World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 36 11369 11046 4678 4479 113 4528

Alyssa Friend Wise publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Alyssa Friend Wise between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Alyssa Friend Wise published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 6.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2019. 11 of the 140 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2019. 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 7 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 6 publications
2004 2025

140 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Alyssa Friend Wise: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 2
2005 1
2006 2
2007 0
2008 3
2009 6
2010 1
2011 7
2012 8
2013 7
2014 9
2015 10
2016 9
2017 13
2018 10
2019 17
2020 4
2021 12
2022 6
2023 2
2024 5
2025 6
Total 140
Download as CSV

Alyssa Friend Wise publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alyssa Friend Wise sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 112–121 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 113 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497 113
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Alyssa Friend Wise D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alyssa Friend Wise sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990 36
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Alyssa Friend Wise is affiliated with Vanderbilt University in the United States and has contributed to research primarily in the field of Computer Science with a focus on computer science applications, developmental and educational psychology, education, information systems, and artificial intelligence.

Their work centers extensively on topics related to online learning and analytics, innovative teaching and learning methods, e-learning and knowledge management, explainable artificial intelligence, artificial intelligence in healthcare and education, student assessment and feedback, and educational assessment and improvement.

Frequent co-authors in their research include Yeonji Jung, Xavier Ochôa, Inge Molenaar, Simon Knight, and Qiujie Li. Alyssa Friend Wise has published in multiple venues, notably:

  • Journal of Learning Analytics
  • Journal of Computing in Higher Education
  • Educational Technology Research and Development
  • British Journal of Educational Technology
  • Interactive Learning Environments

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Alyssa Friend Wise are:

  • What Makes Learning Analytics Research Matter, 2021, Journal of Learning Analytics
  • Supporting the shift to digital with student-centered learning analytics, 2020, Educational Technology Research and Development
  • The equalizing effect of teacher dashboards on feedback in K-12 classrooms, 2021, Interactive Learning Environments
  • Learning Analytics Impact: Critical Conversations on Relevance and Social Responsibility, 2020, Journal of Learning Analytics
  • Advancing equity and inclusion in educational practices with AI-powered educational decision support systems (AI-EDSS), 2024, British Journal of Educational Technology

Best Publications

  • Handbook of Learning Analytics

    Charles Lang;George Siemens;Alyssa Wise;Dragan Gasevic

  • Designing pedagogical interventions to support student use of learning analytics

    Alyssa Friend Wise

  • Why Theory Matters More than Ever in the Age of Big Data

    Alyssa Friend Wise;David Williamson Shaffer

  • Visions of CSCL: eight provocations for the future of the field

    Alyssa Friend Wise;Baruch B. Schwarz

  • Getting Down to Details: Using Theories of Cognition and Learning to Inform Tangible User Interface Design

    Alissa Nicole Antle;Alyssa Friend Wise

  • Broadening the notion of participation in online discussions: examining patterns in learners’ online listening behaviors

    Alyssa Friend Wise;Jennifer Speer;Farshid Marbouti;Ying Ting Hsiao

  • Analyzing temporal patterns of knowledge construction in a role-based online discussion

    Alyssa Friend Wise;Ming Ming Chiu

  • Teaching with analytics: Towards a situated model of instructional decision-making

    Alyssa Friend Wise;Yeonji Jung

  • Learning Analytics for Online Discussions: Embedded and Extracted Approaches

    Alyssa Friend Wise;Yuting Zhao;Simone Nicole Hausknecht

  • Time for Change: Why Learning Analytics Needs Temporal Analysis

    Simon Knight;Alyssa Friend Wise;Bodong Chen

  • Attending to others’ posts in asynchronous discussions: Learners’ online “listening” and its relationship to speaking

    Alyssa Friend Wise;Simone Nicole Hausknecht;Yuting Zhao

  • Learning communities in the crowd: Characteristics of content related interactions and social relationships in MOOC discussion forums

    Alyssa Friend Wise;Yi Cui

  • Mining for gold: Identifying content-related MOOC discussion threads across domains through linguistic modeling

    Alyssa Friend Wise;Yi Cui;Wan Qi Jin;Jovita M. Vytasek

  • Learning Analytics in Medical Education Assessment: The Past, the Present, and the Future

    Teresa Chan;Stefanie Sebok-Syer;Brent Thoma;Alyssa Wise

  • Towards more precise design guidance: specifying and testing the functions of assigned student roles in online discussions

    Alyssa Friend Wise;Marzieh Saghafian;Poornima Padmanabhan

  • Learning analytics for online discussions: a pedagogical model for intervention with embedded and extracted analytics

    Alyssa Friend Wise;Yuting Zhao;Simone Nicole Hausknecht

  • Microanalytic Case studies of Individual Participation Patterns in an Asynchronous Online Discussion in an Undergraduate Blended Course

    Alyssa Friend Wise;Nishan Perera;Ying Ting Hsiao;Jennifer Speer

  • Developing Learning Analytics Design Knowledge in the "Middle Space": The Student Tuning Model and Align Design Framework for Learning Analytics Use

    Alyssa Friend Wise;Jovita Maria Vytasek;Simone Hausknecht;Yuting Zhao

  • Learning analytics implementation design

    Alyssa Wise;J.M. Vytasek

  • Youtopia: a collaborative, tangible, multi-touch, sustainability learning activity

    Alissa N. Antle;Alyssa F. Wise;Amanda Hall;Saba Nowroozi

  • Bringing order to chaos in MOOC discussion forums with content-related thread identification

    Alyssa Friend Wise;Yi Cui;Jovita Vytasek

  • Educating Data Scientists and Data Literate Citizens for a New Generation of Data.

    Alyssa Friend Wise

Frequent Co-Authors

Alissa N. Antle
Alissa N. Antle Simon Fraser University
Ming Ming Chiu
Ming Ming Chiu University of Hong Kong
Trena M. Paulus
Trena M. Paulus East Tennessee State University
Inge Molenaar
Inge Molenaar Radboud University
Carolyn Penstein Rosé
Carolyn Penstein Rosé Carnegie Mellon University
Baruch B. Schwarz
Baruch B. Schwarz Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Curtis J. Bonk
Curtis J. Bonk Indiana University
Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver
Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver Indiana University
David Williamson Shaffer
David Williamson Shaffer University of Wisconsin–Madison
Jonathan Sherbino
Jonathan Sherbino McMaster University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens the door to numerous educational and career options. Many students are now choosing to advance their skills through flexible online programs that suit their unique academic backgrounds and budgets.

Those seeking to build a solid foundation can start with associates degrees online, which offer a faster route to entry-level tech roles and easy transfer to bachelor’s programs. For further specialization and leadership opportunities, consider enrolling in one of the most in demand masters degrees. These programs help boost earning potential and open doors to high-growth areas like artificial intelligence and cybersecurity.

Cost is a concern for many, but there are numerous affordable online colleges offering reputable computer science programs without breaking the bank. Plus, applicants with less-than-perfect transcripts can take advantage of college with low gpa admission options, ensuring that everyone has a pathway to a rewarding career in tech.

Best Scientists Citing Alyssa Friend Wise

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles