World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Shravan Vasishth

Shravan Vasishth

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
51
Citations
12413
World Ranking
5164
National Ranking
237

Shravan Vasishth publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shravan Vasishth sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 178 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Shravan Vasishth D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shravan Vasishth sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Shravan Vasishth is affiliated with the University of Potsdam in Germany. Their research spans multiple disciplines, primarily focusing on neuroscience, psychology, and computer science. The scientist's main fields of study include:

  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology
  • Computer Science

Their work also intersects with several subfields such as cognitive neuroscience, developmental and educational psychology, artificial intelligence, language and linguistics, and experimental and cognitive psychology. The key subfields of their research are:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

The main topics that characterize the scientist's research corpus include:

  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Topic Modeling
  • Text Readability and Simplification
  • Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Language Development and Disorders

Shravan Vasishth has contributed frequently to a range of academic journals, with multiple publications in:

  • Journal of Memory and Language
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychological Methods

The scientist's collaboration network includes several frequent coauthors. These scholars have collaborated in their publications multiple times and include:

  • Bruno Nicenboim
  • Dario Paape
  • Felix Engelmann
  • Daniel J. Schad
  • Kate Stone

Among the notable papers authored by Shravan Vasishth are:

  • "What did we learn from forty years of research on semantic interference? A Bayesian meta-analysis" (2020) published in Journal of Memory and Language
  • "Are words pre-activated probabilistically during sentence comprehension? Evidence from new data and a Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis using publicly available data" (2020) published in Neuropsychologia
  • "Workflow techniques for the robust use of bayes factors." (2022) published in Psychological Methods
  • "Does case marking affect agreement attraction in comprehension?" (2020) published in Journal of Memory and Language
  • "How to embrace variation and accept uncertainty in linguistic and psycholinguistic data analysis" (2021) published in Linguistics

The scientist has also contributed to academic book literature, including a publication with Cambridge University Press titled Sentence Comprehension as a Cognitive Process (2021).

Best Publications

  • Balancing Type I Error and Power in Linear Mixed Models

    Hannes Matuschek;Reinhold Kliegl;Shravan Vasishth;Harald R. Baayen

  • An Activation-Based Model of Sentence Processing as Skilled Memory Retrieval

    Richard L. Lewis;Shravan Vasishth

  • Computational principles of working memory in sentence comprehension.

    Richard L. Lewis;Shravan Vasishth;Julie A. Van Dyke

  • How to capitalize on a priori contrasts in linear (mixed) models: A tutorial

    Daniel J. Schad;Shravan Vasishth;Sven Hohenstein;Reinhold Kliegl

  • Parsing costs as predictors of reading difficulty: An evaluation using the Potsdam Sentence Corpus

    Marisa Ferrara Boston;John Hale;Reinhold Kliegl;Umesh Patil

  • Argument-Head Distance and Processing Complexity: Explaining both Locality and Antilocality Effects

    Shravan Vasishth;Richard L. Lewis

  • The cave of shadows: Addressing the human factor with generalized additive mixed models

    Harald Baayen;Shravan Vasishth;Reinhold Kliegl;Douglas Bates

  • Processing Polarity: How the Ungrammatical Intrudes on the Grammatical

    Shravan Vasishth;Sven Brüssow;Richard L Lewis;Heiner Drenhaus

  • Similarity-based interference in sentence comprehension: Literature review and Bayesian meta-analysis

    Lena A. Jäger;Felix Engelmann;Shravan Vasishth;Shravan Vasishth

  • Toward a principled Bayesian workflow in cognitive science.

    Daniel J Schad;Michael Betancourt;Shravan Vasishth

  • Bayesian linear mixed models using Stan: A tutorial for psychologists, linguists, and cognitive scientists

    Tanner Sorensen;Sven Hohenstein;Shravan Vasishth

  • The statistical significance filter leads to overoptimistic expectations of replicability

    Shravan Vasishth;Daniela Mertzen;Lena A. Jäger;Andrew Gelman

  • Short-term forgetting in sentence comprehension: Crosslinguistic evidence from verb-final structures

    Shravan Vasishth;Katja Suckow;Richard L. Lewis;Sabine Kern

  • Processing Chinese Relative Clauses: Evidence for the Subject-Relative Advantage

    Shravan Vasishth;Shravan Vasishth;Zhong Chen;Qiang Li;Gueilan Guo

  • Parallel Processing and Sentence Comprehension Difficulty.

    Marisa Ferrara Boston;John T. Hale;Shravan Vasishth;Reinhold Kliegl

  • What is the scanpath signature of syntactic reanalysis

    Titus von der Malsburg;Shravan Vasishth

  • In search of on-line locality effects in sentence comprehension.

    Brian Bartek;Richard L. Lewis;Shravan Vasishth;Mason R. Smith

  • Focus, Word Order and Intonation in Hindi

    Umesh Patil;Gerrit Kentner;Anja Gollrad;Frank Kuegler

  • The subject-relative advantage in Chinese: Evidence for expectation-based processing

    Lena Jäger;Zhong Chen;Qiang Li;Qiang Li;Chien-Jer Charles Lin

  • Strong expectations cancel locality effects: evidence from Hindi.

    Samar Husain;Shravan Vasishth;Narayanan Srinivasan

  • Bayesian linear mixed models using Stan: A tutorial for psychologists, linguists, and cognitive scientists

    Tanner Sorensen;Shravan Vasishth

  • Scanpaths reveal syntactic underspecification and reanalysis strategies

    Titus von der Malsburg;Shravan Vasishth

  • Interference patterns in subject-verb agreement and reflexives revisited: A large-sample study

    Lena A. Jäger;Daniela Mertzen;Julie A. Van Dyke;Shravan Vasishth

  • Topics in Cognitive Science

    Wayne D. Gray;John Hale;David Reitter;Jennifer Culbertson

Frequent Co-Authors

Reinhold Kliegl
Reinhold Kliegl University of Potsdam
Richard L. Lewis
Richard L. Lewis University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Douglas M. Bates
Douglas M. Bates University of Wisconsin–Madison
Andrew Gelman
Andrew Gelman Columbia University
R. Harald Baayen
R. Harald Baayen University of Tübingen
Narayanan Srinivasan
Narayanan Srinivasan Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
David Caplan
David Caplan Harvard University
Frank Rösler
Frank Rösler Universität Hamburg
Mariano Sigman
Mariano Sigman Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
Patrick Sturt
Patrick Sturt University of Edinburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Psychology opens up a variety of rewarding career pathways. Many students pursue roles such as counselors, behavioral analysts, and marriage and family therapists. Each state and city may have unique educational and certification requirements for these careers.

For example, future therapists interested in practicing in California can review the Fresno mft education requirements to understand the training and licenses necessary. Similarly, those aiming for Texas can find specific guidance through the resource on how to become a marriage and family therapist in Garland.

If you are considering Arizona, make sure to check the Gilbert mft certification requirements and the Glendale mft certification requirements for city-specific steps. Researching these requirements will help you choose the right online program and ensure you meet state licensure standards, setting you on a successful career path in Psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Shravan Vasishth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles