World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Charles R. Greenwood

Charles R. Greenwood

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
65
Citations
15725
World Ranking
2838
National Ranking
1638

Charles R. Greenwood publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles R. Greenwood sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 185 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Charles R. Greenwood D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles R. Greenwood sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Charles R. Greenwood is affiliated with the University of Kansas in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on fields related to psychology and social sciences, with a distinct emphasis on developmental and educational psychology, education, clinical psychology, pediatrics, perinatology, child health, and also astronomy and astrophysics.

The main topics covered in their work include early childhood education and development, language development and disorders, family and disability support research, infant development and preterm care, reading and literacy development, behavioral and psychological studies, and educational and psychological assessments.

Greenwood has published multiple papers in several academic venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • Education and Treatment of Children
  • Journal of Special Education Technology
  • Journal of Early Intervention
  • Topics in Early Childhood Special Education
  • Exceptional Children

Among the recent papers authored or co-authored by Greenwood are:

  • "Technology to Guide Data-Driven Intervention Decisions: Effects on Language Growth of Young Children at Risk for Language Delay" (2020), published in Exceptional Children
  • "Technology to Facilitate Progress Monitoring of Infant-Toddler Growth and Development: Measuring Implementation in Community-Based Agencies" (2022), published in Journal of Special Education Technology
  • "Remote Use of Individual Growth and Development Indicators (IGDIs) for Infants and Toddlers" (2021), published in Journal of Early Intervention
  • "Progress Toward an Early Social Indicator for Infants and Toddlers" (2020), published in Journal of Early Intervention
  • "Advancing Children's Learning Through Innovations in the Measurement of Literacy Engagement" (2021), published in Topics in Early Childhood Special Education

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Greenwood include:

  • Judith J. Carta
  • Dale Walker
  • Alana G. Schnitz
  • Jay Buzhardt
  • Dwight Irvin

Best Publications

  • Quality Indicators for Group Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Research in Special Education:

    Russell Gersten;Lynn S. Fuchs;Donald Compton;Michael Coyne

  • Prediction of school outcomes based on early language production and socioeconomic factors

    Dale Walker;Charles R. Greenwood;Betty Hart;Judith Carta

  • Longitudinal Effects of Classwide Peer Tutoring.

    Charles R. Greenwood;Joseph C. Delquadri;R. Vance Hall

  • Academic Engagement: Current Perspectives on Research and Practice

    Charles R. Greenwood;Betty T. Horton;Cheryl A. Utley

  • Classwide Peer Tutoring

    Joseph Delquadri;Charles R. Greenwood;Debra Whorton;Judith J. Carta

  • Longitudinal Analysis of Time, Engagement, and Achievement in At-Risk versus Non-Risk Students

    Charles R. Greenwood

  • Mapping the Early Language Environment Using All-Day Recordings and Automated Analysis

    Jill Gilkerson;Jeffrey A. Richards;Steven F. Warren;Judith K. Montgomery

  • Academic Benefits of Peer Tutoring: A Meta-Analytic Review of Single-Case Research.

    Lisa Bowman-Perrott;Heather Davis;Kimberly Vannest;Lauren Williams

  • The use of peer tutoring strategies in classroom management and educational instruction.

    Charles R. Greenwood;Judith J. Carta;R. Vance Hall

  • The Research to Practice Gap in Special Education.

    Charles R. Greenwood;Mary Abbott

  • Recommended Outcomes for Families of Young Children with Disabilities.

    Donald B. Bailey;Mary Beth Bruder;Kathy Hebbeler;Judith Carta

  • Use of Evidence-Based, Small-Group Reading Instruction for English Language Learners in Elementary Grades: Secondary-Tier Intervention

    Debra Kamps;Mary Abbott;Charles Greenwood;Carmen Arreaga-Mayer

  • Teacher- versus peer-mediated instruction: an ecobehavioral analysis of achievement outcomes.

    Charles R. Greenwood;Granger Dinwiddie;Barbara Terry;Linda Wade

  • The Response to Intervention (RTI) Approach in Early Childhood

    Charles R. Greenwood;Tracy Bradfield;Ruth Kaminski;Maura Linas

  • Research to Practice: A "Blueprint" for Closing the Gap in Local Schools.

    Mary Abbott;Cheryl Walton;Yolanda Tapia;Charles R. Greenwood

  • ClassWide Peer Tutoring Learning Management System Applications with Elementary-Level English Language Learners

    Charles R. Greenwood;Carmen Arreaga-Mayer;Cheryl A. Utley;Karen M. Gavin

  • Assessing Children’s Home Language Environments Using Automatic Speech Recognition Technology

    Charles R. Greenwood;Kathy Thiemann-Bourque;Dale Walker;Jay Buzhardt

  • Effects of Small-Group Reading Instruction and Curriculum Differences for Students Most at Risk in Kindergarten Two-Year Results for Secondary- and Tertiary-Level Interventions

    Debra Kamps;Mary Abbott;Charles Greenwood;Howard Wills

  • Effects of Viewing the Television Program Between the Lions on the Emergent Literacy Skills of Young Children

    Deborah L. Linebarger;Anjelika Z. Kosanic;Charles R. Greenwood;Nii Sai Doku

  • Achievement, placement, and services: Middle school benefits of Classwide Peer Tutoring used at the elementary school.

    Charles R. Greenwood;Barbara Terry;Cheryl A. Utley;Debra Montagna

  • Classwide Peer Tutoring

    Charles Greenwood

Frequent Co-Authors

Judith J. Carta
Judith J. Carta University of Kansas
Scott R. McConnell
Scott R. McConnell University of Minnesota
Debra Kamps
Debra Kamps University of Kansas
Hill M. Walker
Hill M. Walker University of Oregon
Howard Goldstein
Howard Goldstein University of South Florida
Mark R. Shinn
Mark R. Shinn University of Oregon
Hyman Hops
Hyman Hops Oregon Research Institute
Georgios D. Sideridis
Georgios D. Sideridis Boston Children's Hospital
D. Kimbrough Oller
D. Kimbrough Oller University of Memphis
Donna Spiker
Donna Spiker SRI International

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in applying your psychology studies to a rewarding career? One popular pathway is becoming a substance abuse counselor. Professionals in this field work directly with individuals struggling with addiction, providing support, guidance, and treatment planning.

While licensure and educational requirements vary across locations, a background in psychology is highly valued. For those considering this career in California, the substance abuse counselor requirements in Sacramento outline specific coursework and certification steps. In Minnesota, the process of becoming a substance abuse counselor in Saint Paul provides a detailed look at state-specific licensing.

For those in Texas, you should review the substance abuse counselor requirements in San Antonio. Similarly, the San Diego substance abuse counselor certification requirements give insights into California's certification process.

Online psychology degrees can offer flexible routes to meeting these requirements. Completing an accredited program can prepare you for entry-level roles and start your journey on this meaningful career path.

Best Scientists Citing Charles R. Greenwood

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles