World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
32
Citations
3082
World Ranking
11013
National Ranking
479

Inge Molenaar publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Inge Molenaar sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 110 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Inge Molenaar D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Inge Molenaar sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Measuring self-regulated learning and the role of AI: Five years of research using multimodal multichannel data

    Unknown

  • Sequential and temporal characteristics of self and socially regulated learning

    Inge Molenaar;Sanna Järvelä

  • Effects of real-time analytics-based personalized scaffolds on students' self-regulated learning

    Unknown

  • Metacognitive scaffolding in an innovative learning arrangement

    Inge Molenaar;Carla A. M. van Boxtel;Peter J. C. Sleegers

  • Detecting Emotions through Electrodermal Activity in Learning Contexts: A Systematic Review

    Anne Horvers;Natasha Tombeng;Tibor Bosse;Ard W. Lazonder

  • Metacognitive scaffolding during collaborative learning: a promising combination

    Inge Molenaar;Peter Sleegers;Carla van Boxtel

  • Dynamic scaffolding of socially regulated learning in a computer-based learning environment

    Inge Molenaar;Claudia Roda;Carla van Boxtel;Peter Sleegers

  • How Teachers Make Dashboard Information Actionable

    I. Molenaar;C. A. N. Knoop-van Campen

  • Dissecting Sequences of Regulation and Cognition: Statistical Discourse Analysis of Primary School Children's Collaborative Learning.

    Inge Molenaar;Ming Ming Chiu

  • The effects of scaffolding metacognitive activities in small groups

    Inge Molenaar;Carla A. M. van Boxtel;Peter J. C. Sleegers

  • Scaffolding of small groups' metacognitive activities with an avatar

    Inge Molenaar;Ming Ming Chiu;Peter J. C. Sleegers;Carla A. M. van Boxtel

  • Towards investigating the validity of measurement of self-regulated learning based on trace data

    Unknown

  • The effect of dynamic computerized scaffolding on collaborative discourse

    I. Molenaar;C.A.M. van Boxtel;P. Sleegers

  • Improving the measurement of self-regulated learning using multi-channel data

    Unknown

  • What can moment-by-moment learning curves tell about students' self-regulated learning?

    Inge Molenaar;Anne Horvers;Ryan S. Baker

  • Effects of Internal and External Conditions on Strategies of Self-regulated Learning: A Learning Analytics Study

    Unknown

  • Teacher dashboards in practice: Usage and impact

    Inge Molenaar;Carolien Knoop van Campen

  • The Dynamics Between Self-Regulated Learning and Learning Outcomes: an Exploratory Approach and Implications

    Unknown

  • How teacher characteristics relate to how teachers use dashboards: Results from two case studies in k–12

    Anouschka van Leeuwen;Carolien A. N. Knoop-van Campen;Inge Molenaar;Nikol Rummel

  • Personalized visualizations to promote young learners' SRL: the learning path app

    Inge Molenaar;Anne Horvers;Rick Dijkstra;Ryan S. Baker

Frequent Co-Authors

Ludo Verhoeven
Ludo Verhoeven Radboud University
Peter Sleegers
Peter Sleegers University of Twente
Eliane Segers
Eliane Segers Radboud University
Alyssa Friend Wise
Alyssa Friend Wise Vanderbilt University
Ming Ming Chiu
Ming Ming Chiu University of Hong Kong
Ryan S. Baker
Ryan S. Baker University of Pennsylvania
Dragan Gasevic
Dragan Gasevic Monash University
Maria Bannert
Maria Bannert Technical University of Munich
Shane Dawson
Shane Dawson University of South Australia
Roger Azevedo
Roger Azevedo University of Central Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Inge Molenaar

Recently Published Articles