World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
6919
World Ranking
7912
National Ranking
781

Jennifer M. Rodd publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jennifer M. Rodd sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 125 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jennifer M. Rodd D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jennifer M. Rodd sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jennifer M. Rodd is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily Psychology and Neuroscience, with significant contributions also in Computer Science.

The scientist's work focuses extensively on topics related to language processing and development. Main topics of research include:

  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Language Development and Disorders
  • Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Speech and dialogue systems
  • Text Readability and Simplification

Jennifer M. Rodd's publication record includes many papers in notable venues. Frequent publication venues consist of:

  • Journal of Cognition
  • Journal of Memory and Language
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Jennifer M. Rodd include:

  • Settling Into Semantic Space: An Ambiguity-Focused Account of Word-Meaning Access, 2020, Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • Moving experimental psychology online: How to obtain high quality data when we can't see our participants, 2023, Journal of Memory and Language
  • The relationship between sentence comprehension and lexical-semantic retuning, 2020, Journal of Memory and Language
  • Recovery from misinterpretations during online sentence processing, 2020, Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition
  • Pupil Dilation Is Sensitive to Semantic Ambiguity and Acoustic Degradation, 2020, Trends in Hearing

The scientist collaborates frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • M. Gareth Gaskell
  • Rachael Catherine Hulme
  • Rebecca A. Gilbert
  • Lena Maria Blott
  • Matthew HC Mak

Their publications contribute to a range of subfields within the broader disciplines, notably:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Computer Science Applications

Best Publications

  • The Neural Mechanisms of Speech Comprehension: fMRI studies of Semantic Ambiguity

    Jennifer M. Rodd;Matthew H. Davis;Ingrid S. Johnsrude

  • Making Sense of Semantic Ambiguity: Semantic Competition in Lexical Access

    Jennifer Rodd;Gareth Gaskell;William Marslen-Wilson

  • Towards the routine use of brain imaging to aid the clinical diagnosis of disorders of consciousness

    M. R. Coleman;M. H. Davis;J. M. Rodd;T. Robson

  • Processing Objects at Different Levels of Specificity

    L. K. Tyler;E. A. Stamatakis;P. Bright;K. Acres

  • Do vegetative patients retain aspects of language comprehension? Evidence from fMRI

    Martin R Coleman;Jennifer M Rodd;Matthew H Davis;Ingrid S Johnsrude

  • Dissociating speech perception and comprehension at reduced levels of awareness

    Matthew H. Davis;Martin R. Coleman;Anthony R. Absalom;Jennifer M. Rodd

  • Modelling the effects of semantic ambiguity in word recognition

    Jennifer M. Rodd;M. Gareth Gaskell;William D. Marslen-Wilson

  • The functional organisation of the fronto-temporal language system: Evidence from syntactic and semantic ambiguity

    Jennifer M. Rodd;Olivia A. Longe;Billi Randall;Lorraine K. Tyler

  • Anteromedial Temporal Cortex Supports Fine-grained Differentiation among Objects

    H.E. Moss;J.M. Rodd;E.A. Stamatakis;P. Bright

  • Localising semantic and syntactic processing in spoken and written language comprehension: an Activation Likelihood Estimation meta-analysis.

    Jennifer M. Rodd;Sylvia Vitello;Anna M. Woollams;Patti Adank;Patti Adank

  • Residual auditory function in persistent vegetative state: a combined pet and fmri study

    Adrian M. Owen;Martin R. Coleman;David K. Menon;Ingrid S. Johnsrude

  • Distinctiveness and correlation in conceptual structure: behavioral and computational studies.

    Billi Randall;Helen E. Moss;Jennifer M. Rodd;Mike Greer

  • Long-term priming of the meanings of ambiguous words

    Jennifer M. Rodd;Belen Lopez Cutrin;Hannah Kirsch;Alessandra Millar

  • The impact of recent and long-term experience on access to word meanings: Evidence from large-scale internet-based experiments

    Jennifer M. Rodd;Zhenguang G. Cai;Hannah N. Betts;Betsy Hanby

  • Why Clowns Taste Funny: The Relationship between Humor and Semantic Ambiguity

    Tristan A. Bekinschtein;Matthew H. Davis;Jennifer M. Rodd;Adrian M. Owen

  • Learning new meanings for old words: effects of semantic relatedness

    Jennifer M. Rodd;Richard Berriman;Matt Landau;Theresa Lee

  • Settling Into Semantic Space: An Ambiguity-Focused Account of Word-Meaning Access:

    Jennifer M Rodd

  • Interleaved silent steady state (ISSS) imaging: a new sparse imaging method applied to auditory fMRI.

    Christian Schwarzbauer;Matthew H. Davis;Jennifer M. Rodd;Ingrid S. Johnsrude;Ingrid S. Johnsrude

  • The role of domain-general frontal systems in language comprehension: Evidence from dual-task interference and semantic ambiguity

    Jennifer M. Rodd;Ingrid S. Johnsrude;Matthew H. Davis

  • Accent modulates access to word meaning: Evidence for a speaker-model account of spoken word recognition.

    Zhenguang Garry Cai;Zhenguang Garry Cai;Rebecca A. Gilbert;Matthew H. Davis;M. Gareth Gaskell

  • Dissociating Frontotemporal Contributions to Semantic Ambiguity Resolution in Spoken Sentences

    Jennifer M. Rodd;Ingrid S. Johnsrude;Matthew H. Davis

  • Do vegetative patients retain aspects of language comprehension? Evidence from fMRI. Commentary

    Nicholas D. Schiff;Martin R. Coleman;Jennifer M. Rodd;Matthew H. Davis

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthew H. Davis
Matthew H. Davis University of Cambridge
Ingrid S. Johnsrude
Ingrid S. Johnsrude University of Western Ontario
Adrian M. Owen
Adrian M. Owen University of Western Ontario
M. Gareth Gaskell
M. Gareth Gaskell University of York
David K. Menon
David K. Menon University of Cambridge
Lorraine K. Tyler
Lorraine K. Tyler University of Cambridge
Helen E. Moss
Helen E. Moss University of Cambridge
William D. Marslen-Wilson
William D. Marslen-Wilson University of Cambridge
John D. Pickard
John D. Pickard University of Cambridge
Anna M. Woollams
Anna M. Woollams University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a degree in psychology can open the door to numerous online programs and diverse career opportunities in the mental health field. Many students choose online psychology degrees for their flexibility, especially those interested in becoming licensed therapists or counselors.

Each state and city has unique requirements for licensure. For example, if you are interested in becoming a licensed therapist in Buffalo, you’ll need to follow specific education and training pathways. Similarly, the process for becoming a licensed therapist in Chandler or becoming a licensed therapist in Charlotte may differ based on local regulations and required credentials.

It’s essential to choose an online program that meets the licensure requirements for your area. For up-to-date information on licensed therapist requirements in Chesapeake or another location, research your state’s guidelines. Paying close attention to these details ensures your online degree prepares you for a rewarding career and state certification.

Best Scientists Citing Jennifer M. Rodd

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles