World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Christopher M. Raymond

Christopher M. Raymond

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 59 3032 2898 46 46 125 18318

Christopher M. Raymond publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Christopher M. Raymond between 2005 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Christopher M. Raymond published across 22 years, from 2005 to 2026, averaging 9.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 37 publications in 2022. 27 of the 213 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 37. Peak 37 publications in 2022. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 5 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 10 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 37 publications 2023: 24 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 26 publications 2026: 1 publication
2005 2026

213 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Christopher M. Raymond: publications per year, 2005 to 2026
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 3
2007 2
2008 0
2009 1
2010 5
2011 6
2012 1
2013 10
2014 6
2015 6
2016 8
2017 11
2018 12
2019 12
2020 14
2021 13
2022 37
2023 24
2024 14
2025 26
2026 1
Total 213
Download as CSV

Christopher M. Raymond publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christopher M. Raymond sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 125 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617 125
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Christopher M. Raymond D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christopher M. Raymond sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177 59
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Christopher M. Raymond is affiliated with the University of Helsinki in Finland. Their research spans multiple fields within environmental and social sciences, with extensive contributions in Environmental Science and Social Sciences.

Their scholarly output includes publications in key subfields such as Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, and Nature and Landscape Conservation.

Christopher M. Raymond's main topics of research cover diverse areas, including:

  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Urban Green Space and Health
  • Environmental Education and Sustainability
  • Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
  • Place Attachment and Urban Studies

Among recent publications are:

  • "Diverse values of nature for sustainability," 2023, Nature
  • "Radical changes are needed for transformations to a good Anthropocene," 2021, npj Urban Sustainability
  • "Mapping place values: 10 lessons from two decades of public participation GIS empirical research," 2020, Applied Geography
  • "Disconnection from nature: Expanding our understanding of human-nature relations," 2023, People and Nature
  • "A methodological framework for analysis of participatory mapping data in research, planning, and management," 2021, International Journal of Geographical Information Systems

Christopher M. Raymond's frequent co-authors include:

  • Anton Stahl Olafsson
  • Christopher B. Anderson
  • Simone Athayde
  • Arild Vatn
  • Natalie Marie Gulsrud

The scientist has contributed to publications in several venues, notably:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • npj Urban Sustainability
  • People and Nature
  • Sustainability Science
  • Ecosystems and People

In addition to journal articles, Christopher M. Raymond has authored book publications. One such book is "Changing Senses of Place," published in 2021 by Cambridge University Press.

Best Publications

  • What is social learning

    Mark Reed;Mark Reed;Anna Clair Evely;Georgina Cundill;Ioan Fazey

  • Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management

    Christopher M. Raymond;Ioan Fazey;Mark S. Reed;Lindsay C. Stringer

  • The measurement of place attachment: Personal, community, and environmental connections

    Christopher M. Raymond;Gregory Brown;Delene Weber

  • A framework for assessing and implementing the co-benefits of nature-based solutions in urban areas

    Christopher M. Raymond;Niki Frantzeskaki;Nadja Kabisch;Pam Berry

  • The relationship between place attachment and landscape values: Toward mapping place attachment

    Gregory Brown;Gregory Brown;Christopher Raymond

  • Weaving knowledge systems in IPBES, CBD and beyond—lessons learned for sustainability

    Maria Tengö;Rosemary Hill;Pernilla Malmer;Christopher M Raymond

  • Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services

    Christopher M. Raymond;Christopher M. Raymond;Brett A. Bryan;Darla Hatton MacDonald;Andrea Cast;Andrea Cast

  • Human–nature connection : a multidisciplinary review

    Christopher D Ives;Christopher D Ives;Matteo Giusti;Jörn Fischer;David James Abson

  • Methods for identifying land use conflict potential using participatory mapping

    Greg Brown;Greg Brown;Christopher M. Raymond

  • Ecosystem Services and Beyond: Using Multiple Metaphors to Understand Human–Environment Relationships

    Christopher M. Raymond;Gerald G. Singh;Karina Benessaiah;Joanna R. Bernhardt

  • The role of cultural ecosystem services in landscape management and planning

    Tobias Plieninger;Claudia Bieling;Nora Fagerholm;Nora Fagerholm;Anja Byg

  • Targeting the management of ecosystem services based on social values: Where, what, and how?

    Brett A. Bryan;Christopher M. Raymond;Christopher M. Raymond;Neville D. Crossman;Darla Hatton Macdonald

  • Mapping and measuring place attachment

    Greg Brown;Christopher M. Raymond;Christopher M. Raymond;Christopher M. Raymond;Jonathan Corcoran

  • The influence of place attachment, and moral and normative concerns on the conservation of native vegetation: a test of two behavioural models

    Christopher M. Raymond;Gregory Brown;Guy M. Robinson

  • Comparing instrumental and deliberative paradigms underpinning the assessment of social values for cultural ecosystem services

    Christopher M. Raymond;Christopher M. Raymond;Jasper O. Kenter;Tobias Plieninger;Nancy J. Turner

  • Radical changes are needed for transformations to a good Anthropocene

    Timon McPhearson;Timon McPhearson;Timon McPhearson;Christopher M. Raymond;Natalie Gulsrud;Christian Albert

  • Shared values and deliberative valuation: Future directions

    Jasper O. Kenter;Rosalind Bryce;Michael Christie;Nigel Cooper

  • Loving the mess : navigating diversity and conflict in social values for sustainability

    Jasper O. Kenter;Christopher M. Raymond;Carena J. van Riper;Elaine Azzopardi

  • Comparing spatially explicit ecological and social values for natural areas to identify effective conservation strategies.

    Brett Anthony Bryan;Christopher Mark Raymond;Neville David Crossman;Darran King

  • Cross-scale monitoring and assessment of land degradation and sustainable land management: A methodological framework for knowledge management

    M. S. Reed;M. Buenemann;J. Atlhopheng;M. Akhtar-Schuster

  • A Spatial Method for Assessing Resident and Visitor Attitudes Towards Tourism Growth and Development

    Christopher Raymond;Gregory Brown

Frequent Co-Authors

Tobias Plieninger
Tobias Plieninger University of Göttingen
Alex M. Lechner
Alex M. Lechner Monash University
Greg Brown
Greg Brown California Polytechnic State University
Mark Reed
Mark Reed Scotland's Rural College
Dave Kendal
Dave Kendal University of Melbourne
Berta Martín-López
Berta Martín-López Leuphana University of Lüneburg
Stephan Barthel
Stephan Barthel Stockholm Resilience Centre
Brett A. Bryan
Brett A. Bryan Deakin University
Lindsay C. Stringer
Lindsay C. Stringer University of York
Ioan Fazey
Ioan Fazey University of York

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens the door to diverse career paths that often intersect with public policy, social sciences, and education. For those interested in leadership roles within government or non-profits, pursuing one of the best online masters in public administration can be a strategic next step. This degree enhances skills in management and policy-making crucial for addressing environmental challenges.

Understanding societal impacts on environmental issues is equally important. Online programs such as the best online sociology bachelor degree provide valuable insights into human behavior and social structures, complementing an environmental science background.

For professionals aiming to advance in academia or educational leadership, the availability of online edd programs no dissertation offer flexible options to earn a Doctor of Education without the traditional research barrier. Additionally, those holding an EdS degree can explore eds to edd bridge programs online to further their qualifications conveniently.

By combining Environmental Sciences with these related online degrees, students can tailor their career trajectories to meet evolving global and community needs.

Best Scientists Citing Christopher M. Raymond

Trending Scientists