World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
89
Citations
30199
World Ranking
499
National Ranking
72

James D. Ford publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James D. Ford sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 269 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

James D. Ford D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James D. Ford sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

James D. Ford is affiliated with the University of Leeds in the United Kingdom and focuses primarily on research within the social sciences, with significant contributions to sociology and political science, general health professions, and global and planetary change. Their work intersects with health and atmospheric science, reflecting an interdisciplinary approach to understanding complex societal and environmental challenges.

Ford's recent publications cover critical topics related to climate change, adaptation, and indigenous knowledge. Notable papers include:

  • The 2024 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: facing record-breaking threats from delayed action (2024, The Lancet)
  • The Resilience of Indigenous Peoples to Environmental Change (2020, One Earth)
  • Indigenous knowledge on climate change adaptation: a global evidence map of academic literature (2020, Environmental Research Letters)
  • Sea level rise risks and societal adaptation benefits in low-lying coastal areas (2022, Scientific Reports)
  • Climate change adaptation in aquaculture (2020, Reviews in Aquaculture)

Their publication record shows active participation in various academic venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • Environmental Research Letters
  • Gastroenterology
  • One Earth
  • The Lancet Planetary Health
  • Sustainability

James D. Ford collaborates regularly with multiple researchers, including Sherilee L. Harper, Tristan Pearce, Carol Zavaleta-Cortijo, Eranga K. Galappaththi, and Lea Berrang-Ford, highlighting a networked research environment that spans environmental and health-related topics.

The main topics of their research include:

  • Indigenous Studies and Ecology
  • Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration
  • Arctic and Russian Policy Studies
  • Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Climate change impacts on agriculture
  • Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Climate Change and Health Impacts

This thematic concentration aligns with the fields of study in which Ford publishes, demonstrating a focus on the social dimensions of environmental change, indigenous resilience, and public health impacts arising from climate shifts. The scope of their work entails examining adaptive strategies and the societal benefits or risks associated with environmental transformations, particularly in vulnerable communities.

Best Publications

  • Climate change 2007 : impacts, adaptation and vulnerability : Working Group II contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

    Tarekegn Abeku;Pamela Abuodha;Francis Adesina;Neil Adger

  • Are we adapting to climate change

    Lea Berrang-Ford;James D. Ford;Jaclyn Paterson

  • Technical Summary: Global warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty

    M. Allen;P. Antwi-Agyei;F. Aragon-Durand;M. Babiker

  • A Framework for Assessing the Vulnerability of Communities in the Canadian Arctic to Risks Associated with Climate Change

    James D. Ford;Barry Smit

  • Vulnerability to climate change in the Arctic: A case study from Arctic Bay, Canada

    James D. Ford;Barry Smit;Johanna Wandel

  • A systematic review of observed climate change adaptation in developed nations

    James D. Ford;Lea Berrang-Ford;Jaclyn Paterson

  • A systematic global stocktake of evidence on human adaptation to climate change

    Lea Berrang-Ford;A. R. Siders;Alexandra Lesnikowski;Alexandra Paige Fischer

  • Including indigenous knowledge and experience in IPCC assessment reports

    James D. Ford;Laura Cameron;Jennifer Rubis;Michelle Maillet

  • Strengthening and Implementing the Global Response

    Heleen de Coninck;A. Revi;M. Babiker;P. Bertoldi

  • Systematic review approaches for climate change adaptation research

    Lea Berrang-Ford;Tristan Pearce;Tristan Pearce;James D. Ford

  • Case study and analogue methodologies in climate change vulnerability research.

    James D. Ford;E. C. H. Keskitalo;Tanya Smith;Tristan Pearce

  • Climate change adaptation planning in large cities: A systematic global assessment

    Malcolm Araos;Lea Berrang-Ford;James D. Ford;Stephanie E. Austin

  • "From this place and of this place:" climate change, sense of place, and health in Nunatsiavut, Canada.

    Ashlee Cunsolo Willox;Sherilee L. Harper;James D. Ford;Karen Landman

  • The Resilience of Indigenous Peoples to Environmental Change

    James D. Ford;Nia King;Eranga K. Galappaththi;Tristan Pearce

  • Vulnerability of Inuit food systems to food insecurity as a consequence of climate change: a case study from Igloolik, Nunavut

    James D. Ford

  • Indigenous Health and Climate Change

    James D. Ford

  • Inuit Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK), Subsistence Hunting and Adaptation to Climate Change in the Canadian Arctic

    Tristan Pearce;James Ford;Ashlee Cunsolo Willox;Barry Smit

  • Climate change and mental health: an exploratory case study from Rigolet, Nunatsiavut, Canada

    Ashlee Cunsolo Willox;Sherilee L. Harper;James D. Ford;Victoria L. Edge

  • Climate change policy responses for Canada's Inuit population: The importance of and opportunities for adaptation

    James D. Ford;Tristan Pearce;Frank Duerden;Chris Furgal

  • Climate change in the Arctic: current and future vulnerability in two Inuit communities in Canada

    James D Ford;Barry Smit;Johanna Wandel;Mishak Allurut

Frequent Co-Authors

Lea Berrang-Ford
Lea Berrang-Ford University of Leeds
Barry Smit
Barry Smit University of Guelph
Mark New
Mark New University of Cape Town
Jody Heymann
Jody Heymann University of California, Los Angeles
Linda Steg
Linda Steg University of Groningen
Scott A. McEwen
Scott A. McEwen University of Guelph
Marcos Silveira Buckeridge
Marcos Silveira Buckeridge Universidade de São Paulo
Saleemul Huq
Saleemul Huq Independent University
Jan M. Sargeant
Jan M. Sargeant University of Guelph
David L. Pearl
David L. Pearl University of Guelph

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution offers a wide range of career options, and many students find that interdisciplinary skills can enhance their job prospects. Today, online learning provides flexible and affordable pathways to complement your scientific background or help you pivot into new fields.

If you’re interested in education and information management, an affordable library science degree online can lead to roles in information science, museums, or ecological data curation. For those drawn to healthcare, there are accelerated healthcare programs to consider.

Clinical communication careers may appeal to biology graduates. You can explore asha accredited online slp master's programs or pursue slp bridge programs if your undergraduate degree isn’t in speech-language pathology. Similarly, those interested in direct patient care can transition with online accelerated bsn programs for non nurses.

Each of these online pathways offers ecological and evolutionary science graduates a unique way to leverage their expertise and pursue meaningful, in-demand careers.

Best Scientists Citing James D. Ford

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles