World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 139 1750 1625 180 172 890 76278

David K. Menon publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David K. Menon between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David K. Menon published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 28.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 83 publications in 2020. 78 of the 1,069 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 83. Peak 83 publications in 2020. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 7 publications 1991: 8 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 12 publications 1997: 17 publications 1998: 20 publications 1999: 12 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 15 publications 2003: 23 publications 2004: 37 publications 2005: 43 publications 2006: 29 publications 2007: 21 publications 2008: 26 publications 2009: 21 publications 2010: 22 publications 2011: 40 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 32 publications 2014: 36 publications 2015: 35 publications 2016: 40 publications 2017: 56 publications 2018: 46 publications 2019: 52 publications 2020: 83 publications 2021: 83 publications 2022: 58 publications 2023: 53 publications 2024: 59 publications 2025: 19 publications
1988 2025

1,069 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David K. Menon: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 1
1990 7
1991 8
1992 6
1993 8
1994 4
1995 8
1996 12
1997 17
1998 20
1999 12
2000 8
2001 8
2002 15
2003 23
2004 37
2005 43
2006 29
2007 21
2008 26
2009 21
2010 22
2011 40
2012 20
2013 32
2014 36
2015 35
2016 40
2017 56
2018 46
2019 52
2020 83
2021 83
2022 58
2023 53
2024 59
2025 19
Total 1,069
Download as CSV

David K. Menon publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David K. Menon sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 881–900 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 890 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139 890
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

David K. Menon D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David K. Menon sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 138–139 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 139 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134 139
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

David K. Menon is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom and has an extensive research profile focused on medicine, particularly in the subfields of neurology, epidemiology, emergency medicine, cognitive neuroscience, and radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging.

Their research encompasses several main topics, including:

  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
  • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment

Frequent collaborators in their work include Virginia Newcombe, Peter J. Hutchinson, Emmanuel A. Stamatakis, Giuseppe Citerio, and Ari Ercole.

David K. Menon has contributed to a range of journals with multiple publications in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Journal of Neurotrauma, Neurocritical Care, Intensive Care Medicine, and Brain.

Notable recent papers include:

  • Neurological and neuropsychiatric complications of COVID-19 in 153 patients: a UK-wide surveillance study, 2020, The Lancet Psychiatry
  • Traumatic brain injury: progress and challenges in prevention, clinical care, and research, 2022, The Lancet Neurology
  • Cross-tissue immune cell analysis reveals tissue-specific features in humans, 2022, Science
  • Redefining critical illness, 2022, Nature Medicine
  • The American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Diagnostic Criteria for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, 2023, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Best Publications

  • Efficient Multi-Scale 3D CNN with Fully Connected CRF for Accurate Brain Lesion Segmentation

    Konstantinos Kamnitsas;Christian Ledig;Virginia F.J. Newcombe;Joanna P. Simpson

  • Traumatic brain injury: integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research

    Andrew I R Maas;David K Menon;P David Adelson;Nada Andelic

  • Position Statement: Definition of Traumatic Brain Injury

    David K. Menon;Karen Schwab;David W. Wright;Andrew I. R. Maas

  • Changing patterns in the epidemiology of traumatic brain injury

    Bob Roozenbeek;Andrew I. R. Maas;David K. Menon

  • Neurophysiological Architecture of Functional Magnetic Resonance Images of Human Brain

    Raymond Salvador;John Suckling;Martin R. Coleman;John D. Pickard

  • Neurological and neuropsychiatric complications of COVID-19 in 153 patients: a UK-wide surveillance study.

    Aravinthan Varatharaj;Aravinthan Varatharaj;Naomi Thomas;Mark A Ellul;Mark A Ellul;Mark A Ellul;Nicholas W S Davies

  • Trial of Decompressive Craniectomy for Traumatic Intracranial Hypertension.

    Peter J. Hutchinson;Angelos G. Kolias;Ivan S. Timofeev;Elizabeth A. Corteen

  • Critical Care Management of Patients Following Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Recommendations from the Neurocritical Care Society’s Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference

    Michael N. Diringer;Thomas P. Bleck;J. Claude Hemphill;David Menon

  • Referral to an Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Center and Mortality Among Patients With Severe 2009 Influenza A(H1N1)

    Moronke A. Noah;Giles J. Peek;Simon J. Finney;Mark J. Griffiths

  • Continuous assessment of the cerebral vasomotor reactivity in head injury

    Marek Czosnyka;Piotr Smielewski;Peter Kirkpatrick;Rodney J. Laing

  • Continuous monitoring of cerebrovascular pressure reactivity allows determination of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure in patients with traumatic brain injury.

    Luzius A. Steiner;Marek Czosnyka;Stefan K. Piechnik;Piotr Smielewski

  • Hypothermia for Intracranial Hypertension after Traumatic Brain Injury

    Ronan O'Leary;Peter J A Hutchinson;David Menon

  • The chronic and evolving neurological consequences of traumatic brain injury

    J T Lindsay Wilson;William Stewart;Kristen Dams-O'Connor;Ramon Diaz-Arrastia

  • Symptomatology and Functional Outcome in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Results from the Prospective TRACK-TBI Study

    Paul McMahon;Paul McMahon;Allison Hricik;John K. Yue;Ava M. Puccio

  • Monitoring of cerebral autoregulation in head-injured patients

    M Czosnyka;P Smielewski;P Kirk-patrick;D K Menon

  • Continuous determination of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure in traumatic brain injury.

    Marcel J.H. Aries;Marek Czosnyka;Karol P. Budohoski;Luzius A. Steiner

  • Consensus summary statement of the International Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference on Multimodality Monitoring in Neurocritical Care : a statement for healthcare professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.

    Peter Le Roux;David Krishna Menon;Giuseppe Citerio;Paul Vespa

  • Unsupervised domain adaptation in brain lesion segmentation with adversarial networks

    Konstantinos Kamnitsas;Konstantinos Kamnitsas;Christian F. Baumgartner;Christian Ledig;Virginia F. J. Newcombe

  • Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI): A Prospective Longitudinal Observational Study

    Andrew I.R. Maas;David K. Menon;Ewout W. Steyerberg;Giuseppe Citerio

  • Specialist neurocritical care and outcome from head injury

    Hiren C. Patel;David K. Menon;Susan Tebbs;Rebecca Hawker

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter J. Hutchinson
Peter J. Hutchinson University of Cambridge
John D. Pickard
John D. Pickard University of Cambridge
Marek Czosnyka
Marek Czosnyka University of Cambridge
Peter Smielewski
Peter Smielewski University of Cambridge
Nino Stocchetti
Nino Stocchetti University of Milan
Andrew I. R. Maas
Andrew I. R. Maas University of Antwerp
Ewout W. Steyerberg
Ewout W. Steyerberg Leiden University Medical Center
Tim D. Fryer
Tim D. Fryer University of Cambridge
Emmanuel Stamatakis
Emmanuel Stamatakis University of Sydney
Peter J. Kirkpatrick
Peter J. Kirkpatrick University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re exploring alternatives or complementary options to studying Medicine in the USA, there are several promising online degrees and career pathways in the healthcare field. Many students consider nursing as a rewarding and flexible entry point into healthcare. For those who already hold a non-nursing bachelor’s degree, online direct entry msn programs for non-nursing majors enable a swift transition into advanced nursing roles, often without years of prerequisite study.

Prospective nurses seeking less competitive admissions can look into direct entry nursing programs and nursing schools that don't require teas, both of which make entry more accessible by minimizing tough entrance exams or specific requirements.

Not all healthcare roles require patient care. If you’re interested in administrative work, the best medical billing and coding schools online offer quality programs that can lead to stable, in-demand careers—even offering financial aid to eligible students.

Exploring these online programs can open new doors in healthcare, making diverse, well-paid career options more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing David K. Menon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles