World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 43 7207 6720 3904 3548 154 8677

Janet G. van Hell publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Janet G. van Hell between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Janet G. van Hell published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 5.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2020. 18 of the 175 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2020. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 1 publication 2008: 6 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 11 publications
1993 2025

175 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Janet G. van Hell: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 0
1995 0
1996 2
1997 1
1998 2
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 6
2003 3
2004 0
2005 2
2006 1
2007 1
2008 6
2009 12
2010 7
2011 4
2012 12
2013 3
2014 11
2015 10
2016 9
2017 9
2018 4
2019 12
2020 16
2021 14
2022 4
2023 5
2024 7
2025 11
Total 175
Download as CSV

Janet G. van Hell publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janet G. van Hell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 154 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576 154
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Janet G. van Hell D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janet G. van Hell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 43
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Janet G. van Hell is affiliated with Pennsylvania State University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and neuroscience, with a significant focus on cognitive neuroscience, developmental and educational psychology, and experimental and cognitive psychology. Their work also intersects with language and linguistics, as well as linguistics and language as subfields.

The scientist has contributed extensively to topics related to the neurobiology of language and bilingualism, reading and literacy development, phonetics and phonology research, language development and disorders, creativity in education and neuroscience, linguistic variation and morphology, and language, metaphor, and cognition.

Frequent co-authors with whom they have collaborated include Roger E. Beaty, Rafał Jończyk, John Patterson, Dan R. Johnson, and Mathias Benedek.

Janet G. van Hell has published regularly in several academic venues, including:

  • Language Learning
  • Bilingualism Language and Cognition
  • Neuropsychologia
  • Brain and Language
  • Journal of Neurolinguistics

Their recent papers encompass a range of studies in language learning, bilingualism, and cognitive processing:

  • Learning Novel Word Meanings: An ERP Study on Lexical Consolidation in Monolingual, Inexperienced Foreign Language Learners (2020, Language Learning)
  • Multilingual semantic distance: Automatic verbal creativity assessment in many languages (2023, Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts)
  • Interactive Alignment and Lexical Triggering of Code-Switching in Bilingual Dialogue (2020, Frontiers in Psychology)
  • Bilingualism and Processing Speed in Typically Developing Children and Children With Developmental Language Disorder (2020, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research)
  • Neural signatures of inhibitory control in intra-sentential code-switching: Evidence from fMRI (2020, Journal of Neurolinguistics)

Best Publications

  • Foreign language knowledge can influence native language performance in exclusively native contexts

    Janet G. van Hell;Ton Dijkstra

  • Conceptual representation in bilingual memory: Effects of concreteness and cognate status in word association.

    Janet G. Van Hell;Annette M. B. De Groot

  • The Revised Hierarchical Model: A critical review and assessment

    Judith F. Kroll;Janet G. Van Hell;Natasha Tokowicz;David W. Green

  • Executive functions and inhibitory control in multilingual children: Evidence from second-language learners, bilinguals, and trilinguals

    Gregory J. Poarch;Janet G. van Hell;Janet G. van Hell

  • ERPs reveal individual differences in morphosyntactic processing.

    Darren Tanner;Janet G. Van Hell;Janet G. Van Hell

  • Keyword Mnemonics Versus Rote Rehearsal: Learning Concrete and Abstract Foreign Words by Experienced and Inexperienced Learners

    Janet G. van Hell;Andrea Candia Mahn

  • Sentence context modulates visual word recognition and translation in bilinguals

    Janet G. van Hell;Annette M.B. de Groot

  • Second Language Proficiency and Cross-Language Lexical Activation

    Janet G. van Hell;Darren Tanner

  • Event-related brain potentials and second language learning: syntactic processing in late L2 learners at different L2 proficiency levels

    Janet G. van Hell;Natasha Tokowicz

  • Cross-language activation in children’s speech production: Evidence from second language learners, bilinguals, and trilinguals

    Gregory J. Poarch;Janet G. van Hell;Janet G. van Hell

  • DISENTANGLING CONTEXT AVAILABILITY AND CONCRETENESS IN LEXICAL DECISION AND WORD TRANSLATION

    Janet G. van Hell;Annette M. B. de Groot

  • Syntactic alignment and shared word order in code-switched sentence production: Evidence from bilingual monologue and dialogue

    Gerrit Jan Kootstra;Janet G. van Hell;Janet G. van Hell;Ton Dijkstra

  • Number-of-translation norms for Dutch-English translation pairs: a new tool for examining language production.

    Natasha Tokowicz;Judith F. Kroll;Annette M. B. de Groot;Janet G. van Hell

  • Word recognition in child second language learners: Evidence from cognates and false friends.

    Pascal Brenders;Janet G. van Hell;Janet G. van Hell;Ton Dijkstra

  • Testing the Language Mode Hypothesis Using Trilinguals

    Ton Dijkstra;Janet G. van Hell

  • Priming of code-switches in sentences: The role of lexical repetition, cognates, and language proficiency

    Gerrit Jan Kootstra;Janet G. Van Hell;Ton Dijkstra

  • Tracking lexical consolidation with ERPs: Lexical and semantic-priming effects on N400 and LPC responses to newly-learned words

    Iske Bakker;Atsuko Takashima;Atsuko Takashima;Janet G. van Hell;Janet G. van Hell;Gabriele Janzen

  • Clause packaging in writing and speech: A cross-linguistic developmental analysis

    Ludo Verhoeven;Melina Aparici;Dalia Cahana-Amitay;Janet G. van Hell

  • Richness of information about novel words influences how episodic and semantic memory networks interact during lexicalization

    Atsuko Takashima;Iske Bakker;Janet G. van Hell;Janet G. van Hell;Gabriele Janzen

  • Cognitive Control Ability Mediates Prediction Costs in Monolinguals and Bilinguals

    Megan Zirnstein;Janet G. van Hell;Judith F. Kroll;Judith F. Kroll

  • Conceptual representation in bilingual memory: Effects of concreteness and cognate status in word association

    J.G. Hell;A.M.B. de Groot

Frequent Co-Authors

James M. McQueen
James M. McQueen Radboud University
Ton Dijkstra
Ton Dijkstra Radboud University
Judith F. Kroll
Judith F. Kroll University of California, Irvine
Ludo Verhoeven
Ludo Verhoeven Radboud University
Annette M. B. de Groot
Annette M. B. de Groot University of Amsterdam
Ton de Jong
Ton de Jong University of Twente
Jelle Jolles
Jelle Jolles Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Tamara van Gog
Tamara van Gog Utrecht University
Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer
Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer Maastricht University
Laurie Beth Feldman
Laurie Beth Feldman University at Albany, State University of New York

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens up a wide range of career pathways, with social work being a particularly rewarding option. Many states have unique requirements for becoming a social worker. For example, before you can practice, you must meet specific Virginia social work license requirements. These often include obtaining an accredited degree, earning supervised experience, and passing state-specific exams.

Similarly, if you are considering becoming a social worker in Washington, you will need to understand its licensing process, which may involve additional coursework and continued professional development. In West Virginia, the journey to how to become a social worker in West Virginia also focuses on accredited educational programs and passing the appropriate licensure exam.

For those planning to work in the Midwest, the Wisconsin social work education requirements highlight the importance of selecting a program that meets state standards. Choosing an online psychology or social work degree that aligns with your state’s requirements will ensure a smoother certification process and help launch a fulfilling career.

Best Scientists Citing Janet G. van Hell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles