World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
France
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
48
Citations
9997
World Ranking
6151
National Ranking
128

Benoît Libert publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benoît Libert sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 129 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Benoît Libert D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benoît Libert sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in France Leader Award

Overview

Benoît Libert is affiliated with the École Normale Supérieure de Lyon in France. The main field of their research is Computer Science, with a focus on several subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems, and General Health Professions.

Their work covers a variety of topics, notably:

  • Cryptography and Data Security
  • Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
  • Cryptographic Implementations and Security
  • Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
  • Coding theory and cryptography
  • Blockchain Technology Applications and Security

Benoît Libert has contributed to multiple research papers, including the following recent publications:

  • Zero-Knowledge Arguments for Lattice-Based Accumulators: Logarithmic-Size Ring Signatures and Group Signatures Without Trapdoors, 2023, Journal of Cryptology
  • Updatable Public Key Encryption from DCR, 2022, Proceedings of the 2022 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security
  • SO-CCA secure PKE from pairing based all-but-many lossy trapdoor functions, 2021, Designs Codes and Cryptography
  • Adaptive oblivious transfer with access control from lattice assumptions, 2021, Theoretical Computer Science
  • Adaptively Secure Distributed PRFs from LWE, 2021, Journal of Cryptology

Frequent coauthors in their publications include:

  • Khoa Nguyen
  • Thomas Peters
  • Alain Passelègue
  • Moti Yung
  • Radu Ţiţiu

Benoît Libert regularly publishes in academic venues such as:

  • Journal of Cryptology
  • Proceedings of the 2022 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security
  • Designs Codes and Cryptography
  • Theoretical Computer Science

In addition to journal articles and conference proceedings, Benoît Libert has contributed to book publications, including work published by Springer Science+Business Media. One notable book is "Public-Key Cryptography - PKC 2022" released in 2022.

Best Publications

  • Efficient and provably-secure identity-based signatures and signcryption from bilinear maps

    Paulo S. L. M. Barreto;Benoît Libert;Noel McCullagh;Jean-Jacques Quisquater

  • Efficient and provably-secure identity-based signatures and signcryption from bilinear maps

    Pslm Barreto;Jean-Jacques Quisquater;Benoît Libert;N McCullagh

  • Unidirectional Chosen-Ciphertext Secure Proxy Re-Encryption

    Benoît Libert;D Vergnaud

  • Expressive key-policy attribute-based encryption with constant-size ciphertexts

    Nuttapong Attrapadung;Benoît Libert;Elie De Panafieu

  • A new identity based signcryption scheme from pairings

    B. Libert;J.J. Quisquater

  • Fully Secure Functional Encryption for Inner Products, from Standard Assumptions

    Shweta Agrawal;Benoît Libert;Damien Stehlé

  • Anonymous broadcast encryption: adaptive security and efficient constructions in the standard model

    Benoît Libert;Kenneth G. Paterson;Elizabeth A. Quaglia

  • Attribute-based encryption schemes with constant-size ciphertexts

    Nuttapong Attrapadung;Javier Herranz;Fabien Laguillaumie;Benoît Libert

  • Zero-Knowledge Arguments for Lattice-Based Accumulators: Logarithmic-Size Ring Signatures and Group Signatures Without Trapdoors

    Benoît Libert;San Ling;Khoa Nguyen;Huaxiong Wang

  • Adaptive-ID Secure Revocable Identity-Based Encryption

    Benoît Libert;Damien Vergnaud

  • New identity based signcryption schemes from pairings.

    Benoît Libert;Jean-Jacques Quisquater

  • Efficient signcryption with key privacy from gap Diffie-Hellman groups

    Benoît Libert;Jean-Jacques Quisquater

  • On constructing certificateless cryptosystems from identity based encryption

    Benoît Libert;Jean-Jacques Quisquater

  • Functional encryption for inner product: achieving constant-size ciphertexts with adaptive security or support for negation

    Nuttapong Attrapadung;Benoît Libert

  • Lattice-Based Group Signatures with Logarithmic Signature Size

    Fabien Laguillaumie;Fabien Laguillaumie;Adeline Langlois;Benoît Libert;Damien Stehlé

  • Efficient revocation and threshold pairing based cryptosystems

    Benoît Libert;Jean-Jacques Quisquater

  • Short attribute-based signatures for threshold predicates

    Javier Herranz;Fabien Laguillaumie;Benoît Libert;Carla Ràfols

  • Signature Schemes with Efficient Protocols and Dynamic Group Signatures from Lattice Assumptions

    Benoît Libert;San Ling;Fabrice Mouhartem;Khoa Nguyen

  • A Scalable Scheme for Privacy-Preserving Aggregation of Time-Series Data

    Marc Joye;Benoît Libert

  • Group Signatures with Almost-for-Free Revocation

    Benoît Libert;Thomas Peters;Moti Yung

  • Multi-use unidirectional proxy re-signatures

    Benoît Libert;Damien Vergnaud

Frequent Co-Authors

Moti Yung
Moti Yung Columbia University
Jean-Jacques Quisquater
Jean-Jacques Quisquater Université Catholique de Louvain
Damien Vergnaud
Damien Vergnaud Institut Universitaire de France
Huaxiong Wang
Huaxiong Wang Nanyang Technological University
San Ling
San Ling Nanyang Technological University
Damien Stehlé
Damien Stehlé École Normale Supérieure de Lyon
Hoeteck Wee
Hoeteck Wee École Normale Supérieure
Marc Fischlin
Marc Fischlin Technical University of Darmstadt

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Computer Science in the USA opens the door to many related academic and career options. Many students expand their knowledge and marketability by considering affordable master degree programs in fields that complement tech, such as business, information management, or leadership.

For those interested in the interplay between technology and business strategy, completing an executive mba online provides advanced management training with the flexibility of remote study. Exploring the digital information landscape, some transition to an mlis degree (Master of Library and Information Science), where tech skills are essential for digital archiving and data curation roles.

If you’re seeking leadership roles beyond entry-level jobs, you might consider the wide range of affordable master degree programs available online. Ambitious professionals looking to lead organizations or conduct in-depth research may pursue a phd in leadership online, which focuses on strategic decision-making and organizational development.

As technology continues to shape all industries, combining computer science skills with other disciplines through online degrees can significantly broaden your career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Benoît Libert

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles