World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
43
Citations
8602
World Ranking
7211
National Ranking
3906

Laurie Beth Feldman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laurie Beth Feldman sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 114 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Laurie Beth Feldman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laurie Beth Feldman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Laurie Beth Feldman is a researcher affiliated with the University at Albany, State University of New York in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplinary fields, primarily focusing on Computer Science, Psychology, and Social Sciences. Within these broad domains, their work includes notable subfields such as Human-Computer Interaction, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Communication.

The scientist has contributed to a range of topics related to language and communication, including Digital Communication and Language, Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism, Reading and Literacy Development, Language, Metaphor, and Cognition, Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining, Social Media and Politics, and Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence.

Their publication record features papers in various peer-reviewed venues such as Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, Visual Cognition, Heliyon, Bilingualism Language and Cognition, and Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Some of their recent works include:

  • Insights into codeswitching from online communication: Effects of language preference and conditions arising from vocabulary richness (2021), published in Bilingualism Language and Cognition
  • Emoji use validates the potential for meaning standardization among ideographic symbols (2023), published in Behavioral and Brain Sciences

Other relevant papers connected to their research interests, although authored primarily by their frequent collaborators, include:

  • Are emojis processed like words?: Eye movements reveal the time course of semantic processing for emojified text (2021), Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • Emojis elicit semantic parafoveal-on-foveal (PoF) effects during reading (2024), Visual Cognition
  • The dynamics of negative stereotypes as revealed by tweeting behavior in the aftermath of the Charlie Hebdo terrorist attack (2020), Heliyon

Laurie Beth Feldman collaborates regularly with a number of researchers, including Eliza Barach, Vidhushini Srinivasan, Samira Shaikh, Heather Sheridan, and Andriana L. Christofalos.

Best Publications

  • Lexical and conceptual representation in beginning and proficient bilinguals

    Mary C. Potter;Kwok-Fai So;Barbara Von Eckardt;Laurie B. Feldman

  • Morphological aspects of language processing.

    Laurie Beth Feldman

  • Relations among regular and irregular morphologically related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming.

    Carol A. Fowler;Carol A. Fowler;Shirley E. Napps;Laurie Feldman

  • Morphological influences on the recognition of monosyllabic monomorphemic words

    R.H. Baayen;L.B. Feldman;R. Schreuder

  • Relation between pronunciation and recognition of printed words in deep and shallow orthographies.

    Leonard Katz;Laurie B. Feldman

  • The contribution of morphological and semantic relatedness to repetition priming at short and long lags: Evidence from hebrew

    Shlomo Bentin;Laurie B. Feldman

  • Early morphological processing is morphosemantic and not simply morpho-orthographic: A violation of form-then-meaning accounts of word recognition

    Laurie Beth Feldman;Patrick A. O’Connor;Fermín Moscoso del Prado Martín

  • Semantic radicals contribute to the visual identification of Chinese characters

    Laurie Beth Feldman;Witina W.T. Siok

  • Are morphological effects distinguishable from the effects of shared meaning and shared form

    Laurie Beth Feldman

  • Discrimination in lexical decision

    Petar Milin;Laurie Beth Feldman;Michael Ramscar;Peter Hendrix

  • Morphological priming : The role of prime duration, semantic transparency, and affix position

    Laurie Beth Feldman;Laurie Beth Feldman;Emily G. Soltano;Emily G. Soltano

  • The role of component function in visual recognition of Chinese characters.

    Laurie B. Feldman;Witina W. T. Siok

  • Word recognition in Serbo-Croatian is phonologically analytic.

    Laurie B. Feldman;M. T. Turvey

  • The processing and representation of Dutch and English compounds: Peripheral morphological and central orthographic effects

    Nivja H. De Jong;Laurie B. Feldman;Laurie B. Feldman;Robert Schreuder;Matthew Pastizzo;Matthew Pastizzo

  • Morphological facilitation for regular and irregular verb formations in native and non-native speakers: Little evidence for two distinct mechanisms

    Laurie Beth Feldman;Aleksandar Kostić;Dana M. Basnight-Brown;Dušica Filipović Đurđević

  • Monolingual and Bilingual Recognition of Regular and Irregular English Verbs: Sensitivity to Form Similarity Varies with First Language Experience.

    Dana M. Basnight-Brown;Lang Chen;Shu Hua;Aleksandar Kostić;Aleksandar Kostić

  • Semantic radicals in phonetic compounds: Implications for visual character recognition in Chinese.

    Laurie B. Feldman;Witina W. T. Siok

  • What do graded effects of semantic transparency reveal about morphological processing

    Laurie Beth Feldman;Laurie Beth Feldman;Emily G Soltano;Matthew J Pastizzo;Matthew J Pastizzo;Sarah E Francis

  • Grammatical priming of inflected nouns

    G. Lukatela;A. Kostić;A. Kostić;Laurie B. Feldman;M. T. Turvey;M. T. Turvey

  • Decomposing words into their constituent morphemes: evidence from English and Hebrew.

    Laurie Beth Feldman;Ram Frost;Tamar Pnini

  • Models of Lexical Access and Morphological Processing

    Petar Milin;Eva Smolka;Laurie Beth Feldman

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael T. Turvey
Michael T. Turvey University of Connecticut
Judith F. Kroll
Judith F. Kroll University of California, Irvine
Ting Liu
Ting Liu Harbin Institute of Technology
Leonard Katz
Leonard Katz Haskins Laboratories
R. Harald Baayen
R. Harald Baayen University of Tübingen
Janet G. van Hell
Janet G. van Hell Pennsylvania State University
Vicki L. Hanson
Vicki L. Hanson Association for Computing Machinery
Suparna Rajaram
Suparna Rajaram Stony Brook University
Rick Dale
Rick Dale University of California, Los Angeles
Ram Frost
Ram Frost Hebrew University of Jerusalem

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees can unlock a diverse range of career opportunities. Many students pursue specialized paths such as child psychology careers, focusing on supporting children's mental health, development, and wellbeing.

If you're curious about how the human mind functions, cognitive psychology careers are a popular choice. This field investigates thought processes, memory, learning, and problem-solving, with openings in research, tech, healthcare, and education.

For those passionate about helping others manage life's challenges, counseling psychology careers can lead to work in schools, private practice, or clinical settings. Professionals in this area use therapeutic approaches to address a wide range of emotional and behavioral issues.

Lastly, many consider becoming a therapist or counselor, which often starts with an online degree. These roles offer flexibility and the chance to specialize in areas such as marriage and family counseling, substance abuse, or trauma therapy.

Online psychology programs in the USA provide flexible pathways to begin or advance in these rewarding professions.

Best Scientists Citing Laurie Beth Feldman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles