World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 58 1639 1469 122 113 241 15066

Peter Goodyear publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter Goodyear between 1983 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter Goodyear published across 43 years, from 1983 to 2025, averaging 6 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2017. 4 of the 256 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1983 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2017. 1983: 1 publication 1984: 1 publication 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 23 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 25 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 1 publication
1983 2025

256 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter Goodyear: publications per year, 1983 to 2025
Year Publications
1983 1
1984 1
1985 1
1986 0
1987 2
1988 0
1989 3
1990 1
1991 2
1992 8
1993 1
1994 2
1995 2
1996 3
1997 0
1998 3
1999 9
2000 6
2001 5
2002 9
2003 4
2004 6
2005 5
2006 5
2007 9
2008 6
2009 5
2010 8
2011 11
2012 4
2013 23
2014 14
2015 9
2016 10
2017 25
2018 11
2019 14
2020 7
2021 8
2022 5
2023 4
2024 3
2025 1
Total 256
Download as CSV

Peter Goodyear publications per year - data summary

  • Peter Goodyear, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of Sydney, has 256 publications recorded across 43 years, from 1983 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1983 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2017, with 25 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1983, 1984, 1985, 1990 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 3 of the 43 years in the span carry no publications at all (1986, 1988 and 1997).
  • The rate of publication averages 6.0 papers per year over the whole span, or 6.4 per year counting only the 40 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 21 publications, 8% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1983-1997: 27 publications (1.8 per year); 1998-2012: 95 publications (6.3 per year); 2013-2025: 134 publications (10.3 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Peter Goodyear publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Goodyear sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 234–243 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 241 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170 241
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter Goodyear publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 44–53 to 570+ publications.
  • Peter Goodyear, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of Sydney, records 241 publications - the 77th percentile of the discipline.
  • 77% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Peter Goodyear, and about 23% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 164–173 publications range, and Peter Goodyear ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 114–123 publications, holding 474 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 174–183 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 570 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Peter Goodyear D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Goodyear sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95 58
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Peter Goodyear D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 71 ranges running from 30 to 100+ D-Index.
  • Peter Goodyear, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of Sydney, records 58 D-Index - the 79th percentile of the discipline.
  • 79% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Peter Goodyear, and about 21% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 45 D-Index range, and Peter Goodyear ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 313 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more, 97 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Peter Goodyear is affiliated with the University of Sydney in Australia and has contributed extensively to the fields of social sciences, computer science, and psychology, with a particular focus on education and its intersection with technology. Their research spans multiple disciplines, emphasizing innovative education practices, digital education, and higher education engagement.

The scientist's work addresses several main topics, including:

  • Innovative Education and Learning Practices
  • Digital Education and Society
  • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Higher Education Practises and Engagement
  • E-Learning and Knowledge Management
  • Education and Technology Integration
  • Educational Environments and Student Outcomes

Peter Goodyear's research contribution includes key papers such as:

  • "Activity-Centred Analysis and Design (ACAD): Core purposes, distinctive qualities and current developments" (2021), published in Educational Technology Research and Development
  • "Design and co-configuration for hybrid learning: Theorising the practices of learning space design" (2020), published in British Journal of Educational Technology
  • "Realising the Good University: Social Innovation, Care, Design Justice and Educational Infrastructure" (2021), published in Postdigital Science and Education

Their work often appears alongside contributions from other researchers, including frequent coauthors such as Lina Markauskaitė, Lucila Carvalho, Chrysi Rapanta, Luca Botturi, and Lourdes Guàrdia Ortiz.

Major venues for Peter Goodyear's publications include:

  • Postdigital Science and Education
  • British Journal of Educational Technology
  • Educational Technology Research and Development
  • Journal of the Learning Sciences
  • Learning Culture and Social Interaction

Their main fields of study break down into:

  • Social Sciences
  • Computer Science
  • Psychology

Within these fields, specific subfields focus on:

  • Education
  • Information Systems
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Computer Science Applications

Best Publications

  • Competences for Online Teaching: A Special Report

    Peter Goodyear;Gilly Salmon;J. Michael Spector;Christine Steeples

  • Research focus and methodological choices in studies into students' experiences of blended learning in higher education

    Ana-Maria Bliuc;Peter Goodyear;Robert A. Ellis

  • Educational design and networked learning: Patterns, pattern languages and design practice

    Peter Goodyear

  • Students' Experiences of E-Learning in Higher Education: The Ecology of Sustainable Innovation

    Robert A. Ellis;Peter Goodyear

  • Psychological foundations for networked learning

    Peter Goodyear

  • Technology-Enhanced Learning: Design Patterns and Pattern Languages

    Peter Goodyear;Symeon Retalis

  • Inquiry-based learning in higher education: principal forms, educational objectives, and disciplinary variations

    Anindito Aditomo;Peter Goodyear;Ana-Maria Bliuc;Robert A. Ellis

  • Epistemic Fluency and Professional Education

    Lina Markauskaite;Peter Goodyear

  • Advances in Research on Networked Learning

    Peter M. Goodyear;Sheena Banks;Vivien Hodgson;David McConnell

  • How and what university students learn through online and face-to-face discussion: conceptions, intentions and approaches

    Robert A. Ellis;Peter Goodyear;Michael Prosser;Agi O'Hara

  • Models of learning space: integrating research on space, place and learning in higher education

    R. A. Ellis;P. Goodyear

  • Teacher thinking, beliefs and knowledge in higher education

    Nirah Hativa;Peter Goodyear

  • The Architecture of Productive Learning Networks

    Lucila Carvalho;Peter Goodyear

  • Engineering students' conceptions of and approaches to learning through discussions in face-to-face and online contexts

    Robert A. Ellis;Peter Goodyear;Rafael A. Calvo;Michael Prosser

  • Research on networked learning: An overview

    Peter Goodyear;Sheena Banks;Vivien Hodgson;David McConnell

  • In medias res: reframing design for learning

    Peter Goodyear;Yannis Dimitriadis

  • Patterns, designs and activities: unifying descriptions of learning structures

    Patrick McAndrew;Peter Goodyear;James Dalziel

  • Learning through face‐to‐face and online discussions: Associations between students' conceptions, approaches and academic performance in political science

    Ana-Maria Bliuc;Robert A. Ellis;Peter Goodyear;Leanne Piggott

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert A. Ellis
Robert A. Ellis Griffith University
Yannis Dimitriadis
Yannis Dimitriadis University of Valladolid
Michael Prosser
Michael Prosser University of Melbourne
Maarten de Laat
Maarten de Laat University of South Australia
Rafael A. Calvo
Rafael A. Calvo Imperial College London
David McConnell
David McConnell University of Alberta
J. Michael Spector
J. Michael Spector University of North Texas
Lori Lockyer
Lori Lockyer Queensland University of Technology
Demetrios G. Sampson
Demetrios G. Sampson University of Piraeus
Ulrike Cress
Ulrike Cress Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens diverse career opportunities in areas such as social work, mental health, and therapy. Many students pursue flexible study options to balance work and family commitments. Accelerated MSW programs allow learners to earn their Master of Social Work faster, preparing them for frontline roles in community organizations and healthcare.

For those with an interest in human behavior, an online accelerated psychology degree can provide a swift pathway to careers in counseling, research, or organizational psychology. If you're considering licensed counseling, choose a program that meets industry standards. For example, CACREP online counseling programs are accredited and recognized, improving your prospects for licensure and employment.

Those who wish to help families and couples can specialize through marriage and family masters programs available online. These degrees offer practical training for high-demand fields, making it easier than ever to start or advance your career in social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Goodyear

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles