World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 46 6458 6013 3497 3176 151 7844

Stephanie Al Otaiba publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Stephanie Al Otaiba between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Stephanie Al Otaiba published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 6.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2014. 5 of the 160 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2014. 2001: 4 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 3 publications
2001 2025

160 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Stephanie Al Otaiba: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 4
2002 2
2003 2
2004 2
2005 4
2006 4
2007 4
2008 4
2009 6
2010 5
2011 7
2012 9
2013 5
2014 15
2015 7
2016 11
2017 8
2018 14
2019 10
2020 9
2021 10
2022 6
2023 7
2024 2
2025 3
Total 160
Download as CSV

Stephanie Al Otaiba publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephanie Al Otaiba sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 151 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576 151
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Stephanie Al Otaiba D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephanie Al Otaiba sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 46
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - Fellow of the American Educational Research Association

Overview

Stephanie Al Otaiba is affiliated with Southern Methodist University in the United States. Their research primarily lies at the intersection of psychology and social sciences, with a strong focus on developmental and educational psychology. The main topics of their academic work include reading and literacy development, cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills, early childhood education and development, behavioral and psychological studies, language development and disorders, education, achievement, and giftedness, as well as writing and handwriting education.

They have published extensively in various academic venues. Frequent publication venues include the Journal of Learning Disabilities, Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, Remedial and Special Education, Reading and Writing, and Reading Research Quarterly.

Some of their recent papers are:

  • What We Know and Need to Know about Literacy Interventions for Elementary Students with Reading Difficulties and Disabilities, including Dyslexia (2022, Reading Research Quarterly)
  • Supporting language and literacy development with intensive small-group interventions: An early childhood efficacy study (2021, Early Childhood Research Quarterly)
  • Comparing the Effects of Reading Intervention Versus Reading and Mindset Intervention for Upper Elementary Students With Reading Difficulties (2020, Journal of Learning Disabilities)
  • Development and promise of a vocabulary intelligent tutoring system for Second-Grade Latinx English learners (2020, Journal of Research on Technology in Education)
  • Growth on sublexical fluency progress monitoring measures in early kindergarten and relations to word reading acquisition (2020, Journal of School Psychology)

Stephanie Al Otaiba frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including Jeanne Wanzek, Yaacov Petscher, Christopher Schatschneider, Wilhelmina van Dijk, and Rachel E. Donegan. Their partnerships indicate ongoing research efforts involving multiple scholars.

Their contributions extend across both broad and specific fields. Main areas of study encompass psychology and social sciences, while subfields focus on developmental and educational psychology, education, statistics and probability, experimental and cognitive psychology, and social psychology.

In recognition of their professional work, Stephanie Al Otaiba was named a Fellow of the American Educational Research Association in 2020.

Best Publications

  • Characteristics of Children Who Are Unresponsive to Early Literacy Intervention A Review of the Literature

    Stephanie Al Otaiba;Douglas Fuchs

  • Who Are the Young Children for Whom Best Practices in Reading Are Ineffective? An Experimental and Longitudinal Study

    Stephanie Al Otaiba;Douglas Fuchs

  • Is Reading Important in Reading-Readiness Programs? A Randomized Field Trial with Teachers as Program Implementers.

    Douglas Fuchs;Lynn S. Fuchs;Anneke Thompson;Stephanie Al Otaiba

  • Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies in Reading Extensions for Kindergarten, First Grade, and High School

    Douglas Fuchs;Lynn S. Fuchs;Anneke Thompson;Ebba Svenson

  • Evidence-Based Reading Instruction for Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders

    Kelly J. Whalon;Stephanie Al Otaiba;Monica E. Delano

  • Componential skills of beginning writing: An exploratory study

    Young-Suk Kim;Stephanie Al Otaiba;Cynthia Puranik;Jessica Sidler Folsom

  • A Longitudinal Cluster-Randomized Controlled Study on the Accumulating Effects of Individualized Literacy Instruction on Students’ Reading From First Through Third Grade

    Carol Mc Donald Connor;Carol Mc Donald Connor;Frederick J. Morrison;Barry Fishman;Elizabeth C. Crowe

  • Assessment Data-Informed Guidance to Individualize Kindergarten Reading Instruction: Findings from a Cluster-Randomized Control Field Trial.

    Stephanie Al Otaiba;Carol M Connor;Jessica Sidler Folsom;Luana Greulich

  • To Wait in Tier 1 or Intervene Immediately A Randomized Experiment Examining First-Grade Response to Intervention in Reading

    Stephanie Al Otaiba;Carol M. Connor;Jessica S. Folsom;Jeanne Wanzek

  • Is Scientifically Based Reading Instruction Effective for Students With Below-Average IQs?:

    Jill H. Allor;Patricia G. Mathes;J. Kyle Roberts;Jennifer P. Cheatham

  • Dyslexia and the Brain: What Does Current Research Tell Us?

    Roxanne F. Hudson;Leslie High;Stephanie Al Otaiba

  • Writing fluency and quality in kindergarten and first grade: The role of attention, reading, transcription, and oral language.

    Shawn Kent;Jeanne Wanzek;Yaacov Petscher;Stephanie Dent Al Otaiba

  • Effects of a Peer-Mediated Program on Reading Skill Acquisition for Two-Way Bilingual First-Grade Classrooms.

    Mary Beth Calhoon;Stephanie Al Otaiba;David Cihak;Amber King

  • Toward an understanding of dimensions, predictors, and the gender gap in written composition

    Young-Suk Kim;Stephanie Al Otaiba;Jeanne Wanzek;Brandy Gatlin

  • Reading First kindergarten classroom instruction and students' growth in phonological awareness and letter naming–decoding fluency

    Stephanie Al Otaiba;Carol Connor;Holly Lane;Marcia L. Kosanovich

  • Kindergarten Predictors of Third Grade Writing.

    Young-Suk Kim;Stephanie Al Otaiba;Jeanne Wanzek

  • Evaluating the Dimensionality of First-Grade Written Composition

    Young-Suk Kim;Stephanie Al Otaiba;Jessica S. Folsom;Luana Greulich

  • Exploring the Importance of Reading Programs for Kindergartners with Disabilities in Mainstream Classrooms

    Douglas Fuchs;Lynn S. Fuchs;Anneke Thompson;Stephanie Al Otaiba

  • Exploring the amount and type of writing instruction during language arts instruction in kindergarten classrooms

    Cynthia S. Puranik;Stephanie Al Otaiba;Jessica Folsom Sidler;Luana Greulich

  • The Relation Between Global and Specific Mindset With Reading Outcomes for Elementary School Students

    Yaacov Petscher;Stephanie Al Otaiba;Jeanne Wanzek;Brenna Rivas

  • ASSESSMENT DATA–INFORMED GUIDANCE TO INDIVIDUALIZE KINDERGARTEN READING INSTRUCTION

    Stephanie Al Otaiba;Carol M. Connor;Jessica S. Folsom;Luana Greulich

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeanne Wanzek
Jeanne Wanzek Vanderbilt University
Yaacov Petscher
Yaacov Petscher Florida State University
Carol McDonald Connor
Carol McDonald Connor University of California, Irvine
Christopher Schatschneider
Christopher Schatschneider Florida State University
Paul Yovanoff
Paul Yovanoff Southern Methodist University
Christopher J. Lonigan
Christopher J. Lonigan Florida State University
Richard K. Wagner
Richard K. Wagner Florida State University
Douglas Fuchs
Douglas Fuchs Vanderbilt University
Michael P. Kaschak
Michael P. Kaschak Florida State University
Beth M. Phillips
Beth M. Phillips Florida State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Psychology opens doors to diverse career opportunities, from counseling to research and education. Many students are drawn to online programs for their flexibility and affordability—key factors when planning for a future in mental health and counseling.

Cost is a significant consideration for aspiring counselors. Affordable online degrees let students achieve their goals without accumulating extensive debt. For example, those interested in studying in the Midwest may consider affordable counseling programs in Saint Paul, which offer strong foundational training and support services.

On the West Coast, several flexible options exist. Prospective students can explore affordable counseling degrees in San Diego or affordable counseling degrees in Seattle, both of which cater to varied interests in online and hybrid learning.

For those in the Southwest, affordable counseling degrees in Tempe offer competitive tuition rates and access to vibrant professional communities.

Regardless of location, affordable online programs in Psychology and Counseling help students launch fulfilling careers while balancing personal and financial needs.

Best Scientists Citing Stephanie Al Otaiba

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles