World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 50 5366 4981 2935 2661 200 13040

Rick Dale publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rick Dale between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rick Dale published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 10.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 29 publications in 2013. 22 of the 245 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 29. Peak 29 publications in 2013. 2002: 2 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 29 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 13 publications
2002 2025

245 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rick Dale: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 2
2003 3
2004 3
2005 5
2006 5
2007 9
2008 9
2009 11
2010 10
2011 17
2012 11
2013 29
2014 19
2015 19
2016 17
2017 13
2018 12
2019 6
2020 5
2021 7
2022 4
2023 7
2024 9
2025 13
Total 245
Download as CSV

Rick Dale publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rick Dale sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 191–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 200 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343 200
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Rick Dale D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rick Dale sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445 50
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Rick Dale is affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles in the United States. Their research spans the fields of psychology and computer science, with a particular focus on artificial intelligence, cognitive neuroscience, social psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, and cultural studies.

Their work covers a broad range of topics including language and cultural evolution, action observation and synchronization, opinion dynamics and social influence, embodied and extended cognition, mental health research topics, philosophy and history of science, and complex systems and time series analysis.

Rick Dale has contributed to several recent papers, among which are:

  • Using mouse cursor tracking to investigate online cognition: Preserving methodological ingenuity while moving toward reproducible science, 2020, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • Body synchrony in triadic interaction, 2020, Royal Society Open Science
  • Unidimensional and Multidimensional Methods for Recurrence Quantification Analysis with crqa, 2021, The R Journal
  • Quantifying Interdisciplinarity in Cognitive Science and Beyond, 2022, Topics in Cognitive Science
  • Multimodal Coordination of Sound and Movement in Music and Speech, 2020, Discourse Processes

Their frequent co-authors include Gregory A. Bryant, Christopher T. Kello, Alexia Galati, Yanru Jiang, and Pablo Contreras Kallens.

Rick Dale has published regularly in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), Frontiers in Psychology, Cognitive Science, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), and Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

Best Publications

  • Language Structure Is Partly Determined by Social Structure

    Gary Lupyan;Rick Dale

  • Looking to understand: the coupling between speakers' and listeners' eye movements and its relationship to discourse comprehension.

    Daniel C. Richardson;Rick Dale

  • The Art of Conversation Is Coordination Common Ground and the Coupling of Eye Movements During Dialogue

    Daniel C. Richardson;Rick Dale;Natasha Z. Kirkham

  • Hand in motion reveals mind in motion.

    Jonathan B. Freeman;Rick Dale;Thomas A. Farmer

  • Behavior matching in multimodal communication is synchronized.

    Max M. Louwerse;Rick Dale;Ellen Gurman Bard;Patrick Jeuniaux

  • Conversation and Coordinative Structures

    Kevin D. Shockley;Daniel C. Richardson;Rick Dale

  • Graded motor responses in the time course of categorizing atypical exemplars

    Rick Dale;Caitlin Kehoe;Michael J. Spivey

  • Cross-recurrence quantification analysis of categorical and continuous time series: an R package

    Moreno I. Coco;Rick Dale

  • Action Dynamics Reveal Parallel Competition in Decision Making

    Chris McKinstry;Rick Dale;Michael J. Spivey

  • The self organization of human interaction

    Rick Dale;Riccardo Fusaroli;Riccardo Fusaroli;Nicholas D. Duran;Nicholas D. Duran;Daniel C. Richardson

  • Continuous Dynamics in Real-Time Cognition

    Michael J. Spivey;Rick Dale

  • Assessing Bimodality to Detect the Presence of a Dual Cognitive Process

    Jonathan B. Freeman;Rick Dale

  • Good things peak in pairs: a note on the bimodality coefficient.

    Roland Pfister;Katharina A. Schwarz;Markus Janczyk;Rick Dale

  • Complexity matching in dyadic conversation.

    Drew H. Abney;Alexandra Paxton;Rick Dale;Christopher T. Kello

  • Argument disrupts interpersonal synchrony

    Alexandra Paxton;Rick Dale

  • Unraveling the Dyad: Using Recurrence Analysis to Explore Patterns of Syntactic Coordination Between Children and Caregivers in Conversation

    Rick Dale;Michael J. Spivey

  • The Cognitive Dynamics of Negated Sentence Verification

    Rick Dale;Nicholas D. Duran

  • Frame-differencing methods for measuring bodily synchrony in conversation.

    Alexandra Paxton;Rick Dale

  • The action dynamics of overcoming the truth.

    Nicholas D. Duran;Rick Dale;Danielle S. McNamara

  • UNDERSTANDING THE ORIGINS OF MORPHOLOGICAL DIVERSITY: THE LINGUISTIC NICHE HYPOTHESIS

    Rick Dale;Gary Lupyan

  • Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society

    Rick Dale;Chen Yu;Yukie Nagai;Moreno Coco

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael J. Spivey
Michael J. Spivey University of California, Merced
Daniel C. Richardson
Daniel C. Richardson University College London
Gary Lupyan
Gary Lupyan University of Wisconsin–Madison
D. Kimbrough Oller
D. Kimbrough Oller University of Memphis
Teenie Matlock
Teenie Matlock University of California, Merced
Morten H. Christiansen
Morten H. Christiansen Cornell University
Riccardo Fusaroli
Riccardo Fusaroli Aarhus University
Laurie Beth Feldman
Laurie Beth Feldman University at Albany, State University of New York
Anthony Chemero
Anthony Chemero University of Cincinnati
Frank Keller
Frank Keller University of Edinburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Psychology in the USA opens doors to multiple related online degrees and promising career pathways. A popular option for students is pursuing counseling degrees, which prepare graduates for impactful roles in mental health, education, and community services.

Many students look to regional trends when choosing where to study. For example, the popular counseling programs in Stockton offer a glimpse into strong demand in California’s Central Valley. If you’re considering studying in the South, the most popular counseling degree programs in Texas highlight universities with a commitment to Counseling Psychology.

On a national level, the top-ranked counseling degree programs in USA reveal which institutions offer the best academic standards and career support. Meanwhile, those interested in the Mountain West may want to explore the top-ranked counseling degree programs in Utah—reflecting unique regional opportunities.

By researching these online and campus-based programs, students can tailor their degree choice to their preferred location, career goals, and area of specialization within Psychology and Counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Rick Dale

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles