World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michael K. Tanenhaus

Michael K. Tanenhaus

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 85 1177 1034 731 626 238 31855

Michael K. Tanenhaus publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael K. Tanenhaus between 1975 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael K. Tanenhaus published across 51 years, from 1975 to 2025, averaging 5.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2008. 4 of the 274 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1975 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2008. 1975: 1 publication 1976: 3 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 3 publications 1980: 4 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 3 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 9 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 3 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 15 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 17 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 3 publications 2025: 1 publication
1975 2025

274 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael K. Tanenhaus: publications per year, 1975 to 2025
Year Publications
1975 1
1976 3
1977 0
1978 0
1979 3
1980 4
1981 4
1982 1
1983 0
1984 1
1985 3
1986 2
1987 2
1988 5
1989 9
1990 3
1991 6
1992 1
1993 3
1994 6
1995 7
1996 5
1997 5
1998 5
1999 5
2000 4
2001 4
2002 10
2003 8
2004 7
2005 12
2006 15
2007 12
2008 17
2009 14
2010 6
2011 10
2012 7
2013 14
2014 7
2015 12
2016 5
2017 7
2018 4
2019 4
2020 0
2021 3
2022 3
2023 1
2024 3
2025 1
Total 274
Download as CSV

Michael K. Tanenhaus publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael K. Tanenhaus sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 231–240 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 238 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226 238
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Michael K. Tanenhaus D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael K. Tanenhaus sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 84–85 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86 85
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - David E. Rumelhart Prize for Contributions to the Theoretical Foundations of Human Cognition
  • 2011 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 2006 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Michael K. Tanenhaus is affiliated with the University of Rochester in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields with a focus on psychology and neuroscience, totaling 13 and 6 publications respectively. Within these domains, they have contributed to several subfields including experimental and cognitive psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and developmental and educational psychology. Additionally, their work touches on artificial intelligence and linguistics and language.

The main topics explored in their research include neurobiology of language and bilingualism, reading and literacy development, phonetics and phonology research, speech and dialogue systems, language, metaphor, and cognition, multisensory perception and integration, and neuroscience and music perception. These thematic areas reflect a broad and interdisciplinary approach to understanding cognitive and neural mechanisms related to language and perception.

Michael K. Tanenhaus has published in a range of academic journals, including:

  • Topics in Cognitive Science
  • Journal of Memory and Language
  • Scientific Studies of Reading
  • Developmental Science
  • Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research

Their recent papers demonstrate active research in language comprehension, reading acquisition, and speech perception. Some notable papers include:

  • "Syllable Inference as a Mechanism for Spoken Language Understanding" (2021, Topics in Cognitive Science)
  • "Effects of Character and Word Contextual Diversity in Chinese Beginning Readers" (2020, Scientific Studies of Reading)
  • "Musical coordination affects children's perspective-taking, but musical synchrony does not" (2022, Developmental Science)
  • "Maintenance of subcategorical information during speech perception: Revisiting misunderstood limitations" (2024, Journal of Memory and Language)
  • "Predictions of Miscommunication in Verbal Communication During Collaborative Joint Action" (2021, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research)

Frequent collaborators in Michael K. Tanenhaus's projects include Qingrong Chen, Yingjia Wan, Yipu Wei, Meredith Brown, and Laura C. Dilley. These coauthorships indicate ongoing collaborative research activities in related fields.

Michael K. Tanenhaus has been recognized with several awards such as the David E. Rumelhart Prize for Contributions to the Theoretical Foundations of Human Cognition in 2018. They were also named a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 2011 and a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2006.

Best Publications

  • Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension

    Michael K. Tanenhaus;Michael J. Spivey-Knowlton;Kathleen M. Eberhard;Julie C. Sedivy

  • Tracking the Time Course of Spoken Word Recognition Using Eye Movements: Evidence for Continuous Mapping Models

    Paul D. Allopenna;James S. Magnuson;Michael K. Tanenhaus

  • Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution.

    John C. Trueswell;Michael K. Tanenhaus;Susan M. Garnsey

  • Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths.

    John C. Trueswell;Michael K. Tanenhaus;Christopher Kello

  • When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition

    Mark S. Seidenberg;Gloria S. Waters;Marcia A. Barnes;Michael K. Tanenhaus

  • Automatic access of the meanings of ambiguous words in context: Some limitations of knowledge-based processing ☆ ☆☆ ★ ★★

    Mark S Seidenberg;Michael K Tanenhaus;James M Leiman;Marie Bienkowski

  • Modeling the Influence of Thematic Fit (and Other Constraints) in On-line Sentence Comprehension

    Ken McRae;Michael J. Spivey-Knowlton;Michael K. Tanenhaus

  • Evidence for Multiple Stages in the Processing of Ambiguous Words in Syntactic Contexts.

    Michael K. Tanenhaus;James M. Leiman;Mark S. Seidenberg

  • Achieving incremental semantic interpretation through contextual representation

    Julie C. Sedivy;Michael K. Tanenhaus;Craig G. Chambers;Gregory N. Carlson

  • Time course of frequency effects in spoken-word recognition: evidence from eye movements.

    Delphine Dahan;James S. Magnuson;Michael K. Tanenhaus

  • Orthographic effects on rhyme monitoring.

    Mark S. Seidenberg;Michael K. Tanenhaus

  • The effects of common ground and perspective on domains of referential interpretation

    Joy E Hanna;Michael K Tanenhaus;John C Trueswell

  • Gradient effects of within-category phonetic variation on lexical access.

    Bob McMurray;Michael K. Tanenhaus;Richard N. Aslin

  • Eye movements as a window into real-time spoken language comprehension in natural contexts

    Kathleen M. Eberhard;Michael J. Spivey-Knowlton;Julie C. Sedivy;Michael K. Tanenhaus

  • Perception of speech reflects optimal use of probabilistic speech cues

    Meghan Clayards;Michael K. Tanenhaus;Richard N. Aslin;Robert A. Jacobs

  • Eye movements and spoken language comprehension: effects of visual context on syntactic ambiguity resolution.

    Michael J Spivey;Michael K Tanenhaus;Kathleen M Eberhard;Julie C Sedivy

  • Verb Argument Structure in Parsing and Interpretation: Evidence from wh-Questions

    Julie E. Boland;Michael K. Tanenhaus;Susan M. Garnsey;Greg N. Carlson

  • Afterword The impact of “The cognitive basis for linguistic structures”

    Unknown

  • Accent and reference resolution in spoken-language comprehension

    Delphine Dahan;Michael K. Tanenhaus;Craig G. Chambers

  • Subcategorical mismatches and the time course of lexical access: Evidence for lexical competition

    Delphine Dahan;James S. Magnuson;Michael K. Tanenhaus;Ellen M. Hogan

  • Actions and Affordances in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution.

    Craig G. Chambers;Michael K. Tanenhaus;James S. Magnuson

  • Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution in Discourse: Modeling the Effects of Referential Context and Lexical Frequency

    Michael J. Spivey;Michael K. Tanenhaus

  • The weckud wetch of the wast: lexical adaptation to a novel accent.

    Jessica Maye;Richard N. Aslin;Michael K. Tanenhaus

  • Natural Language Parsing: Psychological, Computational, and Theoretical Perspectives

    David R. Dowty;Lauri Karttunen;Arnold M. Zwicky

  • “Some,” and possibly all, scalar inferences are not delayed: Evidence for immediate pragmatic enrichment

    Daniel J. Grodner;Natalie M. Klein;Kathleen M. Carbary;Michael K. Tanenhaus

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard N. Aslin
Richard N. Aslin Yale University
Greg N. Carlson
Greg N. Carlson University of Rochester
James S. Magnuson
James S. Magnuson University of Connecticut
Bob McMurray
Bob McMurray University of Iowa
Sarah Brown-Schmidt
Sarah Brown-Schmidt Vanderbilt University
Mark S. Seidenberg
Mark S. Seidenberg University of Wisconsin–Madison
John C. Trueswell
John C. Trueswell University of Pennsylvania
James F. Allen
James F. Allen University of Rochester
T. Florian Jaeger
T. Florian Jaeger University of Rochester
Ken McRae
Ken McRae University of Western Ontario

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a psychology degree in the USA opens a wide variety of online pathways, especially in fields like marriage and family therapy (MFT). Online degrees provide flexibility for busy students and those balancing work or family commitments. Many programs are structured to meet state-specific licensing requirements, preparing you for a seamless transition from your education to your professional career.

Requirements often vary by location. If you’re interested in learning how to become an mft in St. Petersburg or want to understand the mft requirements in Stockton, it’s critical to research each state’s educational and clinical experience prerequisites. Similarly, the process for how to become a marriage and family therapist in Tampa and Toledo mft certification requirements may differ.

By exploring accredited online psychology programs, you can tailor your education to your career goals while meeting all necessary local certification requirements. This strategic approach supports a smooth pathway to licensure and a rewarding career in mental health services.

Best Scientists Citing Michael K. Tanenhaus

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles