World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Stephanie L. Sherman

Stephanie L. Sherman

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 84 15101 14212 7627 7059 317 25748
Genetics 83 1415 1342 667 627 325 25317

Stephanie L. Sherman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Stephanie L. Sherman between 1982 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Stephanie L. Sherman published across 44 years, from 1982 to 2025, averaging 8.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 40 publications in 1991. 4 of the 367 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 40. Peak 40 publications in 1991. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 19 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 13 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 40 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 10 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 12 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 13 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 3 publications
1982 2025

367 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Stephanie L. Sherman: publications per year, 1982 to 2025
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 0
1984 3
1985 19
1986 4
1987 3
1988 5
1989 13
1990 2
1991 40
1992 7
1993 8
1994 8
1995 7
1996 10
1997 7
1998 12
1999 3
2000 13
2001 3
2002 4
2003 5
2004 8
2005 8
2006 2
2007 8
2008 16
2009 10
2010 8
2011 10
2012 14
2013 7
2014 10
2015 3
2016 12
2017 9
2018 6
2019 9
2020 13
2021 18
2022 12
2023 3
2024 1
2025 3
Total 367
Download as CSV

Stephanie L. Sherman publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephanie L. Sherman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 325–334 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 325 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60 325
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Stephanie L. Sherman D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephanie L. Sherman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 82–83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110 83
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Stephanie L. Sherman is affiliated with Emory University in the United States and has a research focus primarily in the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Their work encompasses various subfields including Genetics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, and Epidemiology.

The main areas of research for Sherman involve Down syndrome and intellectual disability, Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Autism Spectrum Disorder, congenital heart defects, chronic disease management strategies, family and disability support, and genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities.

Significant recent publications include:

  • Down syndrome, 2020, Nature Reviews Disease Primers
  • Medical vulnerability of individuals with Down syndrome to severe COVID-19-data from the Trisomy 21 Research Society and the UK ISARIC4C survey, 2021, EClinicalMedicine
  • Opportunities, barriers, and recommendations in Down syndrome research, 2021, Translational Science of Rare Diseases
  • Expressive language sampling as a source of outcome measures for treatment studies in fragile X syndrome: feasibility, practice effects, test-retest reliability, and construct validity, 2020, Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Refining the risk for fragile X-associated primary ovarian insufficiency (FXPOI) by FMR1 CGG repeat size, 2021, Genetics in Medicine

Sherman frequently publishes in venues such as the Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Scientific Reports, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), SSRN Electronic Journal, and Genetics in Medicine.

The scientist collaborates regularly with several coauthors, including André Strydom, Mara Dierssen, Anke Hüls, Tracie C. Rosser, and Alberto C. S. Costa.

Best Publications

  • FMR1 and the fragile X syndrome: Human genome epidemiology review

    Dana C Crawford;Juan M Acuña;Juan M Acuña;Stephanie L Sherman

  • Further segregation analysis of the fragile X syndrome with special reference to transmitting males

    S. L. Sherman;P. A. Jacobs;N. E. Morton;U. Froster-Iskenius

  • Association and Linkage of the Dopamine Transporter Gene and Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Children: Heterogeneity owing to Diagnostic Subtype and Severity

    I.D. Waldman;D.C. Rowe;A. Abramowitz;S.T. Kozel

  • Epidemiology of Down syndrome

    Stephanie L. Sherman;Emily G. Allen;Lora H. Bean;Sallie B. Freeman

  • Premature ovarian failure in the fragile X syndrome.

    Stephanie L. Sherman

  • Population-based study of congenital heart defects in Down syndrome.

    Sallie B. Freeman;Lisa F. Taft;Kenneth J. Dooley;Katherine Allran

  • Polymorphisms in genes involved in folate metabolism as maternal risk factors for Down syndrome.

    Charlotte A. Hobbs;Stephanie L. Sherman;Ping Yi;Sarah E. Hopkins

  • Association of FMR1 repeat size with ovarian dysfunction

    A.K. Sullivan;M. Marcus;M.P. Epstein;E.G. Allen

  • Incidence of fragile X syndrome by newborn screening for methylated FMR1 DNA.

    Bradford Coffee;Krayton Keith;Igor Albizua;Tamika Malone

  • The FMR1 premutation and reproduction.

    Michael D. Wittenberger;Randi J. Hagerman;Stephanie L. Sherman;Allyn McConkie-Rosell

  • The marker (X) syndrome: a cytogenetic and genetic analysis

    S. L. Sherman;N. E. Morton;P. A. Jacobs;G. Turner

  • Susceptible chiasmate configurations of chromosome 21 predispose to non-disjunction in both maternal meiosis I and meiosis II

    Neil E. Lamb;Sallie B. Freeman;Amanda Savage-Austin;Dorothy Pettay

  • Expansion of the Fragile X CGG Repeat in Females with Premutation or Intermediate Alleles

    Sarah L. Nolin;W. Ted Brown;Anne Glicksman;George E. Houck

  • Fragile X syndrome: Diagnostic and carrier testing

    Stephanie Sherman;Beth A. Pletcher;Deborah A. Driscoll

  • Ethnicity, sex, and the incidence of congenital heart defects: a report from the National Down Syndrome Project.

    Sallie B Freeman;Lora H Bean;Emily G Allen;Stuart W Tinker

  • Dopamine DRD4 receptor polymorphism and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

    D C Rowe;C Stever;L N Giedinghagen;J M C Gard

  • Recombination and nondisjunction in humans and flies

    Kara E. Koehler;R. Scott Hawley;Stephanie Sherman;Stephanie Sherman;Terry Hassold

  • Recombination and maternal age-dependent nondisjunction : molecular studies of trisomy 16

    T Hassold;M Merrill;K Adkins;S Freeman

  • Characterization of Susceptible Chiasma Configurations that Increase the Risk for Maternal Nondisjunction of Chromosome 21

    Neil E. Lamb;Eleanor Feingold;Amanda Savage;Dimitris Avramopoulos

  • Examination of reproductive aging milestones among women who carry the FMR1 premutation

    E.G. Allen;A.K. Sullivan;M. Marcus;C. Small

Frequent Co-Authors

Eleanor Feingold
Eleanor Feingold University of Pittsburgh
Terry J. Hassold
Terry J. Hassold Washington State University
Newton E. Morton
Newton E. Morton University of Southampton
Jurg Ott
Jurg Ott Rockefeller University
Peter L. Pearson
Peter L. Pearson Universidade de São Paulo
Kenneth K. Kidd
Kenneth K. Kidd Yale University
David R. Cox
David R. Cox Stanford University
Hans-Hilger Ropers
Hans-Hilger Ropers Max Planck Society
Mark H. Skolnick
Mark H. Skolnick Myriad Genetics (Germany)
Ray White
Ray White University of Utah

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring genetics opens the door to diverse health science careers and online study options. Students interested in applied healthcare can consider nursing schools without teas test requirements, which remove common barriers to entry for aspiring nurses. Online programs, especially accelerated options like a 10 month lpn program, make it faster and more convenient to enter the workforce.

For those aiming for leadership roles in healthcare, a masters in healthcare administration provides foundational skills in management and policy. This pathway complements genetics expertise for those pursuing administrative, research, or consulting careers.

Advanced online degrees further expand opportunities. Pursuing a phd nursing programs can lead to specialized research or academic positions, connecting genetics with direct clinical impact. These programs are designed for flexibility, affordability, and accessibility, allowing professionals to upskill while balancing current commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Stephanie L. Sherman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles