World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mary Louise Hemmeter

Mary Louise Hemmeter

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 40 8182 7638 4384 3990 108 7644

Mary Louise Hemmeter publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mary Louise Hemmeter between 1989 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mary Louise Hemmeter published across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025, averaging 3.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 2011. 8 of the 116 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 2011. 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 4 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 5 publications 2025: 3 publications
1989 2025

116 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mary Louise Hemmeter: publications per year, 1989 to 2025
Year Publications
1989 1
1990 1
1991 0
1992 1
1993 0
1994 2
1995 3
1996 4
1997 2
1998 4
1999 2
2000 3
2001 4
2002 3
2003 4
2004 1
2005 2
2006 4
2007 1
2008 4
2009 4
2010 3
2011 8
2012 4
2013 4
2014 5
2015 5
2016 6
2017 2
2018 4
2019 2
2020 3
2021 7
2022 4
2023 1
2024 5
2025 3
Total 116
Download as CSV

Mary Louise Hemmeter publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary Louise Hemmeter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 108 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 108
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Mary Louise Hemmeter D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary Louise Hemmeter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 40
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Mary Louise Hemmeter is affiliated with Vanderbilt University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on psychology and social sciences, with key subfields including education, developmental and educational psychology, clinical psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and general health professions.

The scientist's main research topics involve early childhood education and development, behavioral and psychological studies, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, family and disability support research, educational and psychological assessments, child development and digital technology, and parental involvement in education.

Mary Louise Hemmeter has contributed to several recent academic publications. Selected papers include:

  • Corollary child outcomes from the Pyramid Model professional development intervention efficacy trial, 2020, Early Childhood Research Quarterly
  • Program-wide implementation of the Pyramid Model: Supporting fidelity at the program and classroom levels, 2021, Early Childhood Research Quarterly

Frequent coauthors in Hemmeter's body of work include:

  • Erin E. Barton
  • Abby L. Taylor
  • Lise Fox
  • Jessica K. Hardy
  • Adrienne K. Golden

The scientist's work is often published in the following venues:

  • Topics in Early Childhood Special Education
  • Early Childhood Research Quarterly
  • Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions
  • Journal of Early Intervention
  • Infants & Young Children

Best Publications

  • The Teaching Pyramid: A Model for Supporting Social Competence and Preventing Challenging Behavior in Young Children

    Lise Fox;Glen Dunlap;Mary Louise Hemmeter;Gail E. Joseph

  • Social and Emotional Foundations for Early Learning: A Conceptual Model for Intervention.

    Mary Louise Hemmeter;Michaelene Ostrosky;Lise Fox

  • Prevention and Intervention with Young Children's Challenging Behavior: Perspectives regarding Current Knowledge:

    Glen Dunlap;Philip S. Strain;Lise Fox;Judith J. Carta

  • Response to Intervention and the Pyramid Model.

    Lise Fox;Judith Carta;Phillip S. Strain;Glen Dunlap

  • Supporting Implementation of Evidence-Based Practices through Practice-Based Coaching.

    Patricia A. Snyder;Mary Louise Hemmeter;Lise Fox

  • Enhanced Milieu Teaching: Effects of Parent-Implemented Language Intervention

    Mary Louise Hemmeter;Ann P. Kaiser

  • Coaching Early Childhood Special Educators to Implement a Comprehensive Model for Promoting Young Children's Social Competence.

    Lise Fox;Mary Louise Hemmeter;Patricia Snyder;Denise Perez Binder

  • Evaluating the Implementation of the "Pyramid Model for Promoting Social-Emotional Competence" in Early Childhood Classrooms.

    Mary Louise Hemmeter;Patricia A. Snyder;Lise Fox;James Algina

  • Impact of Performance Feedback Delivered via Electronic Mail on Preschool Teachers' Use of Descriptive Praise.

    Mary Louise Hemmeter;Patricia Snyder;Kiersten Kinder;Kathleen Artman

  • Predictors of developmentally appropriate classroom practices in kindergarten through third grade

    Kelly L. Maxwell;R.A. McWilliam;Mary Louise Hemmeter;Melinda Jones Ault

  • Preparing Early Childhood Educators to Address Young Children's Social-Emotional Development and Challenging Behavior: A Survey of Higher Education Programs in Nine States.

    Mary Louise Hemmeter;Rosa Milagros Santos;Michaelene M. Ostrosky

  • Blended Practices for Teaching Young Children in Inclusive Settings

    Jennifer Grisham-Brown;Mary Louise Hemmeter;Kristie Pretti-Frontczak

  • A Program-Wide Model of Positive Behavior Support in Early Childhood Settings

    Mary Louise Hemmeter;Lise Fox;Susan Jack;Linda Broyles

  • Using Coaching to Increase Preschool Teachers' Use of Emergent Literacy Teaching Strategies.

    Wu Ying Hsieh;Mary Louise Hemmeter;Jeanette A. McCollum;Michaelene M. Ostrosky

  • Characterizing Key Features of the Early Childhood Professional Development Literature.

    Patricia Snyder;Mary Louise Hemmeter;Kathleen Artman Meeker;Kiersten Kinder

  • The Effects of Teaching Parents to Use Responsive Interaction Strategies

    Ann P. Kaiser;Mary Louise Hemmeter;Michaelene M. Ostrosky;Rebecca Fischer

  • Professional Development in Early Childhood Intervention: Where We Stand on the Silver Anniversary of PL 99-457

    Patricia Snyder;Mary Louise Hemmeter;Tara McLaughlin

  • Naturalistic Instructional Approaches in Early Learning: A Systematic Review

    Patricia A. Snyder;Salih Rakap;Mary Louise Hemmeter;Tara W. McLaughlin

  • The Effects of Embedded Skill Instruction on the Acquisition of Target and Nontarget Skills in Preschoolers with Developmental Delays

    Stefanie Daugherty;Jennifer Grisham-Brown;Mary Louise Hemmeter

  • A Programwide Model for Supporting Social Emotional Development and Addressing Challenging Behavior in Early Childhood Settings

    Lise Fox;Mary Louise Hemmeter

Frequent Co-Authors

Lise Fox
Lise Fox University of South Florida
Patricia Snyder
Patricia Snyder University of Florida
Michaelene M. Ostrosky
Michaelene M. Ostrosky University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Ann P. Kaiser
Ann P. Kaiser Vanderbilt University
John W. Schuster
John W. Schuster University of Kentucky
Glen Dunlap
Glen Dunlap University of South Florida
Belva C. Collins
Belva C. Collins University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Phillip S. Strain
Phillip S. Strain University of Denver
Mark Wolery
Mark Wolery Vanderbilt University
Judith J. Carta
Judith J. Carta University of Kansas

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens doors to a wide variety of career pathways. One of the most promising options is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), a role in high demand across the United States. Whether you’re studying fully online or planning future in-person training, it’s important to review state and city-specific requirements.

The Cincinnati bcba requirements and Cleveland bcba requirements highlight the necessity for a qualifying graduate degree, supervised experience, and passing the BCBA exam. Similarly, understanding how to become a bcba in Colorado Springs can help guide your educational and professional planning if you aim to work in that region.

If you’re considering working elsewhere in Ohio, it’s also helpful to explore the requirements for becoming a bcba in Columbus. Each location may have slightly different steps or additional licensing needs. Researching these pathways early can ensure you make informed choices as you pursue your psychology studies online or in person.

Best Scientists Citing Mary Louise Hemmeter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles