World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Henrik Jacobsen Kleven

Henrik Jacobsen Kleven

D-Index & Metrics

Economics and Finance

D-Index
47
Citations
13691
World Ranking
1562
National Ranking
939

Henrik Jacobsen Kleven publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henrik Jacobsen Kleven sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 1 scientists 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42 publications 521+

This scientist: 117 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

Henrik Jacobsen Kleven D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henrik Jacobsen Kleven sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

Overview

Henrik Jacobsen Kleven is affiliated with Princeton University in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines within the social sciences, focusing notably on topics related to gender, labor, family dynamics, and fiscal policy.

Their recent papers include the following:

  • Taxation and Migration: Evidence and Policy Implications (2020), published in The Journal of Economic Perspectives
  • Does Biology Drive Child Penalties? Evidence from Biological and Adoptive Families (2021), published in American Economic Review Insights
  • Technology and Big Data Are Changing Economics: Mining Text to Track Methods (2020), published in AEA Papers and Proceedings
  • Sufficient Statistics Revisited (2021), published in Annual Review of Economics
  • The Welfare Magnet Hypothesis: Evidence from an Immigrant Welfare Scheme in Denmark (2020), published in American Economic Review Insights

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Henrik Jacobsen Kleven include Camille Landais, Jakob Egholt Søgaard, Johanna Posch, Andreas Steinhauer, and Josef Zweimüller. Collaborations with these researchers reflect a range of joint contributions to economic and social science literature.

Henrik Jacobsen Kleven's work has appeared frequently in several publication venues, including:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • American Economic Review Insights
  • American Economic Journal Economic Policy
  • The Journal of Economic Perspectives
  • AEA Papers and Proceedings

Their primary field of study is Social Sciences, with notable concentrations in subfields such as Gender Studies, Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, and Education.

The main topics that characterize their research include:

  • Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
  • Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
  • Migration and Labor Dynamics
  • Social Policy and Reform Studies
  • Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
  • Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis

This combination of research themes and collaborative efforts positions Henrik Jacobsen Kleven within key debates in economics and social sciences, particularly those related to labor markets, migration, family policy, and gender dynamics.

Best Publications

  • Unwilling or Unable to Cheat? Evidence From a Tax Audit Experiment in Denmark

    Henrik Jacobsen Kleven;Martin B. Knudsen;Claus Thustrup Kreiner;Søren Pedersen

  • Children and Gender Inequality: Evidence from Denmark

    Henrik Kleven;Camille Landais;Jakob Egholt Søgaard

  • Using Notches to Uncover Optimization Frictions and Structural Elasticities: Theory and Evidence from Pakistan*

    Henrik J. Kleven;Mazhar Waseem

  • Child Penalties Across Countries: Evidence and Explanations

    Henrik Kleven;Camille Landais;Johanna Posch;Andreas Steinhauer

  • Taxation and International Migration of Superstars: Evidence from the European Football Market †

    Henrik Jacobsen Kleven;Camille Landais;Emmanuel Saez

  • Extrinsic and intrinsic motivations for tax compliance: evidence from a field experiment in Germany

    Nadja Dwenger;Henrik Kleven;Imran Rasul;Johannes Rincke

  • Welfare reform in European countries: a microsimulation analysis*

    Herwig Immervoll;Henrik Jacobsen Kleven;Claus Thustrup Kreiner;Emmanuel Saez

  • Bunching ∗

    Unknown

  • Why Can Modern Governments Tax So Much? An Agency Model of Firms as Fiscal Intermediaries

    Henrik Jacobsen Kleven;Claus Thustrup Kreiner;Emmanuel Saez

  • Migration and Wage Effects of Taxing Top Earners: Evidence from the Foreigners’ Tax Scheme in Denmark

    Henrik Jacobsen Kleven;Camille Landais;Emmanuel Saez;Esben Anton Schultz

  • Estimating Taxable Income Responses using Danish Tax Reforms

    Henrik Jacobsen Kleven;Esben Anton Schultz

  • Production versus Revenue Efficiency with Limited Tax Capacity: Theory and Evidence from Pakistan

    Michael Carlos Best;Anne Brockmeyer;Henrik Jacobsen Kleven;Johannes Spinnewijn

  • Extrinsic and intrinsic motivations for tax compliance: evidence from a field experiment in Germany

    Nadja Dwenger;Henrik Kleven;Imran Rasul;Johannes Rincke

  • Housing Market Responses to Transaction Taxes: Evidence From Notches and Stimulus in the UK

    Michael Carlos;Henrik Jacobsen Kleven

  • Transfer Program Complexity and the Take-Up of Social Benefits

    Henrik Jacobsen Kleven;Wojciech Kopczuk

  • The Optimal Income Taxation of Couples

    Henrik Jacobsen Kleven;Claus Thustrup Kreiner;Emmanuel Saez

  • Wealth Taxation and Wealth Accumulation: Theory and Evidence From Denmark

    Katrine Jakobsen;Kristian Jakobsen;Henrik Kleven;Gabriel Zucman

  • The Marginal Cost of Public Funds: Hours of Work versus Labor Force Participation

    Henrik Kleven;Claus Thustrup Kreiner

  • The marginal cost of public funds: Hours of work versus labor force participation

    Henrik Jacobsen Kleven;Claus Thustrup Kreiner

  • Evaluation of four tax reforms in the United States: labor supply and welfare effects for single mothers

    Nada Eissa;Henrik Jacobsen Kleven;Henrik Jacobsen Kleven;Claus Thustrup Kreiner

  • Taxation and Migration: Evidence and Policy Implications

    Henrik Kleven;Camille Landais;Mathilde Muñoz;Stefanie Stantcheva

  • Children and Gender Inequality: Evidence from Denmark

    Henrik Kleven;Camille Landais;Jakob Egholt Søgaard

  • How can Scandinavians tax so much

    Henrik Jacobsen Kleven

  • Do Family Policies Reduce Gender Inequality? Evidence from 60 Years of Policy Experimentation

    Henrik Kleven;Camille Landais;Johanna Posch;Andreas Steinhauer

  • Do Family Policies Reduce Gender Inequality? Evidence from 60 Years of Policy Experimentation

    Henrik Kleven;Camille Landais;Johanna Posch;Andreas Steinhauer

Frequent Co-Authors

Emmanuel Saez
Emmanuel Saez University of California, Berkeley
Josef Zweimüller
Josef Zweimüller University of Zurich
Wojciech Kopczuk
Wojciech Kopczuk Columbia University
Imran Rasul
Imran Rasul University College London
Janet Currie
Janet Currie Princeton University
Peter Birch Sørensen
Peter Birch Sørensen University of Copenhagen
Joel Slemrod
Joel Slemrod University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Oriana Bandiera
Oriana Bandiera London School of Economics and Political Science

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in business-related fields can open doors to a wide range of career opportunities for students of Economics and Finance. Today, many reputable universities in the USA offer flexible online learning options designed to fit your schedule and advance your career.

For those interested in launching their own business or managing startups, an mba entrepreneurship degree develops strategic thinking and leadership skills. If you enjoy overseeing complex projects and coordinating teams, you may want to consider whether is project management a good degree for your goals, as this field continues to see strong demand across industries.

Students aiming to deepen their financial expertise can pursue a bachelor's in finance online, which provides a solid foundation for roles in banking, investing, and corporate finance. Additionally, professionals seeking to fast-track their business education can explore the top accelerated mba programs to quickly enhance their credentials and marketability.

These online pathways make it easier than ever to boost your qualifications and pursue rewarding economics and finance careers in a competitive job market.

Best Scientists Citing Henrik Jacobsen Kleven

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles