World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 77 1637 1468 184 169 176 25033
Neuroscience 77 1813 1655 189 172 173 25014

Matthew H. Davis publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Matthew H. Davis between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Matthew H. Davis published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 8.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2012. 21 of the 235 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2012. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 14 publications
1998 2025

235 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Matthew H. Davis: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 0
2000 5
2001 0
2002 4
2003 4
2004 3
2005 6
2006 12
2007 11
2008 14
2009 9
2010 10
2011 7
2012 20
2013 10
2014 5
2015 3
2016 8
2017 18
2018 12
2019 12
2020 16
2021 8
2022 10
2023 6
2024 7
2025 14
Total 235
Download as CSV

Matthew H. Davis publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew H. Davis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 176 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450 176
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Matthew H. Davis D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew H. Davis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 76–77 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132 77
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Matthew H. Davis is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom and has published extensively in the field of neuroscience. Their research primarily focuses on cognitive neuroscience with substantial contributions to developmental and educational psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, artificial intelligence, and neurology.

The scientist's work encompasses several main topics, including neural dynamics and brain function, neuroscience and music perception, hearing loss and rehabilitation, neurobiology of language and bilingualism, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, functional brain connectivity studies, and multisensory perception and integration.

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Matthew H. Davis include:

  • Sustained neural rhythms reveal endogenous oscillations supporting speech perception, 2021, PLoS Biology
  • The relationship between sentence comprehension and lexical-semantic retuning, 2020, Journal of Memory and Language
  • Rapid computations of spectrotemporal prediction error support perception of degraded speech, 2020, eLife
  • A checklist for assessing the methodological quality of concurrent tES-fMRI studies (ContES checklist): a consensus study and statement, 2022, Nature Protocols
  • The Dramatic Impact of Explicit Instruction on Learning to Read in a New Writing System, 2021, Psychological Science

Frequent co-authors include Ediz Sohoglu, Rebecca A. Gilbert, Benedikt Zoefel, Lucy MacGregor, and Jennifer M. Rodd. These collaborations indicate active engagement in multidisciplinary research teams within neuroscience and related cognitive and psychological sciences.

Matthew H. Davis publishes regularly in notable scientific journals and venues. These include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neurobiology of Language
  • Cortex
  • PLoS Biology

The range of publication venues and coauthors, together with the main and subfields of study, reflect a broad and integrative approach to investigating brain function, language, and perception using experimental and computational methods. This comprehensive research profile illustrates an emphasis on understanding mechanisms underlying cognitive processes and neural activity patterns related to speech and language comprehension, as well as sensory and multisensory integration.

Best Publications

  • Detecting Awareness in the Vegetative State

    Adrian M. Owen;Martin R. Coleman;Melanie Boly;Matthew H. Davis

  • Hierarchical Processing in Spoken Language Comprehension

    Matthew H. Davis;Ingrid S. Johnsrude

  • Speech recognition in adverse conditions: A review

    Sven L. Mattys;Matthew H. Davis;Ann R. Bradlow;Sophie K. Scott

  • The broth in my brother's brothel: morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition.

    Kathleen Rastle;Matthew H. Davis;Boris New

  • Individual Differences in Reward Drive Predict Neural Responses to Images of Food

    John D. Beaver;Andrew David Lawrence;Jenneke van Ditzhuijzen;Matt H. Davis

  • The Neural Mechanisms of Speech Comprehension: fMRI studies of Semantic Ambiguity

    Jennifer M. Rodd;Matthew H. Davis;Ingrid S. Johnsrude

  • Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study

    Kathleen Rastle;Matt H. Davis;William D. Marslen-Wilson;Lorraine K. Tyler

  • The time course of visual word recognition as revealed by linear regression analysis of ERP data.

    Olaf Hauk;Matthew H. Davis;M. Ford;Friedemann Pulvermüller

  • Neural Oscillations Carry Speech Rhythm through to Comprehension.

    Jonathan E. Peelle;Matthew H. Davis

  • Phase-Locked Responses to Speech in Human Auditory Cortex are Enhanced During Comprehension

    Jonathan E. Peelle;Joachim Gross;Matthew H. Davis

  • A complementary systems account of word learning: neural and behavioural evidence

    Matthew H. Davis;M. Gareth Gaskell

  • Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography

    Kathleen Rastle;Matthew H. Davis

  • Lexical Information Drives Perceptual Learning of Distorted Speech: Evidence From the Comprehension of Noise-Vocoded Sentences.

    Matthew H. Davis;Ingrid S. Johnsrude;Alexis Hervais-Adelman;Karen Taylor

  • Hearing speech sounds: top-down influences on the interface between audition and speech perception.

    Matthew H. Davis;Ingrid S. Johnsrude

  • Susceptibility-induced loss of signal: comparing PET and fMRI on a semantic task.

    Joseph T. Devlin;Richard P. Russell;Matt H. Davis;Cathy J. Price

  • Effortful Listening: The Processing of Degraded Speech Depends Critically on Attention

    Conor J Wild;Afiqah Yusuf;Daryl E Wilson;Jonathan E Peelle;Jonathan E Peelle

  • Can cognitive models explain brain activation during word and pseudoword reading? A meta-analysis of 36 neuroimaging studies.

    J. S. H. Taylor;Kathleen Rastle;Matthew H. Davis

  • Predictive Top-Down Integration of Prior Knowledge during Speech Perception

    Ediz Sohoglu;Jonathan E. Peelle;Robert P. Carlyon;Matthew H. Davis

  • When thoughts become action: An fMRI paradigm to study volitional brain activity in non-communicative brain injured patients

    Mélanie Boly;Martin R. Coleman;M. H. Davis;Adam Hampshire

  • Learning and consolidation of novel spoken words

    Matthew H. Davis;Anna Maria Di Betta;Mark J. E. Macdonald;M. Gareth Gaskell

  • Detecting awareness in the vegetative state.

    Adrian M. Owen;Martin R. Coleman

Frequent Co-Authors

Ingrid S. Johnsrude
Ingrid S. Johnsrude University of Western Ontario
Jennifer M. Rodd
Jennifer M. Rodd University College London
Kathleen Rastle
Kathleen Rastle Royal Holloway University of London
Adrian M. Owen
Adrian M. Owen University of Western Ontario
John D. Pickard
John D. Pickard University of Cambridge
Robert P. Carlyon
Robert P. Carlyon University of Cambridge
William D. Marslen-Wilson
William D. Marslen-Wilson University of Cambridge
Jonathan E. Peelle
Jonathan E. Peelle Washington University in St. Louis
M. Gareth Gaskell
M. Gareth Gaskell University of York
David K. Menon
David K. Menon University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering an online psychology degree can open diverse career pathways, from counseling and therapy to research and education. Many top universities now offer flexible online programs, allowing you to balance your studies with personal commitments. When choosing a program, factors like accreditation, faculty expertise, and student support services play a vital role in your learning experience and future success.

Different regions in the USA offer distinctive strengths. For example, students can explore the top psychology degrees in Newark or check the best psychology program rankings in New Hampshire to find the right fit. Likewise, those in the west may consider the best psychology degree rankings in Orange, while students in Florida can look into top psychology programs in Orlando.

An online degree’s flexibility prepares graduates for immediate entry into roles like case management, mental health support, or further study toward advanced credentials. No matter where you choose to study, researching your options can help you find a program that matches both your academic and professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Matthew H. Davis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles