World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
42
Citations
7362
World Ranking
7549
National Ranking
744

Daniel Mirman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Mirman sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 117 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Daniel Mirman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Mirman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel Mirman is affiliated with the University of Edinburgh in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple disciplines, focusing primarily on neuroscience, psychology, and medicine. Within these main fields, their work extensively covers cognitive neuroscience, social psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, developmental and educational psychology, and psychiatry and mental health.

Their scholarly output includes a substantial number of publications distributed across several key scientific venues. The most frequent publication outlets for Daniel Mirman include Cortex, Brain Communications, Brain and Language, Cerebral Cortex, and Behavior Research Methods.

Daniel Mirman's research topics emphasize neurobiology of language and bilingualism, neural and behavioral psychology studies, action observation and synchronization, functional brain connectivity studies, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, dementia and cognitive impairment research, and language, metaphor, and cognition.

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Daniel Mirman include:

  • "GazeR: A Package for Processing Gaze Position and Pupil Size Data" (2020), published in Behavior Research Methods
  • "A data-driven approach to post-stroke aphasia classification and lesion-based prediction" (2021), published in Brain
  • "What we mean when we say semantic: Toward a multidisciplinary semantic glossary" (2024), published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • "Developmental trajectories of ADHD symptoms in a large population-representative longitudinal study" (2021), published in Psychological Medicine
  • "Stroke lesion size - Still a useful biomarker for stroke severity and outcome in times of high-dimensional models" (2023), published in NeuroImage Clinical

Frequent collaborators in their research include Melissa Thye, Paul Hoffman, Aja Louise Murray, Jerzy P. Szaflarski, and Junhua Ding. These co-authors have contributed multiple times alongside Daniel Mirman, supporting interdisciplinary and collaborative approaches within their investigations.

Best Publications

  • Growth Curve Analysis and Visualization Using R

    Daniel Mirman

  • Statistical and computational models of the visual world paradigm: Growth curves and individual differences

    Daniel Mirman;James A. Dixon;James S. Magnuson

  • Are there interactive processes in speech perception

    James L. McClelland;Daniel Mirman;Lori L. Holt

  • Neuroanatomical dissociation for taxonomic and thematic knowledge in the human brain.

    Myrna F. Schwartz;Daniel Y. Kimberg;Grant M. Walker;Adelyn Brecher

  • Neural organization of spoken language revealed by lesion-symptom mapping.

    Daniel Mirman;Qi Chen;Yongsheng Zhang;Ze Wang;Ze Wang

  • Competition and cooperation among similar representations: toward a unified account of facilitative and inhibitory effects of lexical neighbors.

    Qi Chen;Daniel Mirman

  • Taxonomic and thematic semantic systems.

    Daniel Mirman;Jon Frederick Landrigan;Allison E. Britt

  • Attractor Dynamics and Semantic Neighborhood Density: Processing Is Slowed by Near Neighbors and Speeded by Distant Neighbors

    Daniel Mirman;James S. Magnuson

  • Linking language and categorization: evidence from aphasia.

    Gary Lupyan;Daniel Mirman

  • The Link between Statistical Segmentation and Word Learning in Adults.

    Daniel Mirman;James S. Magnuson;James S. Magnuson;Katharine Graf Estes;James A. Dixon;James A. Dixon

  • What we talk about when we talk about access deficits

    Daniel Mirman;Allison E. Britt

  • Multifractal Dynamics in the Emergence of Cognitive Structure

    James A. Dixon;John G. Holden;Daniel Mirman;Damian G. Stephen

  • Interactive activation and mutual constraint satisfaction in perception and cognition.

    James L. McClelland;Daniel Mirman;Donald J. Bolger;Pranav Khaitan

  • Lifting cognition: a meta-analysis of effects of resistance exercise on cognition.

    Jon Frederick Landrigan;Tyler Bell;Michael Crowe;Olivio J. Clay

  • Theories of spoken word recognition deficits in aphasia: evidence from eye-tracking and computational modeling

    Daniel Mirman;Eiling Yee;Sheila E. Blumstein;James S. Magnuson;James S. Magnuson

  • An interactive Hebbian account of lexically guided tuning of speech perception.

    Daniel Mirman;James L. McClelland;Lori L. Holt

  • Dynamics of activation of semantically similar concepts during spoken word recognition

    Daniel Mirman;James S. Magnuson;James S. Magnuson

  • Individual Differences in the Strength of Taxonomic versus Thematic Relations.

    Daniel Mirman;Kristen M. Graziano

  • GazeR: A Package for Processing Gaze Position and Pupil Size Data

    Jason Geller;Matthew B. Winn;Tristian Mahr;Daniel Mirman

  • A Large, Searchable, Web-based Database of Aphasic Performance on Picture Naming and Other Tests of Cognitive Function

    Daniel Mirman;Ted J. Strauss;Adelyn Brecher;Grant M. Walker

  • Effects of Attention on the Strength of Lexical Influences on Speech Perception: Behavioral Experiments and Computational Mechanisms.

    Daniel Mirman;James L. McClelland;Lori L. Holt;James S. Magnuson

  • Corrections for multiple comparisons in voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping.

    Daniel Mirman;Jon-Frederick Landrigan;Spiro Kokolis;Sean Verillo

Frequent Co-Authors

James S. Magnuson
James S. Magnuson University of Connecticut
James L. McClelland
James L. McClelland Stanford University
Lori L. Holt
Lori L. Holt Carnegie Mellon University
Gary S. Dell
Gary S. Dell University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Myrna F. Schwartz
Myrna F. Schwartz Temple University
Laurel J. Buxbaum
Laurel J. Buxbaum Thomas Jefferson University
H. Branch Coslett
H. Branch Coslett University of Pennsylvania
Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells
Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats
Aja Louise Murray
Aja Louise Murray University of Edinburgh
John Kounios
John Kounios Drexel University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens up diverse career pathways, especially with the growing demand for mental health professionals across the United States. Students considering this field often explore related online degrees and flexible study options to fit their lifestyles and career goals.

Many regions in the U.S. offer reputable programs tailored to specific needs. For instance, the top counseling degree programs in the West are known for their innovative curriculum and expert faculty. In the Midwest, the best counseling program rankings in Wisconsin showcase highly respected schools with solid career outcomes.

For those preferring flexibility, online learning is a popular choice. Students interested in remote study can explore online counseling degrees in California, which allow for accessible, high-quality education from anywhere in the state. Additionally, those seeking advanced qualifications can consider the Pennsylvania online master's in counseling program rankings for top postgraduate options.

Carefully comparing these programs helps students find the best fit for their educational and professional ambitions. By choosing the right degree pathway, you can lay the foundation for a rewarding career in counseling, therapy, or mental health services.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel Mirman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles