World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Peter J. Haeussler publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter J. Haeussler sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Peter J. Haeussler D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter J. Haeussler sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter J. Haeussler is a researcher affiliated with the United States Geological Survey in the United States. Their work predominantly centers on Earth and Planetary Sciences, with an emphasis on geophysics and atmospheric science. Their research outputs span various subfields including Earth-Surface Processes, Geology, and Artificial Intelligence as applied to Earth sciences.

The main topics covered in their work include earthquake and tectonic studies, geological and geochemical analysis, geology and paleoclimatology research, geological formations and processes, high-pressure geophysics and materials, seismic waves and analysis, and geological studies and exploration.

Frequent coauthors in their publications are:

  • Robert C. Witter
  • Adrian M. Bender
  • Richard O. Lease
  • Peter M. Powers
  • Daniel S. Brothers

Peter J. Haeussler's research has been published in several venues, with multiple works appearing in:

  • Geosphere
  • Geophysical Monograph
  • Abstracts with Programs - Geological Society of America
  • Earthquake Spectra
  • Sedimentology

Selected recent papers authored or coauthored by Peter J. Haeussler include:

  • The 2023 US 50-State National Seismic Hazard Model: Overview and implications, 2023, Earthquake Spectra
  • Detection and Assessment of a Large and Potentially Tsunamigenic Periglacial Landslide in Barry Arm, Alaska, 2020, Geophysical Research Letters
  • The Alaska Amphibious Community Seismic Experiment, 2020, Seismological Research Letters
  • Rapid shallow megathrust afterslip from the 2021 M8.2 Chignik, Alaska earthquake revealed by seafloor geodesy, 2023, Science Advances
  • Turbidite stratigraphy in proglacial lakes: Deciphering trigger mechanisms using a statistical approach, 2020, Sedimentology

Best Publications

  • The 2002 Denali fault earthquake, Alaska: a large magnitude, slip-partitioned event.

    Donna Eberhart-Phillips;Peter J Haeussler;Jeffrey T Freymueller;Arthur D Frankel

  • Imaging the transition from Aleutian subduction to Yakutat collision in central Alaska, with local earthquakes and active source data

    Donna Eberhart-Phillips;Donna Eberhart-Phillips;Douglas H. Christensen;Thomas M. Brocher;Roger Hansen

  • Surface Rupture and Slip Distribution of the Denali and Totschunda Faults in the 3 November 2002 M 7.9 Earthquake, Alaska

    Peter J. Haeussler;David P. Schwartz;Timothy E. Dawson;Heidi D. Stenner

  • Life and death of the Resurrection plate: Evidence for its existence and subduction in the northeastern Pacific in Paleocene–Eocene time

    Peter J. Haeussler;Dwight C. Bradley;Ray E. Wells;Marti L. Miller

  • Geologic signature of early Tertiary ridge subduction in Alaska

    Dwight C. Bradley;Timothy M. Kusky;Peter J. Haeussler;Richard J. Goldfarb

  • Geologic history of Siletzia, a large igneous province in the Oregon and Washington Coast Range: Correlation to the geomagnetic polarity time scale and implications for a long-lived Yellowstone hotspot

    Ray Wells;David Bukry;Richard Friedman;Douglas Pyle

  • Link between ridge subduction and gold mineralization in southern Alaska

    Peter J. Haeussler;Dwight C. Bradley;Richard Goldfarb;Lawrence W. Snee

  • Controls on accretion of flysch and mélange belts at convergent margins: Evidence from the Chugach Bay thrust and Iceworm mélange, Chugach accretionary wedge, Alaska

    Timothy M. Kusky;Dwight C. Bradley;Peter J. Haeussler;Susan M. Karl

  • The 2015 landslide and tsunami in Taan Fiord, Alaska

    Bretwood Higman;Dan H. Shugar;Colin P. Stark;Göran Ekström

  • Geologic map of central (interior) Alaska

    Frederic H. Wilson;James H. Dover;Dwight C. Bradley;Florence R. Weber

  • Denali fault slip rates and Holocene-late Pleistocene kinematics of central Alaska

    A. Matmon;D. P. Schwartz;Peter J. Haeussler;R. Finkel

  • An Overview of the Neotectonics of Interior Alaska: Far‐Field Deformation from the Yakutat Microplate Collision

    Peter J. Haeussler

  • Spatial variations in focused exhumation along a continental-scale strike-slip fault: The Denali fault of the eastern Alaska Range

    Jeff A. Benowitz;Paul W. Layer;Phil Armstrong;Stephanie E. Perry

  • Potential seismic hazards and tectonics of the upper Cook Inlet basin, Alaska, based on analysis of Pliocene and younger deformation

    Peter J. Haeussler;Ronald L. Bruhn;Thomas L. Pratt

  • Active Tectonics and Seismic Potential of Alaska

    Jeffrey T. Freymueller;Peter J. Haeussler;Robert L. Wesson;Göran Ekström

  • The 2023 US 50-State National Seismic Hazard Model: Overview and implications

    Unknown

  • Progressive deformation of the Chugach accretionary complex, Alaska, during a paleogene ridge-trench encounter

    Timothy M. Kusky;Dwight C. Bradley;Peter Haeussler

  • Paleoseismic potential of sublacustrine landslide records in a high-seismicity setting (south-central Alaska)

    Nore Praet;Jasper Moernaut;Jasper Moernaut;Maarten Van Daele;Evelien Boes

  • Controls on intrusion of near-trench magmas of the Sanak-Baranof belt, Alaska, during Paleogene ridge subduction, and consequences for forearc evolution

    Timothy M. Kusky;Dwight C. Bradley;D. Thomas Donely;David Rowley

  • Uplift and subsidence reveal a nonpersistent megathrust rupture boundary (Sitkinak Island, Alaska)

    Richard W. Briggs;Simon E. Engelhart;Alan R. Nelson;Tina Dura

  • Why the 2002 Denali fault rupture propagated onto the Totschunda fault: Implications for fault branching and seismic hazards

    David P. Schwartz;Peter J. Haeussler;Gordon G. Seitz;Timothy E. Dawson

Frequent Co-Authors

Dwight C. Bradley
Dwight C. Bradley United States Geological Survey
Paul W. Layer
Paul W. Layer University of Alaska Fairbanks
Robert C. Witter
Robert C. Witter United States Geological Survey
Marc De Batist
Marc De Batist Ghent University
Timothy M. Kusky
Timothy M. Kusky China University of Geosciences
Sean P.S. Gulick
Sean P.S. Gulick The University of Texas at Austin
Ray E. Wells
Ray E. Wells United States Geological Survey
Paul B. O'Sullivan
Paul B. O'Sullivan Syracuse University
Jeffrey T. Freymueller
Jeffrey T. Freymueller Michigan State University
Marten Geertsema
Marten Geertsema University of Northern British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Earth Science, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many students seek affordable and flexible programs, similar to the spanish degree online offerings, which highlight accessible education pathways with promising financial outcomes.

Veterans, in particular, benefit from tailored programs that recognize their unique backgrounds. Programs like the spanish degree online for veterans provide valuable support and resources, a model increasingly adopted by Earth Science programs aiming to bring more diverse perspectives into the field.

In addition, creative and analytical skills gained through an online mfa can complement scientific expertise, especially in roles requiring effective communication and visualization of complex data.

Finally, leadership and organizational abilities developed in an online masters in human resource management program can be advantageous for Earth Science professionals managing teams or projects. Combining scientific knowledge with such skills enhances career versatility and advancement potential.

Best Scientists Citing Peter J. Haeussler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles