World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Sarah Brown-Schmidt

Sarah Brown-Schmidt

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
35
Citations
5662
World Ranking
9819
National Ranking
5194

Sarah Brown-Schmidt publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sarah Brown-Schmidt sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 104 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Sarah Brown-Schmidt D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sarah Brown-Schmidt sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sarah Brown-Schmidt is affiliated with Vanderbilt University in the United States. Their research spans the fields of psychology and neuroscience, with a focus on cognitive neuroscience and experimental and cognitive psychology. Additional subfields of study include artificial intelligence, developmental and educational psychology, and language and linguistics.

Brown-Schmidt's work addresses multiple topics, such as:

  • Neurobiology of language and bilingualism
  • Memory processes and influences
  • Speech and dialogue systems
  • Language, discourse, communication strategies
  • Traumatic brain injury research
  • Language, metaphor, and cognition
  • Hearing impairment and communication

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Brown-Schmidt include Melissa C. Duff, Sharice Clough, Sun-Joo Cho, Kaitlin Lord, and Si On Yoon. These collaborations have supported research outputs in various high-impact venues.

Brown-Schmidt has contributed extensively to academic journals, with multiple publications appearing in:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuropsychologia
  • Psychometrika
  • Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
  • Arabixiv (OSF Preprints)

Some of their recent papers include:

  • Long-lasting gradient activation of referents during spoken language processing, 2020, Journal of Memory and Language
  • #foodie: Implications of interacting with social media for memory, 2020, Cognitive Research Principles and Implications
  • Referential context and executive functioning influence children's resolution of syntactic ambiguity, 2020, Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition
  • The Multiple Perspectives Theory of Mental States in Communication, 2023, Cognitive Science
  • Modeling Intensive Polytomous Time-Series Eye-Tracking Data: A Dynamic Tree-Based Item Response Model, 2020, Psychometrika

Best Publications

  • The rapid use of gender information: Evidence of the time course of pronoun resolution from eyetracking

    Jennifer E. Arnold;Janet G. Eisenband;Sarah Brown-Schmidt;John C. Trueswell

  • The role of executive function in perspective taking during online language comprehension

    Sarah Brown-Schmidt

  • The hippocampus and the flexible use and processing of language

    Melissa C Duff;Sarah Brown-Schmidt

  • Addressees distinguish shared from private information when interpreting questions during interactive conversation

    Sarah Brown-Schmidt;Christine Gunlogson;Michael K. Tanenhaus

  • Real-Time Investigation of Referential Domains in Unscripted Conversation: A Targeted Language Game Approach

    Sarah Brown-Schmidt;Michael K. Tanenhaus

  • Partner-specific interpretation of maintained referential precedents during interactive dialog

    Sarah Brown-Schmidt

  • Watching the eyes when talking about size: An investigation of message formulation and utterance planning

    Sarah Brown-Schmidt;Michael K. Tanenhaus

  • Talker-specific perceptual adaptation during online speech perception

    Alison M. Trude;Sarah Brown-Schmidt

  • Children's use of gender and order-of-mention during pronoun comprehension

    Jennifer E. Arnold;Sarah Brown-Schmidt;John Trueswell

  • One frog, two frog, red frog, blue frog: Factors affecting children's syntactic choices in production and comprehension

    Felicia Hurewitz;Sarah Brown-Schmidt;Kirsten Thorpe;Lila R. Gleitman

  • Beyond salience: Interpretation of personal and demonstrative pronouns

    Sarah Brown-Schmidt;Donna K. Byron;Michael K. Tanenhaus

  • Beyond common and privileged: Gradient representations of common ground in real-time language use

    Sarah Brown-Schmidt

  • Ways of looking ahead: Hierarchical planning in language production

    Eun Kyung Lee;Sarah Brown-Schmidt;Duane G. Watson

  • Talking in Another Person's Shoes: Incremental Perspective-taking in Language Processing

    Sarah Brown-Schmidt;Joy E. Hanna

  • Influence of perspective and goals on reference production in conversation

    Si On Yoon;Sungryong Koh;Sarah Brown-Schmidt

  • Little houses and casas pequeñas: message formulation and syntactic form in unscripted speech with speakers of English and Spanish.

    Sarah Brown-Schmidt;Agnieszka Ewa Konopka

  • Language processing in the natural world.

    Michael K. Tanenhaus;Sarah Brown-Schmidt

  • Carpet or Cárcel: The effect of age of acquisition and language mode on bilingual lexical access

    Enriqueta Canseco-Gonzalez;Laurel Brehm;Cameron A. Brick;Sarah Brown-Schmidt

  • The Necessity of the Hippocampus for Statistical Learning

    Natalie V. Covington;Sarah Brown-Schmidt;Melissa C. Duff

  • Perspective-Taking in Comprehension, Production, and Memory: An Individual Differences Approach

    Rachel A. Ryskin;Aaron S. Benjamin;Jonathan Tullis;Sarah Brown-Schmidt

  • People as contexts in conversation

    Sarah Brown-Schmidt;Si On Yoon;Rachel Anna Ryskin

  • Talking in another person's shoes: Incremental perspective-taking in language

    Sarah Brown-Schmidt;Zeynep Ilkin;Patrick Sturt;Shravan Vasishth

Frequent Co-Authors

Melissa C. Duff
Melissa C. Duff Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Michael K. Tanenhaus
Michael K. Tanenhaus University of Rochester
Aaron S. Benjamin
Aaron S. Benjamin University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Paul De Boeck
Paul De Boeck The Ohio State University
John C. Trueswell
John C. Trueswell University of Pennsylvania
Cynthia Fisher
Cynthia Fisher University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Michael A. Sayette
Michael A. Sayette University of Pittsburgh
Shravan Vasishth
Shravan Vasishth University of Potsdam
Lila R. Gleitman
Lila R. Gleitman University of Pennsylvania
Randi C. Martin
Randi C. Martin Rice University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens up a diverse range of online programs and professional opportunities. For many graduates, becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) is a rewarding pathway, especially for those interested in behavior analysis and supporting individuals with developmental challenges.

The process for bcba certification requirements in San Francisco involves earning a relevant graduate degree, completing supervised fieldwork, and passing the national BCBA examination. Aspiring professionals in California can also explore the steps for becoming a bcba in San Jose to understand region-specific requirements.

Additionally, guidelines for how to become a bcba in Santa Ana and bcba certification requirements in Scottsdale provide insights into local expectations, including coursework and licensing procedures. Online psychology degrees often feature flexible coursework that prepares students for specialized roles such as BCBA, counseling, or clinical research.

Exploring these pathways can help you better understand the steps needed for a successful psychology career, whether you choose in-person or online education.

Best Scientists Citing Sarah Brown-Schmidt

Trending Scientists