World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
56
Citations
15025
World Ranking
4156
National Ranking
2322

Stanley L. Deno publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stanley L. Deno sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 125 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Stanley L. Deno D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stanley L. Deno sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stanley L. Deno was affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States. Their academic and research activities were connected to this institution during their career.

There are no recorded recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues available for Stanley L. Deno. Similarly, data on book publications and specific fields or subfields of study has not been provided.

No specific topics of research or study have been documented in the available data. Likewise, no awards or honors have been recorded for this scientist.

The available information confirms that Stanley L. Deno is deceased. The lack of detailed documentation limits a full account of their contributions but situates them primarily within the academic environment of the University of Minnesota.

Best Publications

  • Curriculum-Based Measurement: The Emerging Alternative:

    Stanley L. Deno

  • Developments in Curriculum-Based Measurement

    Stanley L. Deno

  • Sources of Individual Differences in Reading Comprehension and Reading Fluency.

    Joseph R. Jenkins;Lynn S. Fuchs;Paul van den Broek;Christine Espin

  • The Effects of Frequent Curriculum-Based Measurement and Evaluation on Pedagogy, Student Achievement, and Student Awareness of Learning

    Lynn S. Fuchs;Stanley L. Deno;Phyllis K. Mirkin

  • Using Curriculum-based Measurement to Establish Growth Standards for Students with Learning Disabilities

    Stanley L. Deno;Lynn S. Fuchs;Douglas Marston;Jongho Shin

  • Identifying valid measures of reading.

    Stanley L. Deno;Phyllis K. Mirkin;Berttram Chiang

  • Paradigmatic Distinctions between Instructionally Relevant Measurement Models

    Lynn S. Fuchs;Stanley L. Deno

  • Curriculum-based measurement oral reading as an indicator of reading achievement: a meta-analysis of the correlational evidence.

    Amy L. Reschly;Todd W. Busch;Joseph Betts;Stanley L. Deno

  • Progress Monitoring Measures in Mathematics: A Review of the Literature

    Anne Foegen;Cynthia Jiban;Stanley Deno

  • Generalizations from Five Years of Research on Assessment and Decision Making: The University of Minnesota Institute:

    James E. Ysseldyke;Martha Thurlow;Janet Graden;Caren Wesson

  • Data-Based Program Modification: A Manual.

    Stanley L. Deno;Phyllis K. Mirkin

  • Formative evaluation of individual student programs: A new role for school psychologists.

    Stanley L. Deno

  • Valid Measurement Procedures for Continuous Evaluation of Written Expression

    Stanley L. Deno;Douglas Marston;Phyllis Mirkin

  • Technical Adequacy of the Maze Task for Curriculum-Based Measurement of Reading Growth:

    Jongho Shin;Stanley L. Deno;Christine Espin

  • Developing Curriculum-Based Measurement Systems For Data-Based Special Education Problem Solving

    Stanley L. Deno;Lynn S. Fuchs

  • Identifying Indicators of Written Expression Proficiency for Middle School Students

    Christine Espin;Jongho Shin;Stanley L. Deno;Stacy Skare

  • Accuracy and Fluency in List and Context Reading of Skilled and RD Groups: Absolute and Relative Performance Levels

    Joseph R. Jenkins;Lynn S. Fuchs;Paul Van Den Broek;Christine Espin

  • Oral Reading and Maze Measures as Predictors of Success for English Learners on a State Standards Assessment

    Hilda Ives Wiley;Stanley L. Deno

  • Effects of Curriculum within Curriculum-Based Measurement

    Lynn S. Fuchs;Stanley L. Deno

  • DEVELOPING A SCHOOL-WIDE PROGRESS-MONITORING SYSTEM

    Stanley L. Deno;Amy L. Reschly;Erica S. Lembke;Deanne Magnusson

  • Must Instructionally Useful Performance Assessment Be Based in the Curriculum

    Lynn S. Fuchs;Stanley L. Deno

Frequent Co-Authors

Lynn S. Fuchs
Lynn S. Fuchs Vanderbilt University
Christine A. Espin
Christine A. Espin Leiden University
Geoffrey M. Maruyama
Geoffrey M. Maruyama University of Minnesota
Joseph R. Jenkins
Joseph R. Jenkins University of Washington
Gerald Tindal
Gerald Tindal University of Oregon
Douglas Fuchs
Douglas Fuchs Vanderbilt University
Kristen L. McMaster
Kristen L. McMaster University of Minnesota
James E. Ysseldyke
James E. Ysseldyke University of Minnesota
Paul van den Broek
Paul van den Broek Leiden University
Matthew K. Burns
Matthew K. Burns University of Missouri

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degrees and specialized career paths, particularly in counseling and therapy. One popular route is becoming a marriage and family therapist (MFT). These professionals help individuals, couples, and families overcome challenges and improve their relationships.

Requirements to become an MFT can differ by location. For example, you can find mft requirements in Orlando or explore what it takes for how to become a marriage and family therapist in Philadelphia. In Phoenix, guidelines are outlined under mft requirements in Phoenix, while those interested in Pennsylvania can refer to how to become an mft in Pittsburgh.

With demand for mental health professionals growing, many students pursue online psychology degrees to gain flexibility while preparing for licensure and advanced roles. Be sure to check local regulations and consider your career goals when choosing your online program. Diverse pathways and accredited programs allow you to tailor your education for the best career outcomes.

Best Scientists Citing Stanley L. Deno

Recently Published Articles