World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
81
Citations
23098
World Ranking
1397
National Ranking
74

Ludo Verhoeven publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ludo Verhoeven sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 557 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Ludo Verhoeven D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ludo Verhoeven sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ludo Verhoeven is affiliated with Radboud University in the Netherlands. Their research mainly intersects the fields of psychology, with a primary focus on developmental and educational psychology. Their scholarly work encompasses cognitive neuroscience, education, statistics and probability, and linguistics and language.

The main topics covered by Verhoeven's research include:

  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Language Development and Disorders
  • Cognitive and Developmental Aspects of Mathematical Skills
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Multilingual Education and Policy

Verhoeven's publication record includes work in several frequent journals and venues, such as:

  • Learning and Individual Differences
  • Annals of Dyslexia
  • Journal of Research in Reading
  • Reading and Writing
  • Scientific Studies of Reading

Their recent papers demonstrate a focus on reading and literacy development, including:

  • "Universals in Learning to Read Across Languages and Writing Systems," 2021, Scientific Studies of Reading
  • "Computer-supported early literacy intervention effects in preschool and kindergarten: A meta-analysis," 2020, Educational Research Review

In addition to their own works, Verhoeven has collaborated frequently with other researchers in the field. Notable coauthors include:

  • Eliane Segers
  • Harry Knoors
  • Tijs Kleemans
  • Elise de Bree
  • Marco van de Ven

Best Publications

  • Language proficiency and reading ability in first- and second-language learners

    Mienke Droop;Ludo Verhoeven

  • Prediction of the development of reading comprehension: A longitudinal study.

    Ludo Verhoeven;Jan van Leeuwe

  • Transfer in Bilingual Development: The Linguistic Interdependence Hypothesis Revisited

    Ludo T Verhoeven

  • Components in Early Second Language Reading and Spelling

    Ludo Verhoeven

  • Cross-linguistic perspectives on the development of text-production abilities: Speech and writing

    Ruth Aronson Berman;Ludo Th Verhoeven

  • Vocabulary Growth and Reading Development across the Elementary School Years.

    Ludo Verhoeven;Jan van Leeuwe;Anne Vermeer

  • Acquisition of reading in a second language

    Ludo T. Verhoeven

  • Child and Home Predictors of Early Numeracy Skills in Kindergarten.

    Tijs Kleemans;Marieke Peeters;Eliane Segers;Ludo Verhoeven

  • The relationship between the reading and signing skills of deaf children in bilingual education programs

    Daan Hermans;Harry Knoors;Ellen Ormel;Ludo Verhoeven

  • Relating Events in Narrative, Volume 2 : Typological and Contextual Perspectives

    Sven Strömqvist;Ludo Verhoeven

  • Predictors of reading and spelling abilities in first and second language learners

    Wilma Jongejan;Ludo Verhoeven;Linda S. Siegel

  • Background Knowledge, Linguistic Complexity, and Second-Language Reading Comprehension:

    Mienke Droop;Ludo Verhoeven

  • Advances in Text Comprehension: Model, Process and Development

    Ludo Verhoeven;Charles Perfetti

  • The simple view of second language reading throughout the primary grades

    Ludo Verhoeven;Jan van Leeuwe

  • Early bilingualism, language transfer, and phonological awareness

    L.T.W. Verhoeven

  • Pragmatic language impairment and associated behavioural problems

    Mieke P. Ketelaars;Juliane Cuperus;Kino Jansonius;Ludo Verhoeven

  • Relating events in narrative : typological and contextual perspectives

    S. Strömqvist;L.T.W. Verhoeven;A. Aksu-Koç

  • Multimedia support of early literacy learning

    Eliane Segers;Ludo Verhoeven

  • Behaviour problems in children with language impairment.

    John van Daal;Ludo Verhoeven;Hans van Balkom

  • Long‐term effects of computer training of phonological awareness in kindergarten

    Eliane Segers;Ludo Verhoeven

  • Precursors of functional literacy

    Ludo Th Verhoeven;Carsten Elbro;Pieter Reitsma

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles A. Perfetti
Charles A. Perfetti University of Pittsburgh
James M. McQueen
James M. McQueen Radboud University
Janet G. van Hell
Janet G. van Hell Pennsylvania State University
Kenneth R. Pugh
Kenneth R. Pugh Haskins Laboratories
Peter F. de Jong
Peter F. de Jong University of Amsterdam
Marinus Voeten
Marinus Voeten Radboud University
Antonius H. N. Cillessen
Antonius H. N. Cillessen Radboud University
Peter Hagoort
Peter Hagoort Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics
Holger Mitterer
Holger Mitterer University of Malta
Bert Steenbergen
Bert Steenbergen Radboud University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to many online degrees and diverse career pathways. Many students consider programs such as an online Bachelor’s or Master’s in Psychology, which can lead to roles in counseling, research, human resources, or education. Flexible online degrees allow you to study while working or managing other responsibilities.

For those interested in becoming a licensed therapist, understanding state-specific requirements is crucial. For example, if you’re considering practice in California, it’s important to know the licensed therapist requirements in Oakland. Requirements may vary in different regions; compare this with the licensed therapist requirements in Oklahoma City or see what’s needed for becoming a licensed therapist in Omaha.

Each state has unique licensure procedures, education prerequisites, and supervised experience requirements. If your goal is to practice in Florida, make sure you review the Orlando licensed therapist requirements.

No matter where you choose to practice, a psychology degree gained online can offer the background and flexibility needed to pursue rewarding careers in mental health and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Ludo Verhoeven

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles