World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Lindsay C. Stringer

Lindsay C. Stringer

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
77
Citations
26344
World Ranking
1121
National Ranking
87

Lindsay C. Stringer publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lindsay C. Stringer sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 288 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Lindsay C. Stringer D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lindsay C. Stringer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lindsay C. Stringer is affiliated with the University of York in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with significant contributions spanning 171 publications in this field. Within this broad domain, their work is notably concentrated in several subfields, including Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Sociology and Political Science, Ecology, and Soil Science.

Themes central to Stringer's research encompass Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management; Land Use and Ecosystem Services; Climate Change impacts on agriculture; Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology; Climate Change, Adaptation, and Migration; Sustainability and Climate Change Governance; and Agricultural Innovations and Practices.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Stringer include Changjia Li, Martin Dallimer, Andrew J. Dougill, Shuai Wang, and Wenxin Zhou.

Key publication venues featuring Stringer's work comprise Anthropocene Science, Land, One Earth, PLoS ONE, and Restoration Ecology.

Recent notable papers authored or coauthored by Stringer include:

  • "Drivers and impacts of changes in China's drylands," 2021, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment
  • "A systematic global stocktake of evidence on human adaptation to climate change," 2021, Nature Climate Change
  • "Improving the effectiveness of agricultural extension services in supporting farmers to adapt to climate change: Insights from northeastern Ghana," 2021, Climate Risk Management
  • "Climate change impacts on water security in global drylands," 2021, One Earth
  • "Climate change research and action must look beyond 2100," 2021, Global Change Biology

Best Publications

  • Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management.

    Mark S. Reed;Anil Graves;Norman Dandy;Helena Posthumus

  • What is social learning

    Mark Reed;Mark Reed;Anna Clair Evely;Georgina Cundill;Ioan Fazey

  • Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management

    Christopher M. Raymond;Ioan Fazey;Mark S. Reed;Lindsay C. Stringer

  • Unpacking “Participation” in the Adaptive Management of Social–ecological Systems: a Critical Review

    Lindsay C. Stringer;Andrew J. Dougill;Evan Fraser;Klaus Hubacek

  • Drivers and impacts of changes in China’s drylands

    Changjia Li;Bojie Fu;Shuai Wang;Lindsay C. Stringer

  • A systematic global stocktake of evidence on human adaptation to climate change

    Lea Berrang-Ford;A. R. Siders;Alexandra Lesnikowski;Alexandra Paige Fischer

  • Adaptations to climate change, drought and desertification: local insights to enhance policy in southern Africa

    Lindsay C. Stringer;Jen C. Dyer;Mark S. Reed;Andrew J. Dougill

  • Five principles for the practice of knowledge exchange in environmental management.

    M. S. Reed;L. C. Stringer;I. Fazey;A. C. Evely

  • Mapping the vulnerability of crop production to drought in Ghana using rainfall, yield and socioeconomic data

    Philip Antwi-Agyei;Philip Antwi-Agyei;Evan D.G. Fraser;Evan D.G. Fraser;Andrew J. Dougill;Lindsay C. Stringer

  • Summary for policymakers of the regional assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services for Africa of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services

    E. Archer;L.E. Dziba;K.J. Mulongoy;Maoela

  • Knowledge exchange: a review and research agenda for environmental management

    Ioan Fazey;Anna C. Evely;Mark S. Reed;Lindsay C. Stringer

  • Using Principal Component Analysis for information-rich socio-ecological vulnerability mapping in Southern Africa

    David J. Abson;Andrew J. Dougill;Lindsay C. Stringer

  • How does the context and design of participatory decision making processes affect their outcomes? Evidence from sustainable land management in global drylands

    Joris de Vente;Mark S. Reed;Lindsay C. Stringer;Sandra Valente

  • Environmental change in moorland landscapes.

    J. Holden;L. Shotbolt;A. Bonn;T. P. Burt

  • Resilient or vulnerable livelihoods? Assessing livelihood dynamics and trajectories in rural Botswana.

    Susannah M. Sallu;Chasca Twyman;Lindsay C. Stringer

  • Combining analytical frameworks to assess livelihood vulnerability to climate change and analyse adaptation options

    M S Reed;G Podesta;I Fazey;N Geeson

  • Participatory scenario development for environmental management: a methodological framework illustrated with experience from the UK uplands

    M.S. Reed;J. Kenter;A. Bonn;A. Bonn;K. Broad

  • Learning from Doing Participatory Rural Research: Lessons from the Peak District National Park

    A J Dougill;E.D.G. Fraser;J. Holden;K Hubacek

  • Adaptation and development pathways for different types of farmers

    Lindsay Stringer;Evan Fraser;David Harris;David Harris;Christopher Lyon

  • Governing long-term social–ecological change: what can the adaptive management and transition management approaches learn from each other?

    Timothy J. Foxon;Mark S. Reed;Lindsay C. Stringer

  • Improving the effectiveness of agricultural extension services in supporting farmers to adapt to climate change: Insights from northeastern Ghana

    Philip Antwi-Agyei;Lindsay Carman Stringer

  • Research, part of a Special Feature on Resilience and Vulnerability of Arid and Semi-Arid Social Ecological Systems Resilient or Vulnerable Livelihoods? Assessing Livelihood Dynamics and Trajectories in Rural Botswana

    Susannah M. Sallu;Chasca Twyman;Lindsay C. Stringer

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew J. Dougill
Andrew J. Dougill University of York
Mark Reed
Mark Reed Scotland's Rural College
Evan D. G. Fraser
Evan D. G. Fraser University of Guelph
Klaus Hubacek
Klaus Hubacek University of Groningen
Martin Dallimer
Martin Dallimer University of Leeds
Joseph Holden
Joseph Holden University of Leeds
Ioan Fazey
Ioan Fazey University of York
Aletta Bonn
Aletta Bonn Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Sigrid Stagl
Sigrid Stagl Vienna University of Economics and Business
Tim Burt
Tim Burt Durham University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their environmental science expertise, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Programs such as the best online eds to edd programs offer advanced education opportunities for professionals aiming to integrate leadership and educational perspectives into environmental careers.

Additionally, interdisciplinary fields like social work intersect with environmental concerns. Pursuing online dsw programs in social work prepares graduates to address community and social challenges related to environmental justice and sustainability.

For students seeking flexibility and a broad foundation, an accredited affordable online general studies degree can provide versatile skills applicable to various environmental sectors, from policy to research.

Those new to higher education or balancing other commitments might consider the what is the easiest bachelor's degree to get to kickstart their academic journey in related fields, opening doors to further specialization in environmental sciences or allied areas.

Best Scientists Citing Lindsay C. Stringer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles