World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
36
Citations
5051
World Ranking
11316
National Ranking
26

Markus Grassl publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Markus Grassl sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 108 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Markus Grassl D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Markus Grassl sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Markus Grassl is affiliated with the University of Gdańsk in Poland and focuses primarily on research within the field of Computer Science. Their work spans several subfields, including Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Atomic and Molecular Physics and Optics, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, and Mathematical Physics.

Their main research interests center on topics related to Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture, Quantum Information and Cryptography, Quantum-Dot Cellular Automata, Coding Theory and Cryptography, Finite Group Theory Research, Quantum Mechanics and Applications, and Advanced Algebra and Geometry.

Markus Grassl has published extensively, with recent papers including:

  • Entropic Proofs of Singleton Bounds for Quantum Error-Correcting Codes, 2022, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
  • Entanglement-assisted quantum communication beating the quantum Singleton bound, 2021, Physical review. A/Physical review, A
  • Isoentangled Mutually Unbiased Bases, Symmetric Quantum Measurements, and Mixed-State Designs, 2020, Physical Review Letters
  • Constructing quantum error-correcting codes that require a variable amount of entanglement, 2023, Quantum Information Processing
  • Quantum variational learning for quantum error-correcting codes, 2022, Quantum

Frequent co-authors working with Markus Grassl include:

  • Martianus Frederic Ezerman
  • San Ling
  • Ingemar Bengtsson
  • Gary McConnell
  • Ferruh Özbudak

The scientist has published in multiple venues, demonstrating a consistent presence particularly in:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Quantum Information Processing
  • IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
  • Physical review. A/Physical review, A
  • Journal of Mathematical Physics

Best Publications

  • Quantum information processing and communication: strategic report on current status, visions and goals for research in Europe

    Peter Zoller;Peter Zoller;Thomas Beth;D. Binosi;D. Binosi;Rainer Blatt;Rainer Blatt

  • Codes for the quantum erasure channel

    Markus Grassl;Thomas Beth;Thomas Pellizzari

  • Symmetric informationally complete positive-operator-valued measures: A new computer study

    Andrew James Scott;M. Grassl

  • Applying Grover's Algorithm to AES: Quantum Resource Estimates

    Markus Grassl;Brandon Langenberg;Martin Roetteler;Rainer Steinwandt

  • On optimal quantum codes

    Markus Grassl;Thomas Beth;Martin Rötteler

  • On SIC-POVMs and MUBs in Dimension 6

    Markus Grassl

  • EFFICIENT QUANTUM CIRCUITS FOR NON-QUBIT QUANTUM ERROR-CORRECTING CODES

    Markus Grassl;Markus Grassl;Martin Rötteler;Martin Rötteler;Thomas Beth

  • On optimal quantum codes

    Markus Grassl;Thomas Beth;Martin Roetteler

  • Grover’s quantum search algorithm for an arbitrary initial amplitude distribution

    Eli Biham;Ofer Biham;David Biron;Markus Grassl

  • Quantum Reed-Solomon Codes

    Markus Grassl;Willi Geiselmann;Thomas Beth

  • Quantum BCH Codes

    Markus Grassl;Thomas Beth

  • Graphs, quadratic forms, and quantum codes

    M. Grassl;A. Klappenecker;M. Rotteler

  • Generalized grover search algorithm for arbitrary initial amplitude distribution

    D. Biron;O. Biham;E. Biham;M. Grassl

  • Convolutional and Tail-Biting Quantum Error-Correcting Codes

    G.D. Forney;M. Grassl;S. Guha

  • Analysis of generalized Grover quantum search algorithms using recursion equations

    Eli Biham;Ofer Biham;David Biron;Markus Grassl

  • Generalized Grover Search Algorithm for Arbitrary Initial Amplitude Distribution

    David Biron;Ofer Biham;Eli Biham;Markus Grassl

  • Convolutional and tail-biting quantum error-correcting codes

    G. David Forney;Markus Grassl;Saikat Guha

  • Tomography of Quantum States in Small Dimensions

    Markus Grassl

  • Quantum technology: from research to application

    Wolfgang P. Schleich;Kedar S. Ranade;Christian Anton;Markus Arndt

  • Quantum MDS codes over small fields

    Markus Grassl;Martin Rotteler

  • Searching for linear codes with large minimum distance

    Markus Grassl

  • On quantum MDS codes

    M. Rotteler;M. Grassl;T. Beth

  • Entropic proofs of Singleton bounds for quantum error-correcting codes.

    Markus Grassl;Felix Huber;Andreas J. Winter

  • The Clifford group fails gracefully to be a unitary 4-design

    Huangjun Zhu;Richard Kueng;Markus Grassl;David Gross

Frequent Co-Authors

Gerd Leuchs
Gerd Leuchs Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light
Thomas Beth
Thomas Beth Karlsruhe University of Applied Sciences
John A. Smolin
John A. Smolin IBM (United States)
Eli Biham
Eli Biham Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Daniel A. Lidar
Daniel A. Lidar University of Southern California
Graeme Smith
Graeme Smith University of Colorado Boulder
Časlav Brukner
Časlav Brukner Austrian Academy of Sciences
Peter Zoller
Peter Zoller University of Innsbruck
Saikat Guha
Saikat Guha University of Arizona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education can open up new career opportunities for students of computer science. For example, those interested in expanding their technical expertise may benefit from taking online electrical engineering courses USA. These programs can help broaden your skills and improve your employability in high-demand tech fields.

If you are looking for a more direct route into the workforce, consider enrolling in short certificate programs that pay well. These certifications are designed to quickly equip you with the practical skills employers need and can be a fast track to lucrative job roles.

Graduates who want to advance their education rapidly might consider the quickest masters degree online options. These accelerated programs allow you to gain advanced credentials while balancing other commitments.

When planning your career, it’s also wise to explore the most useful masters degrees. Selecting the right degree can significantly increase your earning potential and long-term job security in the technology sector.

Best Scientists Citing Markus Grassl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles