World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 41 7912 7383 781 746 125 6919

Jennifer M. Rodd publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jennifer M. Rodd between 1974 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jennifer M. Rodd published across 52 years, from 1974 to 2025, averaging 3 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2022. 17 of the 158 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1974 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2022. 1974: 1 publication 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 2 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 3 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 7 publications
1974 2025

158 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jennifer M. Rodd: publications per year, 1974 to 2025
Year Publications
1974 1
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 1
1993 0
1994 1
1995 0
1996 0
1997 1
1998 0
1999 0
2000 3
2001 2
2002 2
2003 0
2004 6
2005 5
2006 2
2007 2
2008 0
2009 1
2010 2
2011 2
2012 4
2013 1
2014 3
2015 7
2016 8
2017 15
2018 12
2019 14
2020 9
2021 8
2022 16
2023 13
2024 10
2025 7
Total 158
Download as CSV

Jennifer M. Rodd publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jennifer M. Rodd sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 125 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 125
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jennifer M. Rodd D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jennifer M. Rodd sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 41
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jennifer M. Rodd is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily Psychology and Neuroscience, with significant contributions also in Computer Science.

The scientist's work focuses extensively on topics related to language processing and development. Main topics of research include:

  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Language Development and Disorders
  • Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Speech and dialogue systems
  • Text Readability and Simplification

Jennifer M. Rodd's publication record includes many papers in notable venues. Frequent publication venues consist of:

  • Journal of Cognition
  • Journal of Memory and Language
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Jennifer M. Rodd include:

  • Settling Into Semantic Space: An Ambiguity-Focused Account of Word-Meaning Access, 2020, Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • Moving experimental psychology online: How to obtain high quality data when we can't see our participants, 2023, Journal of Memory and Language
  • The relationship between sentence comprehension and lexical-semantic retuning, 2020, Journal of Memory and Language
  • Recovery from misinterpretations during online sentence processing, 2020, Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition
  • Pupil Dilation Is Sensitive to Semantic Ambiguity and Acoustic Degradation, 2020, Trends in Hearing

The scientist collaborates frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • M. Gareth Gaskell
  • Rachael Catherine Hulme
  • Rebecca A. Gilbert
  • Lena Maria Blott
  • Matthew HC Mak

Their publications contribute to a range of subfields within the broader disciplines, notably:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Computer Science Applications

Best Publications

  • The Neural Mechanisms of Speech Comprehension: fMRI studies of Semantic Ambiguity

    Jennifer M. Rodd;Matthew H. Davis;Ingrid S. Johnsrude

  • Making Sense of Semantic Ambiguity: Semantic Competition in Lexical Access

    Jennifer Rodd;Gareth Gaskell;William Marslen-Wilson

  • Towards the routine use of brain imaging to aid the clinical diagnosis of disorders of consciousness

    M. R. Coleman;M. H. Davis;J. M. Rodd;T. Robson

  • Processing Objects at Different Levels of Specificity

    L. K. Tyler;E. A. Stamatakis;P. Bright;K. Acres

  • Do vegetative patients retain aspects of language comprehension? Evidence from fMRI

    Martin R Coleman;Jennifer M Rodd;Matthew H Davis;Ingrid S Johnsrude

  • Dissociating speech perception and comprehension at reduced levels of awareness

    Matthew H. Davis;Martin R. Coleman;Anthony R. Absalom;Jennifer M. Rodd

  • Modelling the effects of semantic ambiguity in word recognition

    Jennifer M. Rodd;M. Gareth Gaskell;William D. Marslen-Wilson

  • The functional organisation of the fronto-temporal language system: Evidence from syntactic and semantic ambiguity

    Jennifer M. Rodd;Olivia A. Longe;Billi Randall;Lorraine K. Tyler

  • Anteromedial Temporal Cortex Supports Fine-grained Differentiation among Objects

    H.E. Moss;J.M. Rodd;E.A. Stamatakis;P. Bright

  • Localising semantic and syntactic processing in spoken and written language comprehension: an Activation Likelihood Estimation meta-analysis.

    Jennifer M. Rodd;Sylvia Vitello;Anna M. Woollams;Patti Adank;Patti Adank

  • Residual auditory function in persistent vegetative state: a combined pet and fmri study

    Adrian M. Owen;Martin R. Coleman;David K. Menon;Ingrid S. Johnsrude

  • Distinctiveness and correlation in conceptual structure: behavioral and computational studies.

    Billi Randall;Helen E. Moss;Jennifer M. Rodd;Mike Greer

  • Long-term priming of the meanings of ambiguous words

    Jennifer M. Rodd;Belen Lopez Cutrin;Hannah Kirsch;Alessandra Millar

  • The impact of recent and long-term experience on access to word meanings: Evidence from large-scale internet-based experiments

    Jennifer M. Rodd;Zhenguang G. Cai;Hannah N. Betts;Betsy Hanby

  • Why Clowns Taste Funny: The Relationship between Humor and Semantic Ambiguity

    Tristan A. Bekinschtein;Matthew H. Davis;Jennifer M. Rodd;Adrian M. Owen

  • Learning new meanings for old words: effects of semantic relatedness

    Jennifer M. Rodd;Richard Berriman;Matt Landau;Theresa Lee

  • Settling Into Semantic Space: An Ambiguity-Focused Account of Word-Meaning Access:

    Jennifer M Rodd

  • Interleaved silent steady state (ISSS) imaging: a new sparse imaging method applied to auditory fMRI.

    Christian Schwarzbauer;Matthew H. Davis;Jennifer M. Rodd;Ingrid S. Johnsrude;Ingrid S. Johnsrude

  • The role of domain-general frontal systems in language comprehension: Evidence from dual-task interference and semantic ambiguity

    Jennifer M. Rodd;Ingrid S. Johnsrude;Matthew H. Davis

  • Accent modulates access to word meaning: Evidence for a speaker-model account of spoken word recognition.

    Zhenguang Garry Cai;Zhenguang Garry Cai;Rebecca A. Gilbert;Matthew H. Davis;M. Gareth Gaskell

  • Dissociating Frontotemporal Contributions to Semantic Ambiguity Resolution in Spoken Sentences

    Jennifer M. Rodd;Ingrid S. Johnsrude;Matthew H. Davis

  • Do vegetative patients retain aspects of language comprehension? Evidence from fMRI. Commentary

    Nicholas D. Schiff;Martin R. Coleman;Jennifer M. Rodd;Matthew H. Davis

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthew H. Davis
Matthew H. Davis University of Cambridge
Ingrid S. Johnsrude
Ingrid S. Johnsrude University of Western Ontario
Adrian M. Owen
Adrian M. Owen University of Western Ontario
M. Gareth Gaskell
M. Gareth Gaskell University of York
David K. Menon
David K. Menon University of Cambridge
Lorraine K. Tyler
Lorraine K. Tyler University of Cambridge
Helen E. Moss
Helen E. Moss University of Cambridge
William D. Marslen-Wilson
William D. Marslen-Wilson University of Cambridge
John D. Pickard
John D. Pickard University of Cambridge
Anna M. Woollams
Anna M. Woollams University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a degree in psychology can open the door to numerous online programs and diverse career opportunities in the mental health field. Many students choose online psychology degrees for their flexibility, especially those interested in becoming licensed therapists or counselors.

Each state and city has unique requirements for licensure. For example, if you are interested in becoming a licensed therapist in Buffalo, you’ll need to follow specific education and training pathways. Similarly, the process for becoming a licensed therapist in Chandler or becoming a licensed therapist in Charlotte may differ based on local regulations and required credentials.

It’s essential to choose an online program that meets the licensure requirements for your area. For up-to-date information on licensed therapist requirements in Chesapeake or another location, research your state’s guidelines. Paying close attention to these details ensures your online degree prepares you for a rewarding career and state certification.

Best Scientists Citing Jennifer M. Rodd

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles