World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
40
Citations
7130
World Ranking
8215
National Ranking
4404

Jesse Snedeker publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jesse Snedeker sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 111 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jesse Snedeker D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jesse Snedeker sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jesse Snedeker is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their research spans primarily the fields of Psychology and Neuroscience, with a focus on Developmental and Educational Psychology as well as Cognitive Neuroscience.

Their recent publications cover topics related to language processing, development, and cognition. Notable papers include:

  • Evidence from the visual world paradigm raises questions about unaccusativity and growth curve analyses, 2020, Cognition
  • Logic and conversation revisited: Evidence for a division between semantic and pragmatic content in real-time language comprehension, 2021, UNC Libraries
  • German-speaking children use sentence-initial case marking for predictive language processing at age four, 2021, Cognition
  • The effects of maternal input on language in the absence of genetic confounds: Vocabulary development in internationally adopted children, 2021, Child Development
  • Unexpected words or unexpected languages? Two ERP effects of code-switching in naturalistic discourse, 2021, Cognition

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Snedeker include:

  • Joseph Coffey
  • Anthony Yacovone
  • Margaret Kandel
  • Yi Huang
  • Tatyana Levari

Their work is often published in venues dedicated to language, cognition, and child development. Common publication venues include:

  • Cognition
  • Journal of Child Language
  • UNC Libraries
  • Open Mind
  • Cognitive Psychology

Jesse Snedeker's research focuses on several key topics within their field:

  • Language Development and Disorders
  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The interdisciplinary nature of their work bridges linguistic knowledge, cognitive processes, and developmental psychology. This allows for a multifaceted approach to understanding how language comprehension and acquisition unfold during childhood, as well as how external factors such as maternal input influence vocabulary growth.

Best Publications

  • Using prosody to avoid ambiguity: Effects of speaker awareness and referential context

    Jesse Snedeker;John Trueswell

  • The developing constraints on parsing decisions: The role of lexical-biases and referential scenes in child and adult sentence processing

    Jesse Snedeker;John C. Trueswell

  • Online Interpretation of Scalar Quantifiers: Insight into the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface

    Yi Ting Huang;Jesse Snedeker

  • Quantity judgments and individuation: evidence that mass nouns count.

    David Barner;Jesses Snedeker

  • How words can and cannot be learned by observation

    Tamara Nicol Medina;Jesse Snedeker;John C. Trueswell;Lila R. Gleitman

  • Why It Is Hard to Label Our Concepts.

    J. Snedeker;L. Gleitman;Hall;Waxman

  • Give and Take: Syntactic Priming during Spoken Language Comprehension.

    Malathi Thothathiri;Jesse Snedeker

  • Semantic Meaning and Pragmatic Interpretation in 5-Year-Olds: Evidence from Real-Time Spoken Language Comprehension

    Yi Ting Huang;Jesse Snedeker

  • Syntactic priming during language comprehension in three- and four-year-old children

    Malathi Thothathiri;Jesse Snedeker

  • Effects of prosodic and lexical constraints on parsing in young children (and adults).

    Jesse Snedeker;Sylvia Yuan

  • Counting the Nouns: Simple Structural Cues to Verb Meaning

    Sylvia Yuan;Cynthia D Fisher;Jesse Snedeker

  • Relatives children say.

    Cecile McKee;Dana McDaniel;Jesse Snedeker

  • Mutual exclusivity in autism spectrum disorders: testing the pragmatic hypothesis

    Ashley de Marchena;Inge-Marie Eigsti;Amanda Worek;Kim Emiko Ono

  • Starting Over: International Adoption as a Natural Experiment in Language Development

    Jesse Snedeker;Joy Geren;Carissa L. Shafto

  • Children's assignment of grammatical roles in the online processing of Mandarin passive sentences.

    Yi Ting Huang;Xiaobei Zheng;Xiangzhi Meng;Jesse Snedeker

  • What Exactly Do Numbers Mean

    Yi Ting Huang;Elizabeth S. Spelke;Jesse Snedeker

  • Compositionality and statistics in adjective acquisition: 4-year-olds interpret tall and short based on the size distributions of novel noun referents.

    David Barner;Jesse Snedeker

  • Logic and Conversation Revisited: Evidence For a Division Between Semantic and Pragmatic Content in Real Time Language Comprehension

    Yi Ting Huang;Jesse Snedeker

  • Rapid Linguistic Ambiguity Resolution in Young Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Eye Tracking Evidence for the Limits of Weak Central Coherence.

    Noemi Hahn;Jesse Snedeker;Hugh Rabagliati;Hugh Rabagliati

  • When Is Four Far More Than Three? Children’s Generalization of Newly Acquired Number Words

    Yi Ting Huang;Elizabeth Spelke;Jesse Snedeker

  • Events and the ontology of individuals: verbs as a source of individuating mass and count nouns.

    David Barner;Laura Wagner;Jesse Snedeker

  • The logic in language: How all quantifiers are alike, but each quantifier is different

    Roman Feiman;Jesse Snedeker

  • Cascading activation across levels of representation in children's lexical processing

    Yi Ting Huang;Jesse Snedeker

  • Starting over: A preliminary study of early lexical and syntactic development in internationally adopted preschoolers

    Joy Geren;Jesse Snedeker;Laura Ax

  • How Broad Are Thematic Roles? Evidence From Structural Priming

    Jayden Ziegler;Jesse Snedeker

Frequent Co-Authors

David Barner
David Barner University of California, San Diego
John C. Trueswell
John C. Trueswell University of Pennsylvania
Lila R. Gleitman
Lila R. Gleitman University of Pennsylvania
Elizabeth S. Spelke
Elizabeth S. Spelke Harvard University
Gina R. Kuperberg
Gina R. Kuperberg Tufts University
Rhea Paul
Rhea Paul Sacred Heart University
James L. McClelland
James L. McClelland Stanford University
Frank C. Keil
Frank C. Keil Yale University
Inge-Marie Eigsti
Inge-Marie Eigsti University of Connecticut

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing the right psychology program can be challenging, especially with so many options available online and on-campus. Aspiring psychology professionals should consider program affordability, flexibility, and career outcomes when making their decisions. Fortunately, there are various resources highlighting the most affordable psychology degree programs in New York, most affordable psychology degree programs in New York to meet different learning and financial needs.

Many prospective students are also curious about regional opportunities. For those seeking cost-effective options in the Midwest, you can explore the cheapest psychology programs in Ohio which offer a range of accredited online and traditional degrees. Oklahoma is another state well-known for its affordable educational paths. Explore options through the cheapest psychology degrees in Oklahoma for insight into both in-person and online studies.

For those focused on specific cities, comprehensive listings such as the cheapest psychology degrees in Oklahoma City can help narrow your search and match programs to your lifestyle. Whichever path you choose, an affordable psychology degree opens diverse career opportunities, including counseling, human resources, research, and social work.

Best Scientists Citing Jesse Snedeker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles