World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
62
Citations
21083
World Ranking
1238
National Ranking
575

Curtis J. Bonk publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Curtis J. Bonk sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 240 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Curtis J. Bonk D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Curtis J. Bonk sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Curtis J. Bonk is affiliated with Indiana University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Social Sciences and Computer Science, with notable contributions in Education, Computer Science Applications, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Information Systems, and Artificial Intelligence.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Online Learning and Analytics
  • Online and Blended Learning
  • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • E-Learning and Knowledge Management
  • Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Educational Games and Gamification

Their frequent co-authors are:

  • Meina Zhu
  • Min Young Doo
  • Zixi Li
  • Chaoran Wang
  • Heeok Heo

The venues where Curtis J. Bonk publishes most frequently include:

  • Online Learning
  • Distance Education
  • Educational Technology Research and Development
  • TechTrends
  • Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Curtis J. Bonk include:

  • "Self-directed learning in MOOCs: exploring the relationships among motivation, self-monitoring, and self-management," 2020, Educational Technology Research and Development
  • "A Meta-Analysis of Scaffolding Effects in Online Learning in Higher Education," 2020, The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning
  • "Enhancing learning engagement during COVID-19 pandemic: Self-efficacy in time management, technology use, and online learning environments," 2021, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
  • "The effects of self-efficacy, self-regulation and social presence on learning engagement in a large university class using flipped Learning," 2020, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
  • "A synthesis of systematic review research on emerging learning environments and technologies," 2020, Educational Technology Research and Development

Best Publications

  • The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs

    Curtis J. Bonk;Charles R. Graham;Jay Cross;Michael G. Moore

  • Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course

    Noriko Hara;Curtis Jay Bonk;Charoula Angeli

  • Searching for learner-centered, constructivist, and sociocultural components of collaborative educational learning tools.

    Curtis Jay Bonk;Kira S. King

  • The World Is Open: How Web Technology Is Revolutionizing Education

    Curtis J. Bonk

  • The Future of Online Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: The Survey Says...

    Kyong-Jee Kim;Curtis J. Bonk

  • DOES SENSE OF COMMUNITY MATTER? an Examination of Participants' Perceptions of Building Learning Communities in Online Courses

    Xiaojing Liu;Richard J. Magjuka;Curtis J. Bonk;Seung-hee Lee

  • Online Training in an Online World.

    Curtis J. Bonk

  • Future Directions of Blended Learning in Higher Education and Workplace Learning Settings

    Curtis J. Bonk;Kyong-Jee Kim;TingTing Zeng

  • Communication in a web-based conferencing system: the quality of computer-mediated interactions

    Charoula Angeli;Nicos Valanides;Curtis J. Bonk

  • The Importance of Interaction in Web-Based Education: A Program-Level Case Study of Online MBA Courses

    Bude Su;Curtis J. Bonk;Richard J. Magjuka;Xiaojing Liu

  • Cross-cultural Comparisons of Online Collaboration

    Kyong-Jee Kim;Curtis J. Bonk

  • Online MBA students' perceptions of online learning: Benefits, challenges, and suggestions

    Kyong-Jee Kim;Shijuan Liu;Curtis J. Bonk

  • Electronic Collaborators: Learner-Centered Technologies for Literacy, Apprenticeship, and Discourse

    Curtis Jay Bonk;Kira S. King

  • Alternative instructional strategies for creative and critical thinking in the accounting curriculum

    Curtis Jay Bonk;G Stevenson Smith

  • Extending sociocultural theory to adult learning.

    Curtis Jay Bonk;Kyung A. Kim

  • Introducing the R2D2 Model: Online Learning for the Diverse Learners of This World

    Curtis J. Bonk;Ke Zhang

  • A Dozen Recommendations for Placing the Student at the Center of Web-Based Learning.

    Curtis Jay Bonk;Jack A Cummings

  • Examining the Roles of Blended Learning Approaches in Computer- Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) Environments: A Delphi Study

    Hyo Jeong So;Curtis J. Bonk

  • MOOCs and open education around the world

    Curtis J. Bonk;Mimi Miyoung Lee;Thomas C. Reeves;Thomas H. Reynolds

  • Empowering Online Learning: 100+ Activities for Reading, Reflecting, Displaying, and Doing

    Curtis J. Bonk;Ke Zhang

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas C. Reeves
Thomas C. Reeves University of Georgia
Noriko Hara
Noriko Hara Indiana University
Charles R. Graham
Charles R. Graham Brigham Young University
Ron Oliver
Ron Oliver Edith Cowan University
Khe Foon Hew
Khe Foon Hew University of Hong Kong
Alyssa Friend Wise
Alyssa Friend Wise Vanderbilt University
Punya Mishra
Punya Mishra Arizona State University
Erno Lehtinen
Erno Lehtinen University of Turku
George Veletsianos
George Veletsianos University of Minnesota
Sanna Järvelä
Sanna Järvelä University of Oulu

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities opens many flexible study and career options. For those seeking convenience and speed, there are now online master programs that can be completed in just one year, helping you upskill quickly without putting your life on hold.

If you’re looking to fast-track your undergraduate education, consider 2 year accelerated bachelor degrees. These programs help you enter the workforce sooner or pave the way for advanced graduate study.

For students interested in social work, quality does not have to come at a high price. There are many cheap online msw programs that offer affordable tuition without sacrificing essential hands-on experience and professional accreditation.

Aspiring behavioral analysts can benefit from bcba masters programs online, which provide industry-recognized credentials while offering flexibility for working adults.

Online degrees in social sciences and humanities continue to grow, making education more accessible and opening doors to meaningful career paths.

Best Scientists Citing Curtis J. Bonk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles