D-Index & Metrics Best Publications

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-index D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines. Citations Publications World Ranking National Ranking
Psychology D-index 72 Citations 26,753 153 World Ranking 1164 National Ranking 717

Research.com Recognitions

Awards & Achievements

2018 - David E. Rumelhart Prize for Contributions to the Theoretical Foundations of Human Cognition

2011 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences

2006 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Linguistics
  • Artificial intelligence
  • Programming language

His primary areas of investigation include Linguistics, Word recognition, Context, Eye movement and Syntax. Michael K. Tanenhaus has included themes like Artificial intelligence and Natural language processing in his Linguistics study. His Word recognition research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Pronunciation, Speech recognition, Vowel, Lexical decision task and Priming.

His Context research focuses on Information processing and how it relates to Prediction in language comprehension, Rule-based machine translation, Scalar implicature, Inference and Cognitive science. His Eye movement research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Cognitive psychology, Motor speech, Lexical access, Referent and Object. Michael K. Tanenhaus interconnects Visual perception, Phrase, Reduced relative clause and Ambiguity in the investigation of issues within Syntax.

His most cited work include:

  • Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension (2064 citations)
  • Tracking the Time Course of Spoken Word Recognition Using Eye Movements: Evidence for Continuous Mapping Models (1072 citations)
  • Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. (847 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Michael K. Tanenhaus mostly deals with Linguistics, Context, Artificial intelligence, Natural language processing and Cognitive psychology. His is doing research in Sentence, Comprehension, Verb, Noun and Word recognition, both of which are found in Linguistics. The study incorporates disciplines such as Object and Syntax in addition to Verb.

His work carried out in the field of Word recognition brings together such families of science as Rhyme, Speech recognition, Vowel, Lexicon and Speech perception. His Context study incorporates themes from Utterance, Ambiguity, Spoken language, Psycholinguistics and Set. As part of one scientific family, Michael K. Tanenhaus deals mainly with the area of Cognitive psychology, narrowing it down to issues related to the Eye movement, and often Communication and Motor speech.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Linguistics (59.51%)
  • Context (25.91%)
  • Artificial intelligence (22.27%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2013-2021)?

  • Linguistics (59.51%)
  • Context (25.91%)
  • Cognitive psychology (21.05%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His scientific interests lie mostly in Linguistics, Context, Cognitive psychology, Prosody and Speech recognition. His Linguistics research incorporates themes from Language production, Contextual diversity and Psycholinguistics. Michael K. Tanenhaus has researched Context in several fields, including Communication, Eye movement, Dimension and Adjective.

His research integrates issues of Social psychology and Reading in his study of Cognitive psychology. Many of his research projects under Speech recognition are closely connected to Boundary with Boundary, tying the diverse disciplines of science together. His Sentence research includes themes of Verb and Comprehension.

Between 2013 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Processing scalar implicature: a constraint-based approach. (116 citations)
  • Immediate effects of anticipatory coarticulation in spoken-word recognition (62 citations)
  • Is it or isn’t it: Listeners make rapid use of prosody to infer speaker meanings (44 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Linguistics
  • Artificial intelligence
  • Programming language

Michael K. Tanenhaus mainly investigates Linguistics, Prosody, Speech perception, Interpretation and Sentence. His study of Context is a part of Linguistics. His Context study deals with Adjective intersecting with Pragmatics.

His study in Prosody is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Rhyme, Poetry, Eye rhyme, General knowledge and Congruence. His work deals with themes such as Comprehension, Focus and Reading, which intersect with Interpretation. His research investigates the connection between Sentence and topics such as Verb that intersect with issues in Argument, Reading comprehension, Priming and Voice-onset time.

This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.

Best Publications

Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension

Michael K. Tanenhaus;Michael J. Spivey-Knowlton;Kathleen M. Eberhard;Julie C. Sedivy.
Science (1995)

3135 Citations

Tracking the Time Course of Spoken Word Recognition Using Eye Movements: Evidence for Continuous Mapping Models

Paul D. Allopenna;James S. Magnuson;Michael K. Tanenhaus.
Journal of Memory and Language (1998)

1695 Citations

Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution.

John C. Trueswell;Michael K. Tanenhaus;Susan M. Garnsey.
Journal of Memory and Language (1994)

1494 Citations

Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths.

John C. Trueswell;Michael K. Tanenhaus;Christopher Kello.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition (1993)

970 Citations

When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition

Mark S. Seidenberg;Gloria S. Waters;Marcia A. Barnes;Michael K. Tanenhaus.
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior (1984)

921 Citations

Automatic access of the meanings of ambiguous words in context: Some limitations of knowledge-based processing ☆ ☆☆ ★ ★★

Mark S Seidenberg;Michael K Tanenhaus;James M Leiman;Marie Bienkowski.
Cognitive Psychology (1982)

838 Citations

Modeling the Influence of Thematic Fit (and Other Constraints) in On-line Sentence Comprehension

Ken McRae;Michael J. Spivey-Knowlton;Michael K. Tanenhaus.
Journal of Memory and Language (1998)

754 Citations

Evidence for Multiple Stages in the Processing of Ambiguous Words in Syntactic Contexts.

Michael K. Tanenhaus;James M. Leiman;Mark S. Seidenberg.
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior (1979)

727 Citations

Achieving incremental semantic interpretation through contextual representation

Julie C. Sedivy;Michael K. Tanenhaus;Craig G. Chambers;Gregory N. Carlson.
Cognition (1999)

555 Citations

Orthographic effects on rhyme monitoring.

Mark S. Seidenberg;Michael K. Tanenhaus.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory (1979)

529 Citations

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Contact us

Best Scientists Citing Michael K. Tanenhaus

Martin J. Pickering

Martin J. Pickering

University of Edinburgh

Publications: 76

Edward Gibson

Edward Gibson

MIT

Publications: 66

James M. McQueen

James M. McQueen

Max Planck Society

Publications: 62

Fernanda Ferreira

Fernanda Ferreira

University of California, Davis

Publications: 60

Peter Hagoort

Peter Hagoort

Max Planck Society

Publications: 59

Bob McMurray

Bob McMurray

University of Iowa

Publications: 56

Michael J. Spivey

Michael J. Spivey

University of California, Merced

Publications: 56

T. Florian Jaeger

T. Florian Jaeger

University of Rochester

Publications: 54

James S. Magnuson

James S. Magnuson

University of Connecticut

Publications: 51

Charles Clifton

Charles Clifton

University of Massachusetts Amherst

Publications: 49

Evelina Fedorenko

Evelina Fedorenko

MIT

Publications: 49

Anne Cutler

Anne Cutler

University of Sydney

Publications: 48

Mark S. Seidenberg

Mark S. Seidenberg

University of Wisconsin–Madison

Publications: 45

Colin Phillips

Colin Phillips

University of Maryland, College Park

Publications: 45

Angela D. Friederici

Angela D. Friederici

Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences

Publications: 45

Keith Rayner

Keith Rayner

University of California, San Diego

Publications: 45

Something went wrong. Please try again later.