World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 52 4918 4559 47 46 213 15371

Ming Ming Chiu publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ming Ming Chiu between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ming Ming Chiu published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 9.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2022. 31 of the 284 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2022. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 4 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 22 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 28 publications 2023: 24 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 17 publications
1996 2025

284 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ming Ming Chiu: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 0
1998 0
1999 1
2000 2
2001 3
2002 0
2003 1
2004 4
2005 2
2006 3
2007 5
2008 7
2009 4
2010 10
2011 11
2012 9
2013 12
2014 14
2015 10
2016 13
2017 12
2018 16
2019 16
2020 22
2021 23
2022 28
2023 24
2024 14
2025 17
Total 284
Download as CSV

Ming Ming Chiu publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ming Ming Chiu sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 211–220 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 213 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313 213
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Ming Ming Chiu D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ming Ming Chiu sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390 52
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Ming Ming Chiu is affiliated with the University of Hong Kong in China and has contributed extensively to the fields of social sciences and psychology, with a particular focus on education and developmental and educational psychology. Their research spans key subfields including sociology and political science, social psychology, and literature and literary theory.

The main areas of study that define their body of work include:

  • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Multilingual Education and Policy
  • Second Language Learning and Teaching
  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Educational Games and Gamification
  • EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning

Chiu's publications cover a variety of venues, with recurrent contributions to:

  • International Journal of Communication Systems
  • Children and Youth Services Review
  • Journal of Educational Computing Research
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Current Psychology

Some of the recent papers authored in collaboration with others include:

  • "Connecting teacher and student motivation: Student-perceived teacher need-supportive practices and student need satisfaction" (2021) published in Contemporary Educational Psychology
  • "Effects of Game-Based Learning on Students' Critical Thinking: A Meta-Analysis" (2021) published in Journal of Educational Computing Research
  • "Technology integration for young children during COVID-19: Towards future online teaching" (2021) published in British Journal of Educational Technology
  • "The Relationship Between Self-Control and Internet Addiction Among Students: A Meta-Analysis" (2021) published in Frontiers in Psychology
  • "Effects of Game-Based Learning on Students' Achievement in Science: A Meta-Analysis" (2022) published in Journal of Educational Computing Research

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Chiu include Hao Lei, Habib Ammari, Μάρκος Αναστασόπουλος, Hamid R. Arabnia, and Zhiquan Bai, with cooperative work indicating substantial professional networks particularly in educational computing and psychology-related research.

Best Publications

  • Effects on teachers' self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Teacher gender, years of experience, and job stress.

    Robert M. Klassen;Ming Ming Chiu

  • The occupational commitment and intention to quit of practicing and pre-service teachers: Influence of self-efficacy, job stress, and teaching context

    Robert M. Klassen;Ming Ming Chiu

  • Building a culture of collaboration through hybrid language practices

    Kris D. Gutierrez;Patricia Baquedano-Lopez;Hector H. Alvarez;Ming Ming Chiu

  • GENDER, CONTEXT, AND READING: A COMPARISON OF STUDENTS IN 43 COUNTRIES

    Ming Ming Chiu;Catherine McBride-Chang

  • Family and motivation effects on mathematics achievement: Analyses of students in 41 countries

    Ming Ming Chiu;Zeng Xihua

  • Leadership for social justice in Hong Kong schools: Addressing mechanisms of inequality

    Ming Ming Chiu;Allan David Walker

  • Effects of Resources, Inequality, and Privilege Bias on Achievement: Country, School, and Student Level Analyses

    Ming Ming Chiu;Lawrence Khoo

  • The Relationship between Teacher Support and Students' Academic Emotions: A Meta-Analysis.

    Hao Lei;Yunhuo Cui;Ming Ming Chiu

  • Flowing toward Correct Contributions during Group Problem Solving: A Statistical Discourse Analysis

    Ming Ming Chiu

  • Adapting Teacher Interventions to Student Needs During Cooperative Learning: How to Improve Student Problem Solving and Time On-Task

    Ming Ming Chiu

  • Relations of mathematics self-concept and its calibration with mathematics achievement: Cultural differences among fifteen-year-olds in 34 countries

    Ming Ming Chiu;Robert M. Klassen

  • A study of primary school students' interest, collaboration attitude, and programming empowerment in computational thinking education

    Siu Cheung Kong;Ming Ming Chiu;Ming Lai

  • Group Problem-Solving Processes: Social Interactions and Individual Actions

    Ming Ming Chiu

  • Immigrant students' emotional and cognitive engagement at school: a multilevel analysis of students in 41 countries.

    Ming Ming Chiu;Suet-ling Pong;Izumi Mori;Bonnie Wing-Yin Chow

  • Students’ Sense of Belonging at School in 41 Countries Cross-Cultural Variability

    Ming Ming Chiu;Bonnie Wing-Yin Chow;Catherine McBride;Stefan Thomas Mol

  • Effects of Inequality, Family and School on Mathematics Achievement: Country and Student Differences

    Ming Ming Chiu

  • Families, economies, cultures, and science achievement in 41 countries: country-, school-, and student-level analyses.

    Ming Ming Chiu

  • Rudeness and status effects during group problem solving: Do they bias evaluations and reduce the likelihood of correct solutions?

    Ming Ming Chiu;Lawrence Khoo

  • Culture, motivation, and reading achievement: High school students in 41 countries

    Ming Ming Chiu;Bonnie Wing Yin Chow

  • Universals and specifics in learning strategies: Explaining adolescent mathematics, science, and reading achievement across 34 countries ☆

    Ming Ming Chiu;Bonnie Wing-Yin Chow;Catherine Mcbride-Chang

Frequent Co-Authors

Alyssa Friend Wise
Alyssa Friend Wise Vanderbilt University
Inge Molenaar
Inge Molenaar Radboud University
Catherine McBride-Chang
Catherine McBride-Chang Purdue University West Lafayette
Nancy Law
Nancy Law University of Hong Kong
Robert M. Klassen
Robert M. Klassen University of York
Simone Kauffeld
Simone Kauffeld Technische Universität Braunschweig
Baruch B. Schwarz
Baruch B. Schwarz Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Thomas Goetz
Thomas Goetz University of Vienna
Gail D. Heyman
Gail D. Heyman University of California, San Diego
Nathan C. Hall
Nathan C. Hall McGill University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to a wide range of rewarding career pathways, many of which can be started or advanced through online studies. Social work remains a popular option for graduates, offering positions in schools, hospitals, and community agencies. Each state has unique education and licensing requirements, making it important to understand the exact steps needed depending on where you wish to practice.

For example, if you’re interested in becoming a social worker in Virginia, you’ll need to fulfill specific degree and supervised experience requirements. Those looking toward the West Coast should review the Washington social work license requirements to ensure they meet the right academic and fieldwork standards. If your goals include practicing in Appalachia, pay close attention to the West Virginia social work education requirements. In the Midwest, understanding the Wisconsin social work education requirements will help ensure a smooth path to licensure.

Online degree programs in psychology and social work can provide the flexible, accredited education needed to succeed on these diverse career pathways. Always research state-specific criteria to align your studies and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Ming Ming Chiu

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles