World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
9659
World Ranking
7777
National Ranking
4177

James S. Magnuson publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James S. Magnuson sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 121 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

James S. Magnuson D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James S. Magnuson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

James S. Magnuson is affiliated with the University of Connecticut in the United States and has a research focus spanning several interrelated fields including Computer Science, Psychology, and Neuroscience. Their work often intersects with key subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Signal Processing, and Developmental and Educational Psychology.

Their main topics of research encompass Phonetics and Phonology Research, Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism, Speech Recognition and Synthesis, Speech and Audio Processing, Reading and Literacy Development, Neural Networks and Applications, and Neural dynamics and brain function.

Magnuson's publication record includes contributions to multiple prominent venues frequently publishing research in cognition and perception. These venues include Cognitive Science, Attention Perception & Psychophysics, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, and Cognition.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Magnuson illustrate specific research interests and advances in speech recognition, word recognition, and the integration of feedback mechanisms in language processing. Notable publications include:

  • EARSHOT: A Minimal Neural Network Model of Incremental Human Speech Recognition, 2020, Cognitive Science
  • Talker familiarity and the accommodation of talker variability, 2021, Attention Perception & Psychophysics
  • Contra assertions, feedback improves word recognition: How feedback and lateral inhibition sharpen signals over noise, 2023, Cognition

Frequent collaborators include Sahil Luthra, Anne Marie Crinnion, David Saltzman, Emily B. Myers, and Heejo You, indicating active engagement in cooperative research efforts.

Best Publications

  • Tracking the Time Course of Spoken Word Recognition Using Eye Movements: Evidence for Continuous Mapping Models

    Paul D. Allopenna;James S. Magnuson;Michael K. Tanenhaus

  • Time course of frequency effects in spoken-word recognition: evidence from eye movements.

    Delphine Dahan;James S. Magnuson;Michael K. Tanenhaus

  • Statistical and computational models of the visual world paradigm: Growth curves and individual differences

    Daniel Mirman;James A. Dixon;James S. Magnuson

  • Subcategorical mismatches and the time course of lexical access: Evidence for lexical competition

    Delphine Dahan;James S. Magnuson;Michael K. Tanenhaus;Ellen M. Hogan

  • Actions and Affordances in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution.

    Craig G. Chambers;Michael K. Tanenhaus;James S. Magnuson

  • Eye movements and lexical access in spoken-language comprehension: evaluating a linking hypothesis between fixations and linguistic processing.

    Michael K. Tanenhaus;James S. Magnuson;Delphine Dahan;Craig Chambers

  • The Dynamics of Lexical Competition During Spoken Word Recognition

    James S. Magnuson;James A. Dixon;Michael K. Tanenhaus;Richard N. Aslin

  • Acoustic differences, listener expectations, and the perceptual accommodation of talker variability.

    James S. Magnuson;Howard C. Nusbaum

  • The time course of spoken word learning and recognition: studies with artificial lexicons.

    James S. Magnuson;Michael K. Tanenhaus;Richard N. Aslin;Delphine Dahan

  • Linguistic Gender and Spoken-Word Recognition in French

    Delphine Dahan;Daniel Swingley;Michael K. Tanenhaus;James S. Magnuson

  • Spoken Word Recognition

    Delphine Dahan;James S. Magnuson;James S. Magnuson

  • The Time Course of Anticipatory Constraint Integration

    Anuenue Kukona;Shin-Yi Fang;Shin-Yi Fang;Karen A. Aicher;Karen A. Aicher;Helen Chen

  • Attractor Dynamics and Semantic Neighborhood Density: Processing Is Slowed by Near Neighbors and Speeded by Distant Neighbors

    Daniel Mirman;James S. Magnuson

  • Spoken word recognition without a TRACE

    Thomas Hannagan;James S. Magnuson;James S. Magnuson;Jonathan Grainger

  • The Link between Statistical Segmentation and Word Learning in Adults.

    Daniel Mirman;James S. Magnuson;James S. Magnuson;Katharine Graf Estes;James A. Dixon;James A. Dixon

  • The dynamics of insight: mathematical discovery as a phase transition.

    Damian G. Stephen;Rebecca A. Boncoddo;James S. Magnuson;James S. Magnuson;James A. Dixon;James A. Dixon

  • Lexical effects on compensation for coarticulation: the ghost of Christmash past

    James S. Magnuson;Bob McMurray;Michael K. Tanenhaus;Richard N. Aslin

  • jTRACE: A reimplementation and extension of the TRACE model of speech perception and spoken word recognition

    Ted J. Strauss;Harlan D. Harris;James S. Magnuson;James S. Magnuson

  • Vocabulary does not complicate the simple view of reading

    David Braze;Leonard Katz;Leonard Katz;James S. Magnuson;James S. Magnuson;W. Einar Mencl

  • Theories of spoken word recognition deficits in aphasia: evidence from eye-tracking and computational modeling

    Daniel Mirman;Eiling Yee;Sheila E. Blumstein;James S. Magnuson;James S. Magnuson

  • Eye Movements and Spoken Language Comprehension

    Michael K. Tanenhaus;John C. Trueswell

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael K. Tanenhaus
Michael K. Tanenhaus University of Rochester
Daniel Mirman
Daniel Mirman University of Edinburgh
Donald Shankweiler
Donald Shankweiler University of Connecticut
Richard N. Aslin
Richard N. Aslin Yale University
Kenneth R. Pugh
Kenneth R. Pugh Haskins Laboratories
W. Einar Mencl
W. Einar Mencl Yale University
Nicole Landi
Nicole Landi University of Connecticut
Leonard Katz
Leonard Katz Haskins Laboratories
Carol A. Fowler
Carol A. Fowler University of Connecticut
Bob McMurray
Bob McMurray University of Iowa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens doors to diverse career paths, both in clinical practice and research. Many students pursue online programs that provide flexible study options while meeting rigorous accreditation standards. A popular route for graduates is becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT), a role that is in demand across the United States.

Certification and licensure requirements for MFTs vary by state and city. For example, you can learn more about Milwaukee mft certification requirements or discover the steps on how to become a marriage and family therapist in Minneapolis. These pathways usually involve earning a master's degree, completing supervised clinical hours, and passing a state-approved exam.

In cities like Nashville, understanding Nashville mft certification requirements is essential for future therapists. Similarly, students interested in the Southeast can explore how to become an mft in New Orleans for local guidance.

Choosing the right online degree and career path maximizes your potential and aligns your education with local professional requirements, setting you up for meaningful and impactful work in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing James S. Magnuson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles