World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
139
Citations
76278
World Ranking
1750
National Ranking
180

David K. Menon publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David K. Menon sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 890 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

David K. Menon D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David K. Menon sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 139 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

David K. Menon is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom and has an extensive research profile focused on medicine, particularly in the subfields of neurology, epidemiology, emergency medicine, cognitive neuroscience, and radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging.

Their research encompasses several main topics, including:

  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
  • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment

Frequent collaborators in their work include Virginia Newcombe, Peter J. Hutchinson, Emmanuel A. Stamatakis, Giuseppe Citerio, and Ari Ercole.

David K. Menon has contributed to a range of journals with multiple publications in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Journal of Neurotrauma, Neurocritical Care, Intensive Care Medicine, and Brain.

Notable recent papers include:

  • Neurological and neuropsychiatric complications of COVID-19 in 153 patients: a UK-wide surveillance study, 2020, The Lancet Psychiatry
  • Traumatic brain injury: progress and challenges in prevention, clinical care, and research, 2022, The Lancet Neurology
  • Cross-tissue immune cell analysis reveals tissue-specific features in humans, 2022, Science
  • Redefining critical illness, 2022, Nature Medicine
  • The American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Diagnostic Criteria for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, 2023, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Best Publications

  • Efficient Multi-Scale 3D CNN with Fully Connected CRF for Accurate Brain Lesion Segmentation

    Konstantinos Kamnitsas;Christian Ledig;Virginia F.J. Newcombe;Joanna P. Simpson

  • Traumatic brain injury: integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research

    Andrew I R Maas;David K Menon;P David Adelson;Nada Andelic

  • Position Statement: Definition of Traumatic Brain Injury

    David K. Menon;Karen Schwab;David W. Wright;Andrew I. R. Maas

  • Changing patterns in the epidemiology of traumatic brain injury

    Bob Roozenbeek;Andrew I. R. Maas;David K. Menon

  • Neurophysiological Architecture of Functional Magnetic Resonance Images of Human Brain

    Raymond Salvador;John Suckling;Martin R. Coleman;John D. Pickard

  • Neurological and neuropsychiatric complications of COVID-19 in 153 patients: a UK-wide surveillance study.

    Aravinthan Varatharaj;Aravinthan Varatharaj;Naomi Thomas;Mark A Ellul;Mark A Ellul;Mark A Ellul;Nicholas W S Davies

  • Trial of Decompressive Craniectomy for Traumatic Intracranial Hypertension.

    Peter J. Hutchinson;Angelos G. Kolias;Ivan S. Timofeev;Elizabeth A. Corteen

  • Critical Care Management of Patients Following Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Recommendations from the Neurocritical Care Society’s Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference

    Michael N. Diringer;Thomas P. Bleck;J. Claude Hemphill;David Menon

  • Referral to an Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Center and Mortality Among Patients With Severe 2009 Influenza A(H1N1)

    Moronke A. Noah;Giles J. Peek;Simon J. Finney;Mark J. Griffiths

  • Continuous assessment of the cerebral vasomotor reactivity in head injury

    Marek Czosnyka;Piotr Smielewski;Peter Kirkpatrick;Rodney J. Laing

  • Continuous monitoring of cerebrovascular pressure reactivity allows determination of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure in patients with traumatic brain injury.

    Luzius A. Steiner;Marek Czosnyka;Stefan K. Piechnik;Piotr Smielewski

  • Hypothermia for Intracranial Hypertension after Traumatic Brain Injury

    Ronan O'Leary;Peter J A Hutchinson;David Menon

  • The chronic and evolving neurological consequences of traumatic brain injury

    J T Lindsay Wilson;William Stewart;Kristen Dams-O'Connor;Ramon Diaz-Arrastia

  • Symptomatology and Functional Outcome in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Results from the Prospective TRACK-TBI Study

    Paul McMahon;Paul McMahon;Allison Hricik;John K. Yue;Ava M. Puccio

  • Monitoring of cerebral autoregulation in head-injured patients

    M Czosnyka;P Smielewski;P Kirk-patrick;D K Menon

  • Continuous determination of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure in traumatic brain injury.

    Marcel J.H. Aries;Marek Czosnyka;Karol P. Budohoski;Luzius A. Steiner

  • Consensus summary statement of the International Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference on Multimodality Monitoring in Neurocritical Care : a statement for healthcare professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.

    Peter Le Roux;David Krishna Menon;Giuseppe Citerio;Paul Vespa

  • Unsupervised domain adaptation in brain lesion segmentation with adversarial networks

    Konstantinos Kamnitsas;Konstantinos Kamnitsas;Christian F. Baumgartner;Christian Ledig;Virginia F. J. Newcombe

  • Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI): A Prospective Longitudinal Observational Study

    Andrew I.R. Maas;David K. Menon;Ewout W. Steyerberg;Giuseppe Citerio

  • Specialist neurocritical care and outcome from head injury

    Hiren C. Patel;David K. Menon;Susan Tebbs;Rebecca Hawker

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter J. Hutchinson
Peter J. Hutchinson University of Cambridge
John D. Pickard
John D. Pickard University of Cambridge
Marek Czosnyka
Marek Czosnyka University of Cambridge
Peter Smielewski
Peter Smielewski University of Cambridge
Nino Stocchetti
Nino Stocchetti University of Milan
Andrew I. R. Maas
Andrew I. R. Maas University of Antwerp
Ewout W. Steyerberg
Ewout W. Steyerberg Leiden University Medical Center
Tim D. Fryer
Tim D. Fryer University of Cambridge
Emmanuel Stamatakis
Emmanuel Stamatakis University of Sydney
Peter J. Kirkpatrick
Peter J. Kirkpatrick University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re exploring alternatives or complementary options to studying Medicine in the USA, there are several promising online degrees and career pathways in the healthcare field. Many students consider nursing as a rewarding and flexible entry point into healthcare. For those who already hold a non-nursing bachelor’s degree, online direct entry msn programs for non-nursing majors enable a swift transition into advanced nursing roles, often without years of prerequisite study.

Prospective nurses seeking less competitive admissions can look into direct entry nursing programs and nursing schools that don't require teas, both of which make entry more accessible by minimizing tough entrance exams or specific requirements.

Not all healthcare roles require patient care. If you’re interested in administrative work, the best medical billing and coding schools online offer quality programs that can lead to stable, in-demand careers—even offering financial aid to eligible students.

Exploring these online programs can open new doors in healthcare, making diverse, well-paid career options more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing David K. Menon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles