World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Best Female Scientists
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Best Female Scientists 124 451 428 43 41 1081 75500
Medicine 131 2351 2188 246 237 1062 87717

Melanie J. Davies publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Melanie J. Davies between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Melanie J. Davies published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 37.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 114 publications in 2021. 142 of the 1,366 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 114. Peak 114 publications in 2021. 1990: 2 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 2 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 20 publications 2008: 37 publications 2009: 19 publications 2010: 34 publications 2011: 48 publications 2012: 64 publications 2013: 57 publications 2014: 46 publications 2015: 62 publications 2016: 66 publications 2017: 99 publications 2018: 69 publications 2019: 86 publications 2020: 106 publications 2021: 114 publications 2022: 105 publications 2023: 107 publications 2024: 74 publications 2025: 68 publications
1990 2025

1,366 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Melanie J. Davies: publications per year, 1990 to 2025
Year Publications
1990 2
1991 1
1992 2
1993 6
1994 6
1995 2
1996 7
1997 4
1998 3
1999 7
2000 2
2001 3
2002 4
2003 4
2004 11
2005 13
2006 8
2007 20
2008 37
2009 19
2010 34
2011 48
2012 64
2013 57
2014 46
2015 62
2016 66
2017 99
2018 69
2019 86
2020 106
2021 114
2022 105
2023 107
2024 74
2025 68
Total 1,366
Download as CSV

Melanie J. Davies publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Melanie J. Davies sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 1,061–1,080 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,062 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77 1,062
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Melanie J. Davies D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Melanie J. Davies sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 130–131 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 131 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179 131
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Female Scientists Award

Overview

Melanie J. Davies is affiliated with the University of Leicester in the United Kingdom and has an extensive publication record primarily within the field of Medicine. Their research is strongly focused on endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism, with significant contributions spanning related subfields such as physiology, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, molecular biology, and epidemiology.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics mainly centered on diabetes treatment and management, metabolism, diabetes in relation to cancer, diabetes management and research, diabetes management and education, chronic disease management strategies, physical activity and health, and cardiovascular function and risk factors.

Several recent publications illustrate the core areas of their research interests and contributions. Notable papers include:

  • Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes, 2022. A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD), 2022, Diabetes Care
  • Semaglutide 2·4 mg once a week in adults with overweight or obesity, and type 2 diabetes (STEP 2): a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, 2021, The Lancet
  • Once-Weekly Semaglutide in Adults with Overweight or Obesity, 2021, New England Journal of Medicine

Other frequently published venues include Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism, Diabetes Care, Diabetic Medicine, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), and Diabetes. This distribution reflects the scientist's consistent focus on diabetes and metabolic research within leading clinical and biomedical journals.

Frequent co-authors in their research collaborations include Kamlesh Khunti, Thomas Yates, Francesco Zaccardi, Joseph Henson, and Clare Gillies. These collaborations likely contribute to a multidisciplinary approach across clinical and epidemiological studies in metabolic health and diabetes.

Their publication record encompasses a broad scope of diabetes-related clinical trials, management protocols, and metabolic disease research. The emphasis on chronic disease management and cardiovascular risk factors indicates an integrated approach to the complications associated with metabolic disorders.

Best Publications

  • Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes, 2018. A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD)

    Melanie J. Davies;David A. D’Alessio;Judith Fradkin;Walter N. Kernan

  • Sedentary time in adults and the association with diabetes, cardiovascular disease and death: systematic review and meta-analysis

    Emma G Wilmot;Charlotte L Edwardson;Charlotte L Edwardson;Felix A Achana;Melanie J Davies;Melanie J Davies;Melanie J Davies

  • Once-Weekly Semaglutide in Adults with Overweight or Obesity.

    John P.H. Wilding;Rachel L. Batterham;Rachel L. Batterham;Salvatore Calanna;Melanie Davies

  • The prevalence of co‐morbid depression in adults with Type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

    S. Ali;M. A. Stone;J. L. Peters;M. J. Davies

  • Tirzepatide versus Semaglutide Once Weekly in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.

    Juan P. Frías;Melanie J. Davies;Julio Rosenstock;Federico C. Pérez Manghi

  • Effectiveness of the diabetes education and self management for ongoing and newly diagnosed (DESMOND) programme for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: cluster randomised controlled trial

    Melanie J. Davies;S. Heller;T.C. Skinner;M.J. Campbell

  • Fruit and vegetable intake and incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analysis

    Patrice Carter;Laura J Gray;Jacqui Troughton;Kamlesh Khunti

  • Efficacy of Liraglutide for Weight Loss Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes The SCALE Diabetes Randomized Clinical Trial

    Melanie J. Davies;Richard Bergenstal;Bruce Bode;Robert F. Kushner

  • Addition of biphasic, prandial, or basal insulin to oral therapy in type 2 diabetes

    Rury R. Holman;Kerensa I. Thorne;Andrew J. Farmer;Melanie J. Davies

  • A 26-Week, Randomized, Parallel, Treat-to-Target Trial Comparing Insulin Detemir With NPH Insulin as Add-On Therapy to Oral Glucose-Lowering Drugs in Insulin-Naïve People With Type 2 Diabetes

    Kjeld Hermansen;Melanie Davies;Taudeusz Derezinski;Gabrielle Martinez Ravn

  • Effect of valsartan on the incidence of diabetes and cardiovascular events.

    John McMurray;R Holman;Steven Haffner;M Bethel

  • Three-Year Efficacy of Complex Insulin Regimens in Type 2 Diabetes

    Rury R. Holman;Andrew J. Farmer;Melanie J. Davies;Jonathan C. Levy

  • Progression to type 2 diabetes in women with a known history of gestational diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis

    Elpida Vounzoulaki;Kamlesh Khunti;Kamlesh Khunti;Sophia C Abner;Sophia C Abner;Bee K Tan

  • Liraglutide versus sitagliptin for patients with type 2 diabetes who did not have adequate glycaemic control with metformin: a 26-week, randomised, parallel-group, open-label trial

    Richard E Pratley;Michael Nauck;Timothy Bailey;Eduard Montanya

  • Association of Sedentary Behaviour with Metabolic Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis

    Charlotte L. Edwardson;Charlotte L. Edwardson;Trish Gorely;Melanie J. Davies;Laura J. Gray

  • Clinical Inertia in People With Type 2 Diabetes: A retrospective cohort study of more than 80,000 people

    Kamlesh Khunti;Michael L. Wolden;Brian Larsen Thorsted;Marc Andersen

  • Semaglutide 2·4 mg once a week in adults with overweight or obesity, and type 2 diabetes (STEP 2): a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

    Melanie Davies;Louise Færch;Ole K Jeppesen;Arash Pakseresht

  • Pathophysiology of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a 90-year perspective

    Francesco Zaccardi;David R Webb;Thomas Yates;Melanie J Davies

  • Effect of Continued Weekly Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo on Weight Loss Maintenance in Adults With Overweight or Obesity: The STEP 4 Randomized Clinical Trial

    Domenica Rubino;Niclas Abrahamsson;Melanie Davies;Melanie Davies;Dan Hesse

Frequent Co-Authors

Kamlesh Khunti
Kamlesh Khunti University of Leicester
Stuart J. H. Biddle
Stuart J. H. Biddle University of Southern Queensland
Trish Gorely
Trish Gorely University of the Highlands and Islands
Alastair Gray
Alastair Gray University of Oxford
Simon J. Griffin
Simon J. Griffin University of Cambridge
Simon Heller
Simon Heller University of Sheffield
Rury R. Holman
Rury R. Holman University of Oxford
David W. Dunstan
David W. Dunstan Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute
Nicholas J. Wareham
Nicholas J. Wareham University of Cambridge
Naveed Sattar
Naveed Sattar University of Glasgow

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in the medical field but seeking alternative pathways, there are many online degrees and career options worth considering. One flexible option is to apply for a nursing school no entrance exam requirement, which allows prospective nurses to bypass certain standardized admissions tests, making entry into the field more accessible.

If you’re drawn to leadership roles within healthcare, online health administration programs offer the academic training needed for administrative positions in medical settings, often allowing a fast-track completion.

Practicing nurses with an associate degree can advance their careers through adn to np bridge programs, which help bridge the gap to a master’s degree and prepare graduates for nurse practitioner roles.

For those interested in nutrition and wellness, earning the best online food science degree can lead to careers in dietetics, public health, or food industry innovation.

These alternative and online pathways can help you tailor your education to your interests, timeframe, and career goals within the diverse landscape of medicine and healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Melanie J. Davies

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles