World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 44 4011 3701 1912 1732 135 14123

T. Florian Jaeger publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by T. Florian Jaeger between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. T. Florian Jaeger published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 5.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2016. 7 of the 142 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2016. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 21 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 4 publications
2002 2025

142 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
T. Florian Jaeger: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 0
2004 0
2005 2
2006 1
2007 3
2008 2
2009 3
2010 6
2011 14
2012 9
2013 12
2014 9
2015 6
2016 21
2017 10
2018 12
2019 9
2020 6
2021 4
2022 2
2023 3
2024 3
2025 4
Total 142
Download as CSV

T. Florian Jaeger publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where T. Florian Jaeger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 134–143 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 135 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434 135
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

T. Florian Jaeger D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where T. Florian Jaeger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269 44
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

T. Florian Jaeger is a researcher affiliated with the University of Rochester in the United States. Their work spans multiple disciplines, primarily focusing on computer science and psychology with significant contributions also in several related subfields.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Computer Science
  • Psychology

Within these broader fields, Jaeger specializes in several subfields such as:

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Signal Processing
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Linguistics and Language

The core topics explored in their research are diverse and interconnected, including:

  • Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Speech and Audio Processing
  • Linguistic Variation and Morphology
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Music and Audio Processing
  • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation

T. Florian Jaeger has contributed scholarly papers appearing in multiple academic venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
  • Journal of Memory and Language
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • ExLing Conferences
  • Cortex

Recent papers by Jaeger document various aspects of speech perception, adaptation, and reading, including:

  • "What we do (not) know about the mechanisms underlying adaptive speech perception: A computational framework and review" (2023, Cortex)
  • "Comparing non-native and native speech: Are L2 productions more variable?" (2020, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America)
  • "Expectation adaptation during natural reading" (2020, Language Cognition and Neuroscience)
  • "How reliable are standard reading time analyses? Hierarchical bootstrap reveals substantial power over-optimism and scale-dependent Type I error inflation" (2024, Journal of Memory and Language)
  • "Using Rational Models to Interpret the Results of Experiments on Accent Adaptation" (2021, Frontiers in Psychology)

Jaeger collaborates regularly with several coauthors, with the most frequent collaborators being:

  • Xin Xie
  • Wednesday Bushong
  • Maryann Tan
  • Santiago Barreda
  • Chigusa Kurumada

Best Publications

  • Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models

    T. Florian Jaeger

  • What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension

    Gina R. Kuperberg;T. Florian Jaeger

  • Redundancy and reduction: Speakers manage syntactic information density

    T. Florian Jaeger

  • Robust speech perception: recognize the familiar, generalize to the similar, and adapt to the novel.

    Dave F. Kleinschmidt;T. Florian Jaeger

  • Alignment as a consequence of expectation adaptation: Syntactic priming is affected by the prime's prediction error given both prior and recent experience

    T. Florian Jaeger;Neal E. Snider

  • Rapid Expectation Adaptation during Syntactic Comprehension.

    Alex B. Fine;T. Florian Jaeger;Thomas A. Farmer;Ting Qian

  • Language learners restructure their input to facilitate efficient communication

    Maryia Fedzechkina;T. Florian Jaeger;Elissa L. Newport

  • The cross-linguistic study of sentence production

    T. Florian Jaeger;Elisabeth J. Norcliffe

  • Implicit Learning and Syntactic Persistence: Surprisal and Cumulativity

    T. Florian Jaeger;Neal Snider

  • Evidence for Implicit Learning in Syntactic Comprehension

    Alex B. Fine;T. Florian Jaeger

  • On language 'utility': processing complexity and communicative efficiency.

    T. Florian Jaeger;Harry Tily

  • When Semantics Meets Phonetics: Acoustical Studies of Second-Occurrence Focus

    David I. Beaver;Brady Zack. Clark;Edward Stanton Flemming;T. Florian. Jaeger

  • R. Harald Baayen. 2008. Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R

    Austin F. Frank;T. Florian Jaeger

  • The source ambiguity problem: Distinguishing the effects of grammar and processing on acceptability judgments

    Philip Hofmeister;T. Florian Jaeger;Inbal Arnon;Ivan A. Sag

  • Cross-linguistic psycholinguistics and its critical role in theory development: early beginnings and recent advances

    Elisabeth Norcliffe;Alice C. Harris;T. Florian Jaeger

  • Mixed effect models for genetic and areal dependencies in linguistic typology

    T. Florian Jaeger;Peter Graff;William Croft;Daniel Pontillo

  • Dynamically adapted context-specific hyper-articulation: Feedback from interlocutors affects speakers' subsequent pronunciations.

    Esteban Buz;Michael K. Tanenhaus;T. Florian Jaeger

  • Lexical Variation in Relativizer Frequency

    Thomas Wasow;T. Florian Jaeger;David M. Orr

  • Communicative efficiency in language production: Optional case-marking in Japanese

    Chigusa Kurumada;T. Florian Jaeger

  • Socially-mediated syntactic alignment

    Kodi Weatherholtz;Kathryn Campbell-Kibler;T. Florian Jaeger

  • Uncertainty and Expectation in Sentence Processing: Evidence From Subcategorization Distributions

    Tal Linzen;T. Florian Jaeger

  • The role of verb repetition in cumulative structural priming in comprehension.

    Alex B. Fine;T. Florian Jaeger

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael K. Tanenhaus
Michael K. Tanenhaus University of Rochester
Elissa L. Newport
Elissa L. Newport Georgetown University
William Croft
William Croft University of New Mexico
Richard N. Aslin
Richard N. Aslin Yale University
Gina R. Kuperberg
Gina R. Kuperberg Tufts University
Ivan A. Sag
Ivan A. Sag Stanford University
John C. Trueswell
John C. Trueswell University of Pennsylvania
Sotaro Kita
Sotaro Kita University of Warwick
Victor S. Ferreira
Victor S. Ferreira University of California, San Diego
Michael C. Frank
Michael C. Frank Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to many flexible study options. For those seeking advanced expertise in fields like counseling, research, or mental health, pursuing an online master degree in psychology can be a practical choice. These programs often provide specializations and are designed to accommodate working professionals.

If your goal is leadership in education, consider expedited opportunities such as 1 year edd programs online. These fast-track doctoral programs allow educators to quickly gain advanced credentials.

Time-efficient learning is increasingly popular. Some students opt for an 1 year online masters to accelerate their career movement, while others may seek an accelerated bachelor's degree online to enter the workforce sooner or switch fields.

Online programs offer flexibility, affordability, and access for students worldwide. They also help professionals balance work, study, and other commitments. Whether you're just starting or looking to advance, exploring these pathways can help you reach your educational and career goals more efficiently.

Best Scientists Citing T. Florian Jaeger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles