World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Marcel V. J. Veenman

Marcel V. J. Veenman

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
33
Citations
8911
World Ranking
10351
National Ranking
459

Marcel V. J. Veenman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcel V. J. Veenman sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 69 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Marcel V. J. Veenman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcel V. J. Veenman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marcel V. J. Veenman is affiliated with Leiden University in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of psychology and social sciences, with a particular emphasis on developmental and educational psychology as well as education.

Veenman's work covers several main topics, including:

  • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Online and Blended Learning
  • Educational Strategies and Epistemologies

Their recent publications are concentrated in scholarly journals related to educational psychology. Notably, they have contributed to the "Educational Psychology Review," where they have published research on self-regulated learning and instructional strategies.

One example of their recent work is the 2020 paper titled The Role of Direct Strategy Instruction and Indirect Activation of Self-Regulated Learning-Evidence from Classroom Observation Studies, published in Educational Psychology Review. This paper explores mechanisms of strategy instruction to support learner self-regulation, based on classroom observations.

Collaborations feature prominently in Veenman's research approach. A frequent co-author is Charlotte Dignath, with whom Veenman has jointly worked on studies related to educational psychology.

Veenman's scholarly activity has been published mainly in the venue:

  • Educational Psychology Review

Their expertise lies at the intersection of psychology and education, addressing theoretical and practical aspects of learning strategies, teaching innovation, and technology-enhanced education environments.

Best Publications

  • Metacognition and learning: conceptual and methodological considerations

    Marcel V. J. Veenman;Marcel V. J. Veenman;Bernadette H. A. M. Van Hout-Wolters;Peter Afflerbach

  • The relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills from a developmental perspective

    Marcel V.J. Veenman;Pascal Wilhelm;Jos J. Beishuizen

  • Relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills: Age and task differences

    Marcel V.J. Veenman;Marcel V.J. Veenman;Marleen A. Spaans

  • The relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills in early adolescence.

    Marcel V. J. Veenman;Rosalie Kok;Anke W. Blöte

  • Alternative assessment of strategy use with self-report instruments: a discussion

    Marcel V. J. Veenman

  • The Role of Direct Strategy Instruction and Indirect Activation of Self-Regulated Learning—Evidence from Classroom Observation Studies

    Unknown

  • Learning styles: Self‐reports versus thinking‐aloud measures

    Marcel V. J. Veenman;Frans J. Prins;Joke Verheij

  • Metacognitive activities in text-studying and problem-solving: Development of a taxonomy

    Joost Meijer;Marcel V. J. Veenman;Bernadette H. A. M. van Hout-Wolters

  • The assessment of metacognitive skills: what can be learned from multi-method designs?

    M.V.J. Veenman

  • The generality vs domain-specificity of metacognitive skills in novice learning across domains.

    Marcel V.J. Veenman;Jan J. Elshout;Joost Meijer

  • LEARNING TO SELF-MONITOR AND SELF-REGULATE

    Marcel V. J. Veenman

  • Intellectual and metacognitive skills of novices while studying texts under conditions of text difficulty and time constraint

    Marcel V.J. Veenman;Marcel V.J. Veenman;Jos J. Beishuizen

  • Changes in the relation between cognitive and metacognitive skills during the acquisition of expertise

    Marcel Veenman;Jan J. Elshout

  • The impact of intellectual ability and metacognition on learning: New support for the threshold of problematicity theory

    Frans J. Prins;Frans J. Prins;Marcel V.J. Veenman;Marcel V.J. Veenman;Jan J. Elshout

  • Development of metacognitive skillfulness: A longitudinal study

    Manita van der Stel;Marcel V.J. Veenman

  • Metacognitive skills and intellectual ability of young adolescents: a longitudinal study from a developmental perspective

    Manita van der Stel;Marcel V. J. Veenman

  • Initial inductive learning in a complex computer simulated environment: the role of metacognitive skills and intellectual ability

    M.V.J Veenman;F.J Prins;F.J Prins;J.J Elshout

  • Metacognitive mediation in learning with computer-based simulations

    Marcel V.J. Veenman;Jan J. Elshout;Vittorio V. Busato

  • Relation between intellectual ability and metacognitive skillfulness as predictors of learning performance of young students performing tasks in different domains

    Manita van der Stel;Marcel V.J. Veenman

  • Metacognition in Science Education: Defi nitions, Constituents, and Their Intricate Relation with Cognition

    Marcel V. J. Veenman

  • Technical students' metacognitive skills: relating general vs. specific metacognitive skills to study success

    Marcel V.J. Veenman;Joke Verheij

Frequent Co-Authors

Frans J. Prins
Frans J. Prins Utrecht University
Janet G. van Hell
Janet G. van Hell Pennsylvania State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens up diverse career pathways, from counseling and clinical roles to research and organizational psychology. As interest in mental health and behavioral sciences grows, accredited online programs have become more accessible and flexible for students across the USA.

Choosing the right program is crucial. Factors such as accreditation, faculty expertise, specialization options, and networking opportunities should guide your decision. For example, you can compare the best psychology degree programs ranking in New York City with the top psychology degrees in Newark to understand how options differ between urban hubs.

Students interested in more regional options can review top psychology programs in New Hampshire or explore the top psychology programs in Orange for opportunities in California.

Graduates can pursue licensure as counselors, specialize in mental health support, or work in business, education, or healthcare. With the growth of online learning, these pathways are more flexible, making it easier to balance work, study, and life commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Marcel V. J. Veenman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles