World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Best Female Scientists
2025
Award Badge
Psychology
USA
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Best Female Scientists

D-Index
128
Citations
60378
World Ranking
385
National Ranking
233

Psychology

D-Index
128
Citations
61017
World Ranking
187
National Ranking
117

Lynn S. Fuchs publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lynn S. Fuchs sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 442 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Lynn S. Fuchs D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lynn S. Fuchs sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 128 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in United States Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Best Female Scientists Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Psychology in United States Leader Award
  • 2014 - Distinguished Contributions to Research in Education Award, American Educational Research Association
  • 2012 - Fellow of the American Educational Research Association
  • 1998 - Palmer O. Johnson Memorial Award, American Educational Research Association

Overview

Lynn S. Fuchs is affiliated with Vanderbilt University in the United States and has produced extensive work primarily in the fields of psychology, mathematics, and social sciences. Their research spans 31 publications in psychology, 24 in mathematics, and 20 in social sciences, with a significant focus on developmental and educational psychology, statistics and probability, and education.

Their research topics focus on cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills, reading and literacy development, educational and psychological assessments, mathematics education and teaching techniques, disability education and employment, parental involvement in education, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Fuchs has published frequently in several academic venues, including:

  • Journal of Learning Disabilities (8 publications)
  • Journal of Educational Psychology (5 publications)
  • Exceptional Children (3 publications)
  • Child Development Perspectives (2 publications)
  • Learning Disabilities Research and Practice (2 publications)

Notable recent papers include:

  • "Closing the word-problem achievement gap in first grade: Schema-based word-problem intervention with embedded language comprehension instruction," 2020, Journal of Educational Psychology
  • "Bringing Data-Based Individualization to Scale: A Call for the Next-Generation Technology of Teacher Supports," 2021, Journal of Learning Disabilities
  • "Alternative paths to improved word-problem performance: An advantage for embedding prealgebraic reasoning instruction within word-problem intervention," 2020, Journal of Educational Psychology
  • "Building word-problem solving and working memory capacity: A randomized controlled trial comparing three intervention approaches," 2022, Journal of Educational Psychology
  • "Connections between mathematics and reading development: Numerical cognition mediates relations between foundational competencies and later academic outcomes," 2021, Journal of Educational Psychology

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Douglas Fuchs (20 publications)
  • Daniel R. Espinas (6 publications)
  • Pamela M. Seethaler (5 publications)
  • Kristopher J. Preacher (5 publications)
  • Eunsoo Cho (5 publications)

Lynn S. Fuchs has received several awards from the American Educational Research Association, such as the Distinguished Contributions to Research in Education Award in 2014, the Fellowship in 2012, and the Palmer O. Johnson Memorial Award in 1998.

Best Publications

  • Introduction to Response to Intervention: What, Why, and How Valid Is It?.

    Douglas Fuchs;Lynn S. Fuchs

  • Oral Reading Fluency as an Indicator of Reading Competence: A Theoretical, Empirical, and Historical Analysis

    Lynn S. Fuchs;Douglas Fuchs;Michelle K. Hosp;Joseph R. Jenkins

  • Inclusive Schools Movement and the Radicalization of Special Education Reform

    Douglas Fuchs;Lynn S. Fuchs

  • Teaching Reading Comprehension Strategies to Students With Learning Disabilities: A Review of Research

    Russell Gersten;Lynn S. Fuchs;Joanna P. Williams;Scott Baker

  • Quality Indicators for Group Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Research in Special Education:

    Russell Gersten;Lynn S. Fuchs;Donald Compton;Michael Coyne

  • Redefining Learning Disabilities as Inadequate Response to Instruction: The Promise and Potential Problems

    Sharon Vaughn;Lynn S. Fuchs

  • Effects of Systematic Formative Evaluation: A Meta-Analysis:

    Lynn S. Fuchs;Douglas Fuchs

  • Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies: Making Classrooms More Responsive to Diversity:

    Douglas Fuchs;Lynn S. Fuchs;Patricia G. Mathes;Deborah C. Simmons

  • The Prevention, Identification, and Cognitive Determinants of Math Difficulty.

    Lynn S. Fuchs;Donald L. Compton;Douglas Fuchs;Kimberly Paulsen

  • The cognitive correlates of third-grade skill in arithmetic, algorithmic computation, and arithmetic word problems

    Lynn S. Fuchs;Douglas Fuchs;Donald L. Compton;Sarah R. Powell

  • Formative Evaluation of Academic Progress: How Much Growth Can We Expect?.

    Lynn S. Fuchs;Douglas Fuchs;Carol L. Hamlett;Lynn Walz

  • Sources of Individual Differences in Reading Comprehension and Reading Fluency.

    Joseph R. Jenkins;Lynn S. Fuchs;Paul van den Broek;Christine Espin

  • Using Curriculum‐Based Measurement to Improve Student Achievement: Review of Research

    Pamela M. Stecker;Lynn S. Fuchs;Douglas Fuchs

  • The Effects of Frequent Curriculum-Based Measurement and Evaluation on Pedagogy, Student Achievement, and Student Awareness of Learning

    Lynn S. Fuchs;Stanley L. Deno;Phyllis K. Mirkin

  • The Validity of Informal Reading Comprehension Measures

    Lynn S. Fuchs;Douglas Fuchs;Linn Maxwell

  • Treatment Validity: A Unifying Concept for Reconceptualizing the Identification of Learning Disabilities.

    Lynn S. Fuchs;Douglas Fuchs

  • The “Blurring” of Special Education in a New Continuum of General Education Placements and Services:

    Douglas Fuchs;Lynn S. Fuchs;Pamela M. Stecker

  • Using Curriculum-based Measurement to Establish Growth Standards for Students with Learning Disabilities

    Stanley L. Deno;Lynn S. Fuchs;Douglas Marston;Jongho Shin

  • Smart RTI: A Next-Generation Approach to Multilevel Prevention

    Douglas Fuchs;Lynn S. Fuchs;Donald L. Compton

  • A Model for Implementing Responsiveness to Intervention

    Lynn S. Fuchs;Douglas Fuchs

Frequent Co-Authors

Douglas Fuchs
Douglas Fuchs Vanderbilt University
Carol L. Hamlett
Carol L. Hamlett Vanderbilt University
Donald L. Compton
Donald L. Compton Florida State University
Paul T. Cirino
Paul T. Cirino University of Houston
Stanley L. Deno
Stanley L. Deno University of Minnesota
Robert S. Siegler
Robert S. Siegler Columbia University
Nancy C. Jordan
Nancy C. Jordan University of Delaware
Jack M. Fletcher
Jack M. Fletcher University of Houston
Russell Gersten
Russell Gersten University of Oregon
Kristen L. McMaster
Kristen L. McMaster University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens doors to diverse academic and career options. With many universities now offering flexible online programs, you can find opportunities that match your interests and fit your schedule. As you weigh your choices, it’s helpful to consider respected rankings and resources to identify programs with strong reputations and specialized tracks.

For those interested in regional options, several reputable programs stand out. The best psychology program rankings in the Midwest highlight top universities offering a range of online and in-person degrees. If you are considering Nebraska, check out the top psychology degrees in Nebraska for tailored pathways and specializations.

Urban hubs also offer renowned programs. The best psychology degree programs ranking in New York City features schools with powerful alumni networks and diverse career support. In the Northeast, the top psychology degrees in Newark provide options focused on social work, counseling, and research.

No matter your location or career ambition, exploring these rankings helps you find the right online psychology program to start your professional journey.

Best Scientists Citing Lynn S. Fuchs

Trending Scientists