World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
46
Citations
7019
World Ranking
1388
National Ranking
6

Computer Science

D-Index
51
Citations
9194
World Ranking
5392
National Ranking
75

San Ling publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where San Ling sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 241 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

San Ling D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where San Ling sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

San Ling is affiliated with Nanyang Technological University in Singapore and has contributed extensively to the field of computer science. Their research spans numerous aspects of coding theory, cryptography, and quantum computing, with a substantial number of publications focusing on these core areas.

Their main field of study is Computer Science, with a concentration in several subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

San Ling's research topics cover a broad range, notably:

  • Coding theory and cryptography
  • Graph theory and CDMA systems
  • Cryptography and data security
  • Quantum computing algorithms and architecture
  • Cooperative communication and network coding
  • Quantum-Dot Cellular Automata
  • Advanced data storage technologies

Frequent publication venues where San Ling has contributed include:

  • IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Quantum Information Processing
  • Journal of Cryptology
  • Designs Codes and Cryptography

The scientist has collaborated repeatedly with a number of coauthors, among them:

  • Martianus Frederic Ezerman
  • Gaojun Luo
  • Huaxiong Wang
  • Xiwang Cao
  • Khoa Nguyen

Among San Ling's recent papers are:

  • Provably Secure Group Signature Schemes From Code-Based Assumptions, 2020, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
  • Three New Constructions of Optimal Locally Repairable Codes From Matrix-Product Codes, 2022, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
  • Constructing quantum error-correcting codes that require a variable amount of entanglement, 2023, Quantum Information Processing
  • Zero-Knowledge Arguments for Lattice-Based Accumulators: Logarithmic-Size Ring Signatures and Group Signatures Without Trapdoors, 2023, Journal of Cryptology
  • Application of optimal p-ary linear codes to alphabet-optimal locally repairable codes, 2022, Designs Codes and Cryptography

Best Publications

  • The Biomolecular Interaction Network Database and related tools 2005 update

    C. Alfarano;C. E. Andrade;K. Anthony;N. Bahroos

  • Pushing the limits: a very compact and a threshold implementation of AES

    Amir Moradi;Axel Poschmann;San Ling;Christof Paar

  • Coding Theory: A First Course

    Chaoping Xing;San Ling

  • On the algebraic structure of quasi-cyclic codes .I. Finite fields

    San Ling;P. Sole

  • Side-Channel Resistant Crypto for Less than 2,300 GE

    Axel Poschmann;Amir Moradi;Khoongming Khoo;Chu-Wee Lim

  • Zero-Knowledge Arguments for Lattice-Based Accumulators: Logarithmic-Size Ring Signatures and Group Signatures Without Trapdoors

    Benoît Libert;San Ling;Khoa Nguyen;Huaxiong Wang

  • Coding Theory: Index

    Unknown

  • Application of Constacyclic Codes to Quantum MDS Codes

    Bocong Chen;San Ling;Guanghui Zhang

  • Improved Zero-Knowledge Proofs of Knowledge for the ISIS Problem, and Applications

    San Ling;Khoa Nguyen;Damien Stehlé;Huaxiong Wang

  • Lattice-Based Group Signature Scheme with Verifier-Local Revocation

    Adeline Langlois;San Ling;Khoa Nguyen;Huaxiong Wang

  • Application of Classical Hermitian Self-Orthogonal MDS Codes to Quantum MDS Codes

    Lingfei Jin;San Ling;Jinquan Luo;Chaoping Xing

  • Signature Schemes with Efficient Protocols and Dynamic Group Signatures from Lattice Assumptions

    Benoît Libert;San Ling;Fabrice Mouhartem;Khoa Nguyen

  • Advanced Meet-in-the-Middle Preimage Attacks: First Results on Full Tiger, and Improved Results on MD4 and SHA-2

    Jian Guo;San Ling;Christian Rechberger;Huaxiong Wang

  • On Self-Dual Cyclic Codes Over Finite Fields

    Yan Jia;San Ling;Chaoping Xing

  • Group signatures from lattices : simpler, tighter, shorter, ring-based

    San Ling;Khoa Nguyen;Huaxiong Wang

  • SKEW CONSTACYCLIC CODES OVER FINITE CHAIN RINGS

    Somphong Jitman;San Ling;Patanee Udomkavanich

  • On the Algebraic Structure of Quasi-cyclic Codes II: Chain Rings

    San Ling;Patrick Solé

  • Revocable identity-based encryption from lattices

    Jie Chen;Hoon Wei Lim;San Ling;Huaxiong Wang

  • Cyclic Codes Over$$\mathbb{Z}_{4}$$ of Even Length

    Steven T. Dougherty;San Ling

  • On the algebraic structure of quasi-cyclic codes III: generator theory

    San Ling;P. Sole

  • 256 bit standardized crypto for 650 GE: GOST revisited

    Axel Poschmann;San Ling;Huaxiong Wang

  • A lattice-based group signature scheme with verifier-local revocation

    San Ling;Khoa Nguyen;Adeline Roux-Langlois;Huaxiong Wang

Frequent Co-Authors

Huaxiong Wang
Huaxiong Wang Nanyang Technological University
Chaoping Xing
Chaoping Xing Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Patrick Solé
Patrick Solé Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Josef Pieprzyk
Josef Pieprzyk Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Benoît Libert
Benoît Libert École Normale Supérieure de Lyon
Ron Steinfeld
Ron Steinfeld Monash University
Christian Rechberger
Christian Rechberger Graz University of Technology
Damien Stehlé
Damien Stehlé École Normale Supérieure de Lyon
Cunsheng Ding
Cunsheng Ding Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Hoeteck Wee
Hoeteck Wee École Normale Supérieure

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying mathematics in the USA opens doors to a wide range of career pathways and opportunities for further education. Many students interested in combining strong quantitative skills with business acumen choose to pursue an one year MBA programs, which offer accelerated paths to management roles.

For those who already have some graduate coursework, exploring online MBA programs that accept transfer credits can be ideal. This flexibility helps professionals balance continuing education with their careers.

Mathematics graduates keen on data-driven decision-making often consider the best masters in data analytics programs. These programs equip students with essential skills to analyze complex data sets and play key roles in industries like finance, healthcare, and technology.

If you’re beginning your education journey and wondering what MBA programs can I get into, exploring programs with varying admission criteria can help you find a good fit and start progressing toward advanced career goals.

Best Scientists Citing San Ling

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles