World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 45 6716 6258 3640 3308 234 7878

Gerald Tindal publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Gerald Tindal between 1982 and 2019, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Gerald Tindal published across 38 years, from 1982 to 2019, averaging 6.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2012. 3 of the 240 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2019. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2012. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 7 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 5 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 3 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 30 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 1 publication
1982 2019

240 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Gerald Tindal: publications per year, 1982 to 2019
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 0
1984 2
1985 4
1986 4
1987 7
1988 1
1989 5
1990 5
1991 5
1992 8
1993 3
1994 4
1995 2
1996 5
1997 1
1998 3
1999 3
2000 3
2001 2
2002 3
2003 7
2004 8
2005 5
2006 9
2007 12
2008 8
2009 8
2010 13
2011 15
2012 30
2013 17
2014 8
2015 7
2016 7
2017 12
2018 2
2019 1
Total 240
Download as CSV

Gerald Tindal publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gerald Tindal sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 231–240 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 234 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226 234
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Gerald Tindal D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gerald Tindal sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 45
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Gerald Tindal is affiliated with the University of Oregon in the United States. Their academic and research profile is characterized by involvement in multiple areas related to their institution, although specific publication details and research topics are not currently listed.

There are no records of recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues associated with Gerald Tindal at this time. Additionally, data on book publications and fields or subfields of study is not available.

Similarly, there is no information on main topics of their research work or awards that have been received.

Given the absence of documented publications, collaborations, or defined areas of focus, Gerald Tindal's profile primarily reflects their current academic affiliation without detailed public data on research output or scientific contributions.

Best Publications

  • Oral Reading Fluency Norms: A Valuable Assessment Tool for Reading Teachers

    Jan Hasbrouck;Gerald A. Tindal

  • Curriculum-Based Oral Reading Fluency Norms for Students in Grades 2 through 5.

    Jan E. Hasbrouck;Gerald Tindal

  • Grade‐Level Invariance of a Theoretical Causal Structure Predicting Reading Comprehension With Vocabulary and Oral Reading Fluency

    Paul Yovanoff;Luke Duesbery;Julie Alonzo;Gerald Tindal

  • Accommodating Students with Disabilities on Large-Scale Tests: An Experimental Study:

    Gerald Tindal;Bill Heath;Keith Hollenbeck;Patricia Almond

  • Special Education Referrals as an Index of Teacher Tolerance: Are Teachers Imperfect Tests?:

    Mark R. Shinn;Gerald A. Tindal;Deborah A. Spira

  • Using Oral Reading Rate to Predict Student Performance on Statewide Achievement Tests

    Lindy Crawford;Gerald Tindal;Steve> Stieber

  • A Summary of Research on Test Changes: An Empirical Basis for Defining Accommodations.

    Gerald Tindal;Lynn Fuchs

  • Classroom Based Assessment: Evaluating Instructional Outcomes

    Gerald A. Tindal;Douglas B. Marston

  • Examining the Structure of Reading Comprehension: Do Literal, Inferential, and Evaluative Comprehension Truly Exist?.

    Deni Basaraba;Paul Yovanoff;Julie Alonzo;Gerald Tindal

  • Reading as an Access to Mathematics Problem Solving on Multiple-Choice Tests for Sixth-Grade Students

    Robert Helwig;Marick A. Rozek-tedesco;Gerald Tindal;Bill Heath

  • Assessment of Written Expression for Students in Compensatory and Special Education Programs

    Gerald Tindal;Richard Parker

  • Teachers' Knowledge of Accommodations As a Validity Issue in High-Stakes Testing

    Keith Hollenbeck;Gerald Tindal;Patricia Almond

  • Influence of elementary student gender on teachers' perceptions of mathematics achievement

    Robert Helwig;Lisbeth Anderson;Gerald Tindal

  • A Comparison of Differences Between Students Labeled Learning Disabled and Low Achieving on Measures of Classroom Performance

    Mark R. Shinn;James E. Ysseldyke;Stanley L. Deno;Gerald A. Tindal

  • Effective School Consultation: An Interactive Approach

    George M. Sugai;Gerald A. Tindal

  • An Experimental Analysis of Accommodation Decisions on Large-Scale Mathematics Tests

    Robert Helwig;Gerald Tindal

  • An Application of Curriculum-Based Assessment: The Use of Direct and Repeated Measurement

    Gary Germann;Gerald Tindal

  • Recommendations for Accommodations: Implications of (In)consistency

    Leanne R. Ketterlin-Geller;Julie Alonzo;Jenelle Braun-Monegan;Gerald Tindal

  • Using a Concept-Grounded, Curriculum-Based Measure in Mathematics to Predict Statewide Test Scores for Middle School Students with LD

    Robert Helwig;Lisbeth Anderson;Gerald Tindal

  • The Adequacy of Tools for Assessing Reading Competence: A Framework and Review:

    Edward J. Kame’enui;Lynn Fuchs;David J. Francis;Roland Good

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark R. Shinn
Mark R. Shinn University of Oregon
Stephen N. Elliott
Stephen N. Elliott Arizona State University
Lynn S. Fuchs
Lynn S. Fuchs Vanderbilt University
Stanley L. Deno
Stanley L. Deno University of Minnesota
Paul Yovanoff
Paul Yovanoff Southern Methodist University
Richard I. Parker
Richard I. Parker Texas A&M University
Douglas Fuchs
Douglas Fuchs Vanderbilt University
Edward J. Kameenui
Edward J. Kameenui University of Oregon
Scott K. Baker
Scott K. Baker Southern Methodist University
James E. Ysseldyke
James E. Ysseldyke University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Psychology degree opens doors to various related fields, such as Social Work, Counseling, and Human Services. Many students consider these pathways because they offer the chance to make a positive impact on individuals and communities. With the growth of online education, accredited programs across the U.S. are more accessible and affordable than ever.

If you’re searching for affordable options, there are numerous affordable social work programs in California that combine flexibility with a reputation for quality. Similarly, those looking in urban hubs can explore affordable social work programs in Chicago for accessible, budget-friendly choices.

For students in the Midwest, some of the cheapest social work degrees in Columbus are available through online and hybrid learning formats. Additionally, Texas-based learners should consider the cheapest social work programs in Denton for affordable, career-focused educational paths.

These degrees can lead to careers in mental health, community organizations, schools, or advocacy, offering a wide range of opportunities for those passionate about helping others.

Best Scientists Citing Gerald Tindal

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles