World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
51
Citations
7906
World Ranking
5431
National Ranking
110

Hoeteck Wee publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hoeteck Wee sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 127 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Hoeteck Wee D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hoeteck Wee sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Hoeteck Wee is affiliated with the École Normale Supérieure in France. Their research primarily spans the field of Computer Science, with significant contributions to several subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Information Systems, Computer Networks and Communications, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

The scientist's work is predominantly centered on topics such as Cryptography and Data Security, Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs, Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data, Cryptographic Implementations and Security, Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting, Security in Wireless Sensor Networks, and Coding Theory and Cryptography.

Hoeteck Wee has published extensively in various distinguished venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Lecture notes in computer science
  • Proceedings of the 2022 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security
  • Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • Theory of Computing

Among recent notable papers are:

  • FABEO, 2022, Proceedings of the 2022 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security
  • Inaccessible Entropy I: Inaccessible Entropy Generators and Statistically Hiding Commitments from One-Way Functions, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • One-One Constrained Pseudorandom Functions, 2020, Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • Information-Theoretic 2-Round MPC Without Round Collapsing: Adaptive Security, and More, 2020, Lecture notes in computer science
  • Unnamed paper, 2020, Theory of Computing

The scientist often collaborates with other researchers. Frequent co-authors include:

  • David J. Wu
  • Daniel Wichs
  • Valerio Cini
  • Iftach Haitner
  • Omer Reingold

Best Publications

  • Attribute-based encryption for circuits

    Sergey Gorbunov;Vinod Vaikuntanathan;Hoeteck Wee

  • Toward privacy in public databases

    Shuchi Chawla;Cynthia Dwork;Frank McSherry;Adam Smith

  • On Obfuscating Point Functions.

    Hoeteck Wee

  • Functional Encryption with Bounded Collusions via Multi-party Computation

    Sergey Gorbunov;Vinod Vaikuntanathan;Hoeteck Wee

  • Fully, (Almost) Tightly Secure IBE and Dual System Groups

    Jie Chen;Hoeteck Wee

  • On the Security of the TLS Protocol: A Systematic Analysis

    Hugo Krawczyk;Kenneth G. Paterson;Hoeteck Wee

  • Predicate Encryption for Circuits from LWE

    Sergey Gorbunov;Vinod Vaikuntanathan;Hoeteck Wee

  • Improved Dual System ABE in Prime-Order Groups via Predicate Encodings

    Jie Chen;Hoeteck Wee

  • Selfish caching in distributed systems: a game-theoretic analysis

    Byung-Gon Chun;Kamalika Chaudhuri;Hoeteck Wee;Marco Barreno

  • Functional Encryption: New Perspectives and Lower Bounds

    Shweta Agrawal;Sergey Gorbunov;Vinod Vaikuntanathan;Hoeteck Wee

  • Dual System Encryption via Predicate Encodings.

    Hoeteck Wee

  • Functional encryption for threshold functions (or fuzzy IBE) from lattices

    Shweta Agrawal;Xavier Boyen;Vinod Vaikuntanathan;Panagiotis Voulgaris

  • Multi-input Inner-Product Functional Encryption from Pairings

    Michel Abdalla;Mariana Raykova;Hoeteck Wee

  • Pebbling and proofs of work

    Cynthia Dwork;Moni Naor;Hoeteck Wee

  • Quasi-Adaptive NIZK for Linear Subspaces Revisited.

    Eike Kiltz;Hoeteck Wee

  • Black-Box, Round-Efficient Secure Computation via Non-malleability Amplification

    Hoeteck Wee

  • The OPTLS Protocol and TLS 1.3

    Hugo Krawczyk;Hoeteck Wee

  • Black-Box Constructions of Two-Party Protocols from One-Way Functions

    Rafael Pass;Hoeteck Wee

  • Partial Garbling Schemes and Their Applications

    Yuval Ishai;Hoeteck Wee

  • Public key encryption against related key attacks

    Hoeteck Wee

  • Tightly CCA-Secure Encryption Without Pairings

    Dennis Hofheinz;Eike Kiltz;Hoeteck Wee

Frequent Co-Authors

Tal Malkin
Tal Malkin Columbia University
Salil P. Vadhan
Salil P. Vadhan Harvard University
Daniel Wichs
Daniel Wichs Northeastern University
Omer Reingold
Omer Reingold Stanford University
Eike Kiltz
Eike Kiltz Ruhr University Bochum
Michel Abdalla
Michel Abdalla École Normale Supérieure
Benoît Libert
Benoît Libert École Normale Supérieure de Lyon

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can help you tailor your Computer Science journey to fit your timeline and career goals. For those seeking a rapid path to advancement, consider one of the shortest masters degree programs, which may allow you to complete your studies in as little as one year.

Looking for the best return on your investment? Some of the most useful graduate degrees are in high demand fields like data science, cybersecurity, and artificial intelligence. These specializations can open doors to lucrative roles across the tech industry.

If you’re just starting out, an online associate's degree in Computer Science can be a flexible and affordable way to build foundational skills. Many students use this credential as a stepping stone to a bachelor’s degree or to enter tech support and junior developer positions.

Affordability is a key concern for many learners. Fortunately, there are affordable online degree programs available that combine quality instruction with lower tuition, helping you minimize debt while maximizing future opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Hoeteck Wee

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles