World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
35
Citations
5358
World Ranking
11684
National Ranking
4789

Abhishek Jain publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Abhishek Jain sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 130 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Abhishek Jain D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Abhishek Jain sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Abhishek Jain is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University in the United States. Their primary research field is Computer Science, with extensive work particularly in Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Information Systems, Computer Networks and Communications, and Clinical Psychology.

Their research covers several main topics including Cryptography and Data Security, Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs, Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data, Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting, Cryptographic Implementations and Security, Blockchain Technology Applications and Security, and Security and Verification in Computing.

Recent publications by Abhishek Jain include:

  • Indistinguishability Obfuscation via Mathematical Proofs of Equivalence, 2022, 2022 IEEE 63rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS)
  • Trust based Intrusion Detection System Architecture for WSN, 2020, International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE)

Frequent coauthors in their collaborative work include:

  • Zhengzhong Jin
  • Arka Rai Choudhuri
  • Sanjam Garg
  • Aarushi Goel
  • Giulio Malavolta

The scientist has published multiple papers in several venues, with frequent appearances in:

  • Lecture Notes in Computer Science
  • Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies
  • 2022 IEEE 63rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS)
  • Proceedings of the 2022 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security
  • FOCUS The Journal of Lifelong Learning in Psychiatry

Best Publications

  • Bounded Ciphertext Policy Attribute Based Encryption

    Vipul Goyal;Abhishek Jain;Omkant Pandey;Amit Sahai

  • Multiparty computation with low communication, computation and interaction via threshold FHE

    Gilad Asharov;Abhishek Jain;Adriana López-Alt;Eran Tromer

  • Multi-input Functional Encryption

    Shafi Goldwasser;S. Dov Gordon;Vipul Goyal;Abhishek Jain

  • Indistinguishability Obfuscation from Compact Functional Encryption

    Prabhanjan Ananth;Abhishek Jain

  • IoT and Machine Learning Approaches for Automation of Farm Irrigation System

    Anneketh Vij;Singh Vijendra;Abhishek Jain;Shivam Bajaj

  • Function-Hiding Inner Product Encryption

    Allison Bishop;Abhishek Jain;Lucas Kowalczyk

  • Time-Lock Puzzles from Randomized Encodings

    Nir Bitansky;Shafi Goldwasser;Abhishek Jain;Omer Paneth

  • Practical UC security with a Global Random Oracle.

    Ran Canetti;Abhishek Jain;Alessandra Scafuro

  • Commitments and Efficient Zero-Knowledge Proofs from Learning Parity with Noise

    Abhishek Jain;Stephan Krenn;Krzysztof Pietrzak;Aris Tentes

  • Efficient Authentication from Hard Learning Problems

    Eike Kiltz;Krzysztof Pietrzak;Daniele Venturi;David Cash

  • Fairness in an Unfair World: Fair Multiparty Computation from Public Bulletin Boards

    Arka Rai Choudhuri;Matthew Green;Abhishek Jain;Gabriel Kaptchuk

  • On the Achievability of Simulation-Based Security for Functional Encryption.

    Angelo De Caro;Vincenzo Iovino;Abhishek Jain;Adam O'Neill

  • Efficient authentication from hard learning problems

    Eike Kiltz;Krzysztof Pietrzak;David Cash;Abhishek Jain

  • Leakage-resilient zero knowledge

    Sanjam Garg;Abhishek Jain;Amit Sahai

  • Succinct Garbling and Indistinguishability Obfuscation for RAM Programs

    Ran Canetti;Justin Holmgren;Abhishek Jain;Vinod Vaikuntanathan

  • Packet-dropping adversary identification for data plane security

    Xin Zhang;Abhishek Jain;Adrian Perrig

  • Why “fiat-shamir for proofs” lacks a proof

    Nir Bitansky;Dana Dachman-Soled;Sanjam Garg;Abhishek Jain

  • Distinguisher-Dependent Simulation in Two Rounds and its Applications

    Abhishek Jain;Yael Tauman Kalai;Dakshita Khurana;Ron Rothblum

  • Functional Encryption for Randomized Functionalities

    Vipul Goyal;Abhishek Jain;Venkata Koppula;Amit Sahai

  • Multiparty computation secure against continual memory leakage

    Elette Boyle;Shafi Goldwasser;Abhishek Jain;Yael Tauman Kalai

  • Multi-Input Functional Encryption.

    Shafi Goldwasser;Vipul Goyal;Abhishek Jain;Amit Sahai

  • Multiparty Computation with Low Communication, Computation and Interaction via Threshold FHE.

    Gilad Asharov;Abhishek Jain;Daniel Wichs

Frequent Co-Authors

Vipul Goyal
Vipul Goyal Carnegie Mellon University
Amit Sahai
Amit Sahai University of California, Los Angeles
Rafail Ostrovsky
Rafail Ostrovsky University of California, Los Angeles
Ran Canetti
Ran Canetti Boston University
Krzysztof Pietrzak
Krzysztof Pietrzak Institute of Science and Technology Austria
Sanjam Garg
Sanjam Garg University of California, Berkeley
Daniel Wichs
Daniel Wichs Northeastern University
Manoj Prabhakaran
Manoj Prabhakaran Indian Institute of Technology Bombay

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online study options in the USA opens up a diverse array of degree pathways that complement Computer Science and broaden career prospects. Many students are now considering a 2-year computer science degree online for a faster, flexible route into tech roles, software development, or data analysis.

For those interested in applying technology to solve environmental issues, pursuing environmental engineering degrees online can be a smart pathway. This specialization integrates core computing with sustainability and green innovation.

Students focused on building, designing, or maintaining systems may look into the cheapest mechanical engineering degree online. This route offers a budget-friendly option for those seeking hands-on engineering skills alongside digital learning.

If your interests lie in the fundamental sciences, an online bachelor's degree in physics provides strong analytical and problem-solving foundations—skills highly valued in many tech and research roles.

Whichever path you choose, these online degrees expand your knowledge base and open doors to interdisciplinary careers at the intersection of technology and science.

Best Scientists Citing Abhishek Jain

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles