ‘free to choose’ economic growth and falling environmental pressures

    Steve Hatfield-Dodds;Heinz Schandl;Philip D. Adams;Timothy M. Baynes

  • Comparing spatially explicit ecological and social values for natural areas to identify effective conservation strategies.

    Brett Anthony Bryan;Christopher Mark Raymond;Neville David Crossman;Darran King

  • Species vulnerability to climate change: impacts on spatial conservation priorities and species representation

    David M Summers;Brett A Bryan;Neville D Crossman;Waynes S Meyer

  • Land-use change impacts on ecosystem services value: Incorporating the scarcity effects of supply and demand dynamics

    Brett A. Bryan;Yanqiong Ye;Jia'en Zhang;Jeffery D. Connor

  • Landscape futures analysis: Assessing the impacts of environmental targets under alternative spatial policy options and future scenarios

    Brett A. Bryan;Neville D. Crossman;Darran King;Wayne S. Meyer

  • Carbon payments and low-cost conservation

    Neville D. Crossman;Brett A. Bryan;David M. Summers

  • Exploring the cost effectiveness of land conservation auctions and payment policies

    Jeffery D. Connor;John R. Ward;Brett Bryan

Frequent Co-Authors

Kerrie A. Wilson
Kerrie A. Wilson Queensland University of Technology
Wayne S. Meyer
Wayne S. Meyer University of Adelaide
Enli Wang
Enli Wang Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Jonathan R. Rhodes
Jonathan R. Rhodes University of Queensland
Jianguo Wu
Jianguo Wu Arizona State University
Paul Graham
Paul Graham University of Sussex
Martin Williams
Martin Williams University of Adelaide
Christopher M. Raymond
Christopher M. Raymond University of Helsinki
Hugh P. Possingham
Hugh P. Possingham University of Queensland
Andreas T. Ernst
Andreas T. Ernst Monash University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students pursuing Environmental Sciences in the USA, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities and enhance expertise. Programs such as the dsw programs offer advanced study options that complement environmental policy and community health fields, creating impactful leadership roles.

Those seeking flexibility and affordability may consider an online general studies bachelor degree cheap. This pathway allows students to tailor their curriculum to include interdisciplinary environmental topics while maintaining cost-effective education.

For individuals prioritizing ease of completion with a relevant skill set, exploring the easiest bachelor degree programs can be useful. Some of these focus on foundational science and policy principles valuable in environmental careers.

Specialized degrees like a geoscience online degree provide in-depth knowledge of Earth systems, essential for roles in environmental consulting, natural resource management, and sustainability initiatives.

Best Scientists Citing Brett A. Bryan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles