World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 81 1410 1259 848 740 247 20477

Donald B. Bailey publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Donald B. Bailey between 1977 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Donald B. Bailey published across 49 years, from 1977 to 2025, averaging 6 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2001. 4 of the 292 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2001. 1977: 1 publication 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 1 publication 1983: 4 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 7 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 10 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 15 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 3 publications
1977 2025

292 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Donald B. Bailey: publications per year, 1977 to 2025
Year Publications
1977 1
1978 1
1979 0
1980 0
1981 1
1982 1
1983 4
1984 5
1985 3
1986 3
1987 5
1988 7
1989 5
1990 10
1991 6
1992 6
1993 6
1994 5
1995 4
1996 3
1997 3
1998 4
1999 9
2000 6
2001 15
2002 5
2003 5
2004 5
2005 8
2006 7
2007 6
2008 12
2009 9
2010 12
2011 10
2012 9
2013 14
2014 8
2015 7
2016 10
2017 5
2018 13
2019 7
2020 8
2021 6
2022 5
2023 4
2024 1
2025 3
Total 292
Download as CSV

Donald B. Bailey publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donald B. Bailey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 241–250 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 247 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196 247
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Donald B. Bailey D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donald B. Bailey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 80–81 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120 81
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Donald B. Bailey is affiliated with the Research Triangle Park Foundation in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with significant contributions also in Medicine. These main fields encompass several specialized subfields including Genetics, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Molecular Biology, Clinical Biochemistry, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

The scientist's work covers a wide range of research topics. Key areas addressed include:

  • Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
  • Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
  • Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • RNA modifications and cancer
  • Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research

Donald B. Bailey has authored multiple papers published in various academic venues. Some recent notable publications include:

  • "Genomic Sequencing for Newborn Screening: Results of the NC NEXUS Project" (2020), The American Journal of Human Genetics
  • "Evaluation of X-Linked Adrenoleukodystrophy Newborn Screening in North Carolina" (2020), JAMA Network Open
  • "Developmental Outcomes Among Young Children With Congenital Zika Syndrome in Brazil" (2020), JAMA Network Open
  • "Expert Evaluation of Strategies to Modernize Newborn Screening in the United States" (2021), JAMA Network Open
  • "Emergence of Developmental Delay in Infants and Toddlers With an FMR1 Mutation" (2021), PEDIATRICS

The scientist frequently publishes in several outlets, notably:

  • UNC Libraries
  • JAMA Network Open
  • International Journal of Neonatal Screening
  • The American Journal of Human Genetics
  • PEDIATRICS

Donald B. Bailey collaborates regularly with a number of co-authors, including:

  • Cynthia M. Powell
  • Holly L. Peay
  • Anne Wheeler
  • Melissa Raspa
  • Lisa M. Gehtland

Best Publications

  • Fragile X syndrome

    Randi J. Hagerman;Elizabeth Berry-Kravis;Heather Cody Hazlett;Donald B. Bailey

  • Effective Teaching: Principles and Procedures of Applied Behavior Analysis with Exceptional Students

    Mark Wolery;Donald B. Bailey;George M. Sugai

  • Newborn Screening: Toward a Uniform Screening Panel and System—Executive Summary

    Michael S. Watson;Marie Y. Mann;Michele A. Lloyd-Puryear;Piero Rinaldo

  • Family Outcomes in Early Intervention: A Framework for Program Evaluation and Efficacy Research:

    Donald B. Bailey;R. A. McWilliam;Lynette Aytch Darkes;Kathy Hebbeler

  • Co‐occurring conditions associated with FMR1 gene variations: Findings from a national parent survey

    Donald B. Bailey;Melissa Raspa;Murrey Olmsted;David B. Holiday

  • Models of acculturation and health behaviors among Latino immigrants to the US.

    E Arcia;M Skinner;D Bailey;V Correa

  • Autistic behavior in children with fragile X syndrome: prevalence, stability, and the impact of FMRP.

    Deborah D. Hatton;John Sideris;Martie Skinner;Jean Mankowski

  • FMR1 CGG allele size and prevalence ascertained through newborn screening in the United States

    Flora Tassone;Ka Pou Iong;Tzu-Han Tong;Joyce Lo

  • First experiences with early intervention: a national perspective.

    Donald B. Bailey;Kathleen Hebbeler;Anita Scarborough;Donna Spiker

  • Autistic Behavior in Young Boys with Fragile X Syndrome.

    Donald B. Bailey;Gary B. Mesibov;Deborah D. Hatton;Renee D. Clark

  • Recommended Outcomes for Families of Young Children with Disabilities.

    Donald B. Bailey;Mary Beth Bruder;Kathy Hebbeler;Judith Carta

  • Assessing needs of families with handicapped infants

    Donald B. Bailey;Rune J. Simeonsson

  • Autistic behavior, FMR1 protein, and developmental trajectories in young males with fragile X syndrome.

    Donald B. Bailey;Deborah D. Hatton;Martie Skinner;Gary Mesibov

  • Behavioral and Developmental Outcomes in Young Children with Disabilities in Integrated and Segregated Settings A Review of Comparative Studies

    Virginia Buysse;Donald B. Bailey

  • Early Development, Temperament, and Functional Impairment in Autism and Fragile X Syndrome

    Donald B. Bailey;Deborah D. Hatton;Gary Mesibov;Nicole Ament

  • Maternal depression and developmental disability: Research critique

    Donald B. Bailey;Robert N. Golden;Jane Roberts;Amy Ford

  • Effects of Classroom Social Structure and Disability on Engagement

    R. A. McWilliam;Donald B. Bailey

  • Mood and anxiety disorders in females with the FMR1 premutation

    Jane E. Roberts;Donald B. Bailey;Jean Mankowski;Amy Ford

  • Inclusion in the context of competing values in early childhood education

    Donald B. Bailey;R.A. McWilliam;Virginia Buysse;Patricia W. Wesley

  • Newborn Sequencing in Genomic Medicine and Public Health.

    Jonathan S. Berg;Pankaj B. Agrawal;Donald B. Bailey;Alan H. Beggs

  • Needs and supports reported by Latino families of young children with developmental disabilities

    Donald B. Bailey;Debra Skinner;Vivian Correa;Emily Arcia

Frequent Co-Authors

Melissa Raspa
Melissa Raspa RTI International
Deborah D. Hatton
Deborah D. Hatton Vanderbilt University
Jane E. Roberts
Jane E. Roberts University of South Carolina
Rune J. Simeonsson
Rune J. Simeonsson University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Debra Skinner
Debra Skinner University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
John Sideris
John Sideris University of Southern California
Megan A. Lewis
Megan A. Lewis RTI International
Virginia Buysse
Virginia Buysse University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Jonathan S. Berg
Jonathan S. Berg University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Elizabeth Berry-Kravis
Elizabeth Berry-Kravis Rush University Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Earning a degree in Psychology opens the door to a range of online degrees and career pathways beyond traditional clinical practice. One in-demand field is speech-language pathology, which blends psychology, education, and healthcare. If you're considering this route, it's important to understand state-specific certification requirements.

For example, aspiring professionals must meet Texas speech pathologist certification requirements for practice in the state. Similarly, those interested in working in Utah should learn about how to become a speech language pathologist in Utah, while licensure in Vermont mandates following Vermont slp certification requirements. In Virginia, candidates must adhere to Virginia slp certification requirements.

Many accredited universities now offer flexible online psychology and communication sciences programs. These can prepare graduates for certification exams and supervised clinical experiences. Exploring various state licensure requirements ensures you select an online program that will meet the qualifications for your chosen career and location.

Best Scientists Citing Donald B. Bailey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles