World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Emmanuel Stamatakis

Emmanuel Stamatakis

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
112
Citations
55050
World Ranking
5095
National Ranking
141

Emmanuel Stamatakis publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emmanuel Stamatakis sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 575 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Emmanuel Stamatakis D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emmanuel Stamatakis sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 112 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Emmanuel Stamatakis is affiliated with the University of Sydney in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience and medicine, with significant contributions to cognitive neuroscience and related subfields.

The scientist has published extensively in several key areas of study. These include:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Psychedelics and Drug Studies
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

Their work spans various subfields, among which cognitive neuroscience, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, neurology, epidemiology, and experimental and cognitive psychology are notable.

Publication venues for Stamatakis include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • NeuroImage
  • Neurocritical Care
  • Nature Communications
  • Communications Biology

Frequent collaborators in their research have been David Menon, Andrea I. Luppi, Guy Williams, Lorina Naçi, and Judith Allanson.

Selected recent publications are:

  • "A synergistic core for human brain evolution and cognition," 2022, Nature Neuroscience
  • "LSD alters dynamic integration and segregation in the human brain," 2020, NeuroImage
  • "Receptor-informed network control theory links LSD and psilocybin to a flattening of the brain's control energy landscape," 2022, Nature Communications
  • "Information decomposition and the informational architecture of the brain," 2024, Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • "Combining network topology and information theory to construct representative brain networks," 2020, Network Neuroscience

Best Publications

  • World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour

    Fiona C. Bull;Salih S. Al-Ansari;Stuart Biddle;Katja Borodulin

  • Traumatic brain injury: integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research

    Andrew I R Maas;David K Menon;P David Adelson;Nada Andelic

  • Daily sitting time and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis.

    Josephine Y. Chau;Anne C. Grunseit;Tien Chey;Emmanuel Stamatakis;Emmanuel Stamatakis

  • The ABC of physical activity for health: A consensus statement from the British Association of Sport and Exercise Sciences

    Gary O'Donovan;Anthony J Blazevich;Colin Boreham;Ashley R Cooper

  • Association between psychological distress and mortality: individual participant pooled analysis of 10 prospective cohort studies

    Tom C Russ;Emmanuel Stamatakis;Mark Hamer;John M Starr

  • Metabolically Healthy Obesity and Risk of All-Cause and Cardiovascular Disease Mortality

    Mark Hamer;Emmanuel Stamatakis

  • Sitting time, physical activity, and risk of mortality in adults

    Emmanuel Stamatakis;Joanne Gale;Adrian Bauman;Ulf Ekelund

  • Childhood obesity and overweight prevalence trends in England: evidence for growing socioeconomic disparities.

    Emmanuel Stamatakis;Jane Wardle;Tim J Cole

  • Screen-based entertainment time, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular events: population-based study with ongoing mortality and hospital events follow-up.

    Emmanuel Stamatakis;Mark Hamer;David W. Dunstan;David W. Dunstan;David W. Dunstan

  • Body mass index, waist circumference, and waist-hip ratio: which is the better discriminator of cardiovascular disease mortality risk? Evidence from an individual-participant meta-analysis of 82,864 participants from nine cohort studies

    S. Czernichow;A.-P. Kengne;E. Stamatakis;M. Hamer

  • How does light-intensity physical activity associate with adult cardiometabolic health and mortality? Systematic review with meta-analysis of experimental and observational studies

    Sebastien F M Chastin;Marieke De Craemer;Katrien De Cocker;Lauren Powell

  • Case-mix, care pathways, and outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury in CENTER-TBI: a European prospective, multicentre, longitudinal, cohort study

    Ewout W. Steyerberg;Ewout W. Steyerberg;Eveline Wiegers;Charlie Sewalt;Andras Buki

  • Association of “Weekend Warrior” and other leisure time physical activity patterns with risks for all-cause, cardiovascular disease, and cancer mortality

    Gary O’Donovan;I-Min Lee;Mark Hamer;Emmanuel Stamatakis

  • Modulation of motor and premotor cortices by actions, action words and action sentences.

    Ana Raposo;Helen E. Moss;Emmanuel A. Stamatakis;Lorraine K. Tyler

  • Overweight and obesity in infants and pre-school children in the European Union: a review of existing data

    A Cattaneo;L Monasta;E Stamatakis;S Lioret

  • Effect of moderate to vigorous physical activity on all-cause mortality in middle-aged and older Australians

    Klaus Gebel;Klaus Gebel;Ding Ding;Tien Chey;Emmanuel Stamatakis

  • Psychological Distress as a Risk Factor for Cardiovascular Events: Pathophysiological and Behavioral Mechanisms

    Mark Hamer;Gerard J. Molloy;Emmanuel Stamatakis

  • Overweight and obesity trends from 1974 to 2003 in English children: what is the role of socioeconomic factors?

    Emmanuel Stamatakis;Paola Primatesta;Sue Chinn;Roberto J Rona

  • Psychological distress in relation to site specific cancer mortality: pooling of unpublished data from 16 prospective cohort studies.

    G. David Batty;Thomas Russ;Emmanuel Stamatakis;Mika Kivimaki

  • Neuroimaging in eating disorders.

    Emmanuel A Stamatakis;Marion M Hetherington

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark Hamer
Mark Hamer University College London
Adrian Bauman
Adrian Bauman University of Sydney
David K. Menon
David K. Menon University of Cambridge
Lorraine K. Tyler
Lorraine K. Tyler University of Cambridge
G. David Batty
G. David Batty University College London
Mika Kivimäki
Mika Kivimäki University College London
William D. Marslen-Wilson
William D. Marslen-Wilson University of Cambridge
Barbara J. Sahakian
Barbara J. Sahakian University of Cambridge
Ulf Ekelund
Ulf Ekelund Norwegian School of Sport Sciences
Stuart J. H. Biddle
Stuart J. H. Biddle University of Southern Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine opens doors to a wide range of online degrees and related pathways. Many healthcare roles now allow you to study and qualify from the convenience of your home, making it easier for students to balance learning with other commitments. For those interested in nursing, some nursing schools that don't require teas or hesi exams provide a way to enter the field with reduced testing barriers.

Alternatively, if you are drawn to healthcare management, pursuing an online healthcare administration degree can prepare you for leadership roles in hospitals and clinics. For registered nurses seeking career advancement, rn to fnp programs help you bridge the gap towards becoming a family nurse practitioner. Additionally, nutrition is an in-demand and growing field. The best online nutrition programs offer flexible options to specialize in health promotion and dietary consulting.

Each of these pathways offers unique benefits and can be tailored to your specific career interests in healthcare. Consider which direction aligns best with your goals as you plan your medical education journey.

Best Scientists Citing Emmanuel Stamatakis

Trending Scientists