World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
67
Citations
16263
World Ranking
2600
National Ranking
1500

Mark Wolery publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Wolery sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 189 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Mark Wolery D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Wolery sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark Wolery is affiliated with Vanderbilt University in the United States. Their academic profile includes a focus on scientific research with a background associated with this institution.

Although specific details about their recent papers, co-authors, or publication venues are not available, the scientist's profile reflects engagement with scholarly activities relevant to their academic environment.

The available data does not list particular fields of study, subfields, or topics that Mark Wolery specializes in. This limits insight into the precise areas of research focus or thematic expertise.

No records indicate book publications or awards granted, which suggests that such information has not been catalogued or made publicly accessible in this context.

Mark Wolery is currently living, indicating ongoing potential for contributions to their field.

Best Publications

  • The Use of Single-Subject Research to Identify Evidence-Based Practice in Special Education:

    Robert H. Horner;Edward G. Carr;James Halle;Gail McGee

  • Effective Teaching: Principles and Procedures of Applied Behavior Analysis with Exceptional Students

    Mark Wolery;Donald B. Bailey;George M. Sugai

  • Comprehensive synthesis of early intensive behavioral interventions for young children with autism based on the UCLA young autism project model.

    Brian Reichow;Mark Wolery

  • A Unified Theory of Practice in Early Intervention/Early Childhood Special Education Evidence-Based Practices

    Samuel L. Odom;Mark Wolery

  • Comparison of Overlap Methods for Quantitatively Synthesizing Single-Subject Data

    Mark Wolery;Matthew Busick;Brian Reichow;Erin E. Barton

  • Using Point-of-View Video Modeling to Teach Play to Preschoolers With Autism

    Jeffrey F. Hine;Mark Wolery

  • Effective and Efficient Procedures for the Transfer of Stimulus Control.

    Mark Wolery;David L. Gast

  • System of Least Prompts: A Literature Review of Procedural Parameters

    Patricia M. Doyle;Mark Wolery;Melinda Jones Ault;David L. Gast

  • Use of Songs to Promote Independence in Morning Greeting Routines For Young Children With Autism

    Petra Kern;Mark Wolery;David Aldridge

  • Comparative Single-Subject Research Description of Designs and Discussion of Problems

    Ariane Holcombe;Mark Wolery;David L. Gast

  • Teaching Infants and Preschoolers with Disabilities, (2nd ed.)

    M Wolery;Donald Bailey

  • Measures in Intervention Research with Young Children Who Have Autism

    Mark Wolery;Ann N. Garfinkle

  • Teaching Pretend Play to Children With Disabilities: A Review of the Literature

    Erin E. Barton;Mark Wolery

  • THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A CONSTANT TIME-DELAY PROCEDURE TO TEACH CHAINED RESPONSES TO ADOLESCENTS WITH MENTAL RETARDATION

    John W. Schuster;David L. Gast;Mark Wolery;Sharon Guiltinan

  • Constant time delay with discrete responses: a review of effectiveness and demographic, procedural, and methodological parameters.

    Mark Wolery;Ariane Holcombe;Catherine Cybriwsky;Patricia Munson Doyle

  • Developmental Correlates of Different Types of Motor Imitation in Young Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders

    Andrea McDuffie;Andrea McDuffie;Lauren Turner;Wendy Stone;Paul Yoder

  • Assessing Infants and Preschoolers with Special Needs

    Mary Anne McLean;Donald B. Bailey;Mark Wolery

  • Interpreting Results of Single-Subject Research Designs

    Mark Wolery;Susan R Harris

  • Early intervention as we know it

    Donald B. Bailey;Lynette S. Aytch;Samuel L. Odom;Frank Symons

  • Instructive feedback: Review of parameters and effects

    Margaret G. Werts;Mark Wolery;Ariane Holcombe;David L. Gast

Frequent Co-Authors

David L. Gast
David L. Gast University of Georgia
Brian Reichow
Brian Reichow University of Connecticut Health Center
Donald B. Bailey
Donald B. Bailey Research Triangle Park Foundation
John W. Schuster
John W. Schuster University of Kentucky
Ann P. Kaiser
Ann P. Kaiser Vanderbilt University
Belva C. Collins
Belva C. Collins University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Mary Louise Hemmeter
Mary Louise Hemmeter Vanderbilt University
Samuel L. Odom
Samuel L. Odom University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Glen Dunlap
Glen Dunlap University of South Florida
Paul J. Yoder
Paul J. Yoder Vanderbilt University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in a career in psychology or counseling, there are several flexible and affordable online degrees across the USA. Many universities offer accredited programs that blend foundational theory with practical skills, preparing graduates for work in schools, healthcare, mental health centers, or private practice.

Before enrolling, it’s important to consider factors such as state licensure requirements, program specializations, and tuition costs. For example, students searching for affordable counseling degrees in Michigan can access respected programs that don’t compromise on quality. Similarly, there are most affordable counseling degree programs in Minnesota that offer comprehensive training and support.

If you are located in the South, you may want to explore the most affordable counseling degree programs in Nashville as well as the cheapest counseling degrees in New Orleans for additional budget-friendly options. Graduates from these programs can pursue roles like counseling, clinical psychology, or school psychology—with online degrees providing both cost savings and flexible pacing for busy learners.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Wolery

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles